ML19319B997

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Insp Rept 50-346/72-02 on 70410-12.No Noncompliance Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Class I Concrete & Other Structures,& QA Audit Repts
ML19319B997
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse Cleveland Electric icon.png
Issue date: 05/16/1972
From: Hayes D, Rohrbacher R, Vetter W
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML19319B996 List:
References
50-346-72-02, 50-346-72-2, NUDOCS 8001290724
Download: ML19319B997 (9)


See also: IR 05000346/1972002

Text

. _ _ .

-

-_

_

.

~

O

^

U. S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION

DIRECTORATE OF REGULATORY OPERATIONS

REGION III

RO Inspection Report No. 050-346/72-02

I

Subject: Toledo Edison Company

License No. CPPR-80

Davis-Besse

Priority: N/A

Oak Harbor, Ohio

Category: A

Type of Licensee:

PWR (B&W) - 872 Mwe

Type of Inspection:

Routine, Unannounced

Dates of Inspection:

April 10 - 12, 1972

Dates of Previous Inspection: January 11 - 12, 1972

kN h4

"

Principal Inspector:

D. W. Hayes

8 -/ 8' 7Z

(Date)

.,

Accompanying Inspector:

R. A. Rohrbacher

S -/S - 7 L.-

'

(Date)

Other Acccmpanying Personnel. None

Reviewed By:

W. E. Vetter, Senior Reactor Inspector

J

!S '

(Date)

Proprietary Information: None

,

eo01290 734

-

-

_

._

_

.

-- --

.

.

04

SECTION I

.

t

Enforcement Action

,

A.'

Noncompliance: None

B.

Nonconformance: None

C.

Safety Items: None

Licensee Action on Previously Identified Enforcement Matters

<

No previously outstanding enforcement matters exist.

Unresolved Items

A.

Cas Waste Decay Tanks

Material certification records for the flange bolts on the waste gas

decaj tanks were not available for review.

(Paragraph 7)

B.

Material Storage

Several metal components for Class I structures were observed to be

O

<

in contact with the ground.

(Paragraph 6)

C.

Steam Generator Supports

Records were not available to verify the required qualifications of

NDT technicians performing shop ultrasonic examination on 24 of the

steam generator support structure components.

(Paragraph 8)

j

Status of Previously Reported Unresolved Items

l

A.

Possible Low Compressive Strength Concrete (Report No. 346/72-01)

Low seven-day compressive strength test results on test cylinders,

representing concrete placed December 28 and 29, 1971, and

January 6 and 7, 1972, indicated that the 28-day strength requirement

may not be met.

Consequently, a concrete production stop order was

issued on January 12, 1972, to be in effect until the cause of the

problem could be identified.

Subsequent investigations indicated

that the cause of the low seven-day test results was the cement.

The tricalcium silicate (C S) concent of the cement, although within

3

-2-

.

--

.

/

\\_,/

specifications, was lover than normal, ano the cement exhibited Type V

characteristics,

i.e.,

low early strenth and high-late strength, rather

than the early strength development expected for Type II cement specified.

Although the 28-day compressive stength test results for 4 of 15 test

cylinders representing an 810-cubic yard pour (No. 557) did not meet

the specified design strength of 5,000 psig, the 90-day test results

established that all the concrete in question developed strengths above

the design requirements.

Bechtel Corporation engineering personnel,

i

in consultation with Toledo Edison Company and the Medusa Cement Company,

reviewed these and other results of the investigation and accepted the

structure "as is".

The concrete productisn stop order was rescinded on January 24, 1972,

following replacement of all cement stocks onsite and at the Medusa

Bay bridge storage yard, initiatJ.on of revised sampling and testing

procedures, and verification through a series of tests that acceptable

concrete could be produced at the site.

As of April 12, 1972, the final, approved copies of the revised sampling

and testing procedures had not been received from the Bechtel design

engineer. Consequently, this aspect of the marter remains open pending

a review of the approved procedures.

(Paragraph 5)

B.

Valve Design Verification (Report Nos. 346/71-02 and 346/72-01)

,fsh

I

\\s_ /

Only one purchase order for Class I cast valves has been issued to date

by Babcock & Wilcox (to Crosby Valve for two pressurizer cafety valves).

J. D. Lenardson, TECO/QAE, told the inspector that wall thickness

measurements of these valves will be checked against specifications

prior to use.

Moreover, Mr. Lenardson stated that, if any additional

Class I cast valves are ordered for the Davis-Besse facility, they

would be subject to measurement checks.

This item is considered to

be resolved.

Design Changes

No design changes were reported or observed.

