ML19289D977
| ML19289D977 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 12/26/1978 |
| From: | Hunter V, Whitesell D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19289D970 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900320 NUDOCS 7903210188 | |
| Download: ML19289D977 (5) | |
Text
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY C0" MISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT REGION IV Report No.
99900320/78-01 Program No.
51300 Company:
Engineers and Fabricators Company 3501 West lith Street Houston, Texas 77008 Inspection Conducted:
December 4-7, 1978 Inspector:
3/
M.5 6'[
/dd6-7[
V. H. Ffunter, Contractor Inspector, Vendor Date Inspection Branch Approved by: NN M4/->
/2 26 7[
v
- 0. E. Whitesell, Chief,'Comoonent Section i Date Vendor Inspection Branch Summary Inspection on December 4-7, 1978 (99900320/78-01)
Areas Inspected:
Implementation of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B and applicable Codes and standards including, review of previous inspection findings, manufacturing process control, and calibration control.
The inspection involved twenty-eight (28) inspector-hours on site.
Results:
In the three areas inspected, no apparent deviations or unresolved items were identified in one area:
the following deviations were identified in the remaining two (2) areas.
Deviations: Manufacturing Process Centrol - Failure to fabricate Components in the required controlled sequence in accordance with Criterion V of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, as implemented by the ASME accepted QA Manual.
(Enclosure, Item A).
Calibration Control - Failure to prepare and maintain a master list of equipment / tools in accordance with Criterion XII of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 and implementing procedure IP-XII-02.
(Enclosure, Item B).
7903239JQ
.s
-2_
DETAILS A.
Persons Contacted
- E.
P. Hansen, President
- C. A. Haas, Quality Assurance Manager
- R. T. Smith, Quality Assurance Administrator
- J. VanAlstyne, Vice President, Operations B. O. Reichle, Tool Room Fireman C. W. Goodwin, Shop Clerk H. Mazoch, Weld Technician R. W. Lamberth, Shop Superintendant
- Denotes those present at the Exit Interview Meeting.
B.
Action on Previous Inspection Findings 1.
(Closed) Deviation (Report No. 77-01):
Failure to provide vendor personnel qualifications. The inspector verified that this requirement had been deleted from the QA Manual.
2.
(Closed) Deviation (Report No. 77-01):
Failure to issue the required implementing procedures handbook to the Quality Control Foreman.
The inspector verified that all implementing procedure handbooks issued were signed out, dated, Current, and apparently being followed.
3.
(Closed) Deviation (Report No. 77-01):
Failure to conduct the required management audit.
The inspector verified that the referenced audit had been conducted on December 19, 1977, and that a current schedule exsisted that was dated November 21, 1978.
4.
(Closed) Deviation (Report No. 77-01):
Failure to perform system audits. The inspector verifed that the referenced audits were performed and that the ASME accepted QA Manual had been revised to reflect current schedules of system audits.
5.
(Closed) Deviation (Report No. 77-01): Educational and work experience records were not available for NDE personnel.
The inspector verified that all necessary records for NDE personnel were in the files and met the requirements of SNT-TC-1A.
6.
(Closed) Deviation (Report No. 77-01): Failure of engineering department to submit a training plan. The inspector verified that a current training plan had been su'mitted by engineering dated December 12, 1977, and that training sessions had been conducted on 1-78, 6-78, and 11-78.
o
-3, 7.
(Closed) Deviation (Report No. 77-01):
Failure to conduct required training sessions. The inspector reviewed the current training schedule and found that all required training sessions for 1978 had been conducted.
C.
Manufacturing Process Control 1.
Objectives The objectives of this area of the inspection were to verify that the vendor's manufacturing processes are performed under a controlled system which meets the NRC regulations, ASME Code requirements, and contract requirements, and is effective in assuring product quality.
2.
Method of Accomolishment The objectives of this area of the inspection were accomplished by:
a.
Review of the ASME accepted QA Manual, dated t,avember 30, 1978:
(_1)Section V, titled " Document Control" (2)
Section VIII, titled " Identification and Control of Items" (3)Section IX, titled " Control of Construction Process",
to verify that procedures had been established that prescribe a control system of the manufacturing processes.
b.
Review of these selective procedures:
(1) 1P-1X-01, Revision 0 (2)
IP-1X-02, Revision 0
(.3) 1P-1X-03, Revision 0, to verify the control system requires shop travelers or process control check list be prepared containing document numbers and revisions to which the process must confom and requires all processes and test to be preformed by qualified personnel using qualified procedures.
- c.
Review of the shop traveler or process control check list to verify it has spaces for reporting results of specific operations or reference to other documents where results are maintained, it includes previsions for signoff by the vendor indicating the date on which the operation or test was performed, and it provides for signoff by the authorized nuclear inspector for those activities which he witnesses including the date of witnessing.
d.
Review of these selective shop travelers:
(1)
Shop order 18385 (2)
Shop order 18386 (3)
Shop order 18384, to verify their compliance with the above referenced procedures, and the overall QA program documentation requirements including establishment of mandatory hold points by the authorized nuclear inspector.
Interviews with personnel to verify they were knoweledgeable e.
in the procedures applicable to manufacturing process control.
f.
Observed the insertion of tube bundle into shell for an RHR heat exchanger identified on shop order 18388.
It was observed that this operation was conducted in accordance with procedure FP-505, revision 0 and drawing 12475-2, revision O.
3.
Findings a.
Deviation From Commitment Refer to Enclosure Item A.
b.
Unresolved Item None were identified.
D.
Calibration 1.
Inspection Objectives The objectives of this inspection were to:
a.
Ascertain that a system has been established and is maintained to assure that tools, gages, instruments and other measuring devices used in activities affecting quality are properly
_ controlled, calibrated and adjusted at specified periods to maintain accuracy within specified limits.
b.
Verify that the system described in (a) above, has been adequately documented with approved procedures and that these procedures are being implemented.
2.
Objectives Accomolished by:
a.
Review of Section XII, of the ASME accepted QA Manual to verify that procedures had been established to assure that tools, gages, instruments and other measuring devices used in activities affecting quality are properly controlled, calibrated and adjusted at specific periods.
b.
Review of these selected procedures:
(1)
IP-XII-01, Revision 0 (2)
IP-XII-02, Revision 0 (3)
IP-XII-03, Revision 0, to verify that the calibration control system has been adequately documented with approved procedures and that these procedures are being implemented.
3.
Findings a.
Deviation Refer to Enclosure Item 3.
b.
Unresolved Item Ncne were identified.
E.
Exit Interview At the conclusion of the inspection on December 7,1978, the inspector met with the vendor's management representatives identified in paragraph A.
The inspector informed vendor representatives of the two (2) deviations identified and supporting documentation for same. The vendors representatives acknowledged the findings, and offered no further comments.