ML19224D085
| ML19224D085 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Browns Ferry  |
| Issue date: | 07/03/1979 |
| From: | Mills L TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY |
| To: | Ippolito T Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7907100615 | |
| Download: ML19224D085 (3) | |
Text
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY CH ATTA NOOGA. TEN N ESSEE 374o1 400 Chestnut Street Tower II JUL 3 1979 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention:
Mr. Thomas A. Ippolito, Chief Branch No. 3 Division of Operating