Unusual Occurrences: None

P ersons Contacted

The following people, as well as other personnel listed under the Management

Interview Section of this report, were contacted during the inspection:

-3-

d

,

- _ _

--

.

g _ /

Toledo Edison Company (TECO)

J. A. Lenardson, QA Engineer (Site)

W. G. Moring, Jr., QA Engineer (Mechanical)

E. M. Wilcox, QA Engineer (Welding NDT)

Bechtel Corporation (Bechtel)

A.

S. Martin, QA Engineer

M. R. Stephens, Project Construction Manager

R. L. Lykens, QC Engineer

H. A. Ablondi, QA Engineer

Grinnell Corporation (Grinnell)

D. R. Giguere, QA Manager (Site)

Management Interview

Personnel in Attendance

Toledo Edison Company (TECO)

G. J. Sampson, Vice President - Power

J. E. Seward, Engineering Division

O

W. H. Schultz, Engineering Division

J. A. Lenardson, QA Engineer (Site)

B. R. Beyer, Operations Maintenance Manager

W. G. Moring, Jr., QA Engineer (Mechanical)

E. M. Wilcox, QA Engineer (Welding NDT)

Be:htel Corporation (Bechtel)

D. L. Reddick, Field Project Engineer

R. L. Lykens, QC Engineer

'

A. S. Martin, QA Engineer

G. A. Sullivan, Field Coordination

Items Discussed

>

A.

Possible Low Compressive Stengch Concrete

The inspector stated that he had reviewed the Bechtel investigation

packet concerned with low compressive strength concrete and agreed with

,

!

the final disposition of the nonconforming concrete. The inspector

I

_4_

,

)

s

- , - .

- - , . - - , - , , - , - - - - , - - - , , , -

a a

--

.

.

.-

.

(

added that the final resolution of the " cement problem" would follow

'-'

review of recently completed procedure changes which were now in effect

but not yet approved by the Bechtel design engineer.

(Paragraph 5)

B.

Material Storage

The inspector stated that several components for Class I structures were

observed, apparently due to inadequate shoring, to be stored in contact

with the ground. The licensee stated that this situation would be

corrected immediately.

(Paragraph 6)

C.

Class I Piping

The inspector said that, according to Mr. Stephens, erection of Class I

piping (originally schaduled to start in early thy 1972) may be delayed

pending final approval of some sections of the Grinnell Field QA/QC

Manual and further refinement of the contract with Grinnell.

According

to Stephens, the inspector added, contract refinement relates to the

interface between the piping work to be performed by Grinnell and that

to be perfor=ed by Babcock and Wilcox.

The licensee could add no

additional information with respect to this matter.

The inspector

said that this item would be reviewed during subsequent inspections.

-

D.

Waste Gas Decav Tanks

/'~'T

The inspector stated that he had completed a review of the quality

\\s_,)

documentation for the waste gas decay tanks and, although installation

had not been started, he noted that the material certification records

for the flange bolts were missing.

Mr. Martin said that a search for

the missing record had been unfruitful but that another copy would be

obtained and would be available for review during the next inspection.

(Paragraph 7)

E.

Steam Generator Supports

During a review of the material certification records for the steam

generator support components, the inspector stated, it was impossible

to establish the qualification of the NDT technician (s) performing

shop ultraconic examination on 24 of the components.

Mr. Martin said

that the qualification records had been reviewed by the Tachtel shop

inspector, but this fact had not been documented.

He add 2 that the

3

missing documentation would be obtained and made available for review

at the site during the next inspection.

(Paragraph 8)

-5-

OL.)

.

_.

-.

._

_.

.

.

\\s_s

SECTION II

.

(

Additional Subjects Inspected, Not Identified in Section I, Where No

Deficiencies or Unresolved Items Were Found

1.

General

Construction Status as of March 31, (972

a.

Engineering - 79% complace (overall)

Construction - 18% complete (overall)

b.

Personnel Changes

Mr. D. P. Eisenhardt, previously a Bechtel QC Engineer, transferred

,

to the position of Mechanical Coordinator in the Field Coordination

group. A Mr. R. L. Lykens has replaced Mr. Eisenhardt.

Mr. H. A. Ablondi, a QA Engineer specializing in piping and

welding, was recently hired by Bechtel and has now been assigned

!

!

to the site.

2.

Class I Concrete

g

a.

Record Review

(1)

Concrete Strength Tests and Slump Tests

(2)

Proper Mix Specified and Delivered

(3) Mortar Cube Test Results

(4)

Batch Plant Inspection Reports

(5) Cement Test Reports

3.

Other Class I Structures - Steam Generator Support Structure Embedments

a.

QC System

(1) Material Chemical Composition

(2) Material Physical Characteristics

-6-

,

,

.

. _ _ -

..

.

.

.-

-

. - .

