ML19295G103
| ML19295G103 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 11/05/1980 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19295G100 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900100 NUDOCS 8012180615 | |
| Download: ML19295G103 (2) | |
Text
L1=1 torque Corporation Docket No. 99900100/80-02 NOTICE OF DEVIATIONS 3ased on the results of an NRC inspection conducted on September 30 - October 3, 1980, it appears that certain of your activities were not cenducted in accordance with NRC require =ents.
Criterion V of Appendix 3 to 10 CFR 50 states:
" Activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by docu=ented instructions, procedures, or drawings, of a type appropriate to the circumstances and shall be accomplished in accordance with these iastructions, procedures, or drawings.
Instructions, pro-cedures, or drawings shall include appropriate quantitative or qualitative acceptance criteria for determining that important activities have been satisfactorily accomplished."
Deviations from these requirements are as follows :
A.
Subprocedure QCP-4.C paragraph 4.C. l.21, with regard to variation reports, states, " Manufacturing Supervisor Approval - The VR, af ter being co=pleted is to be given to the supervisor in the department where the variation occurs or has been found, for his approval of the charge.
Note: The notation "N. A." should be used when any of the above steps does not apply to the material being written up on the VR - it can also be used whcn infor=ation is not avsilable.
This will indicate that a step was not missed or over looked while filling in the Variation Report."
Contrary to the above; two (2) variaticu reports, No. 52812 and No. 53675, which originated in the sachine shop, did not contain the Manufacturing Supervisor's Approval signature in the block designated for it on the repor; f orm, nor was the~ notation "N. A." included in the block step to show that the signature did not apply.
3.
Subprocedure 1CP-13.3, paragraph 13.3.1, with regard to Material Review Board (MRB) Reports, states, "(b) signatures - signatures of all M.R.3, members is (sic) required on this report."
Contrary to the above, five (5) M.R.3. Repcrts Nos. 018 through No. 022, were not signed by all of the =e=bers in attendance for each =eeting.
C.
The QA Manual Section 10, paragraph 3.1.3, with regard to membership of the M.R.3.,
requires that the M.R.3. shall include a representative of the Manufacturing Engineering group.
Contrary to the above, che list of M.R.3, sembers identified in M.R.3.
Report No. 22 and other reports did not include a representative of the Manufacturing Engineering group.
s 01 n 80 GI6
2 D.
Procedure QCP-14, paragraph 14.2.3, with regard to internal audits, states,
"'4 hen ' Audit Deficiency Notifications' are completed, the Quality Control Manager will perform a follow-up audit within 30 days after receipt of the completed ' Audit Deficiency Notification'."
Contrary to the above, a follov-up audit was not performed within 30 days of receipt of completed Aucit Deficiency Notifications for three (3) items that had been identified during a July 29, 1980, audit of the Limitorque Manufacturing Planc, i.e. Item Nos. G.3, F.5 and C.S.