.-

_

-.

.

't

!

.

.

.

i

s

(3) Material NDT

.

'

(4) Handling of Nonconforming Material

(5)

Storage Identification and Control

b.

Review of Records

'

(1) Material Certification

(2) Material NDT Records (excluding technical qualifications)

(3)

Purchase Specifications

(4) Receiving Inspection Reports

(5)

Shop Inspection Reports

(6) Nouconformance Reports and Resolutions

c.

Observation of Work

(1)

Quarantine of Nonconforming Components

(2)

Protection of Components in Storage

s_s

4.

TECO QA Audit Reports - Site

TECO reports for five audits of the Pittsburgh Testing Laboratory site

facility, covering the period from December 17, 1970, to January 26,

1972, and one audit report on Bechtel site receipt inspection of the

,

steam generator support embedments were reviewed.

Details of Subjects Discussed in Section I

5.

Possible Low Compressive Strength Concrete

"

Following the previous inspection in regard to this item, TECO notified

the RO:III office that Bechtel, in consultation with TECO and the

,

Medusa Cement Company, had traced the cause of the low seven-day concrete

cylinder test results to low tricalcium silicate content in the cement.

As a result of this finding, cement stocks were replaced, and revised

sampling and testing procedures were placed into effect to prevent

reoccurence (see Report No. 346/72-01).

During the current inspection,

implementation and results of these changes were reviewed.

In addition,

-7-

)

'

s- /

i

i

,

. , _

._

..

. _ . _ _ . . _ .

_ . _ , _ _ . . _ .

,

.

_

_ _ _ _ . . _ , _ . . . , . _

..

-

_

_

.

.

l

- 's

.

)

the compressive strength test results for two Class I concrete pours

made after the concrete production stop order was. rescinded were

reviewed and were found to meet specifications. The concrete produc-

tion stop order was rescinded on January 24, 1972.

Nonconformance report No. 43 was issued by Bechtel when it was found

that the 28-day compressive strength test results for 4 of 15 test

cylinders, representing the 810-yard pour, No. 557, did not meet the

specified design strength requirements of 5000 psig. The disposition

of the nonconformance report waa reviewed and found to be in agreement

with established procedures. The concrete (pour No. 557) was accepted

"as is", based on the fact that the 90-day test results exceeded the

design requirements and that the test results from the investigation

supported the conclusion that the cement used exhibits Type V

characteristics,

i.e.,

low early strength and high late strength.

Production of concrete to requirements is no longer questioned. However,

the final approved copies of the revised sampling and testing procedures,

approved and in use on an interim basis, had not been received onsite

at the time of the inspection. This item remains open pending review of

the final approved procedures.

,

i

6.

Material Storage

During the current inspection, the inspector noted that some components

.

for Class I structures were stored in contact with the ground. Apparr-*1y,

shoring below the.se components had sunk into the ground.

The components

included the main air lock door penetration, reinforcement steel, and

4

domed sections of containment vessel plate.

Prior to the conclusion of

,

!

the inspection, corrective action was in progress and correct storage

was completed within two weeks.

!

l

7.

Waste Gas Decay Tanks

!

A follow-up inspection of the waste gas decay tact.s (T-24, T-25-1, 2,

and 3, currently in storage) was made to complete a review of material

certification records which had been started during the inspection of

January 11 - 12, 1972.

During the current inspection, it was noted

that the material certification records for the flange bolts were missing

for all four tanks.

The bolt material specification is ASTM A-307.

The receiving inspection report, signed by Mr. Arenson, indicated that

the bolt material records had been received, but a search by Bechtel

was unsuccessful.

Mr. Martin said that additional copies would be

obtained and that they should be available for review during the next

inspection.

-8-

!

l _

_

,

,

. , , _

_-

-_-

- - - - - - .

- - - - . -

-

-

.

.

.

.

__,'

i

8.

Steam Generator Supports

'

_

A review of the material nondestructive test records (NDT) and the

Bechtel shop inspector reports could not verify that the NDT tech-

nician(s) performing the shop ultrasonic examinations en 24 components

for the steam generator supports were properly qualified.

The com-

ponents involved were the sole plates (two pieces), anchor ring plates

i

(two peices), reinforcing bars (four pieces), and the , anchor plates

-

(sixteen pieces). The NDT technician (s) in question varked for the

Arnold Greene Testing Laboratory, and the UT examination was conducted

in accordance with ASTM A-435.

i

Mr. Martin stated that he was sure the qualfication records had been

'

reviewed by the shop inspector but that he evidently had failed to

document the fact. He added that the missing documentation would be

obtained and made available for review during the next inspection at

'

the site.

l

i,

,

i

1

-9-

,

--

--

.

--

.-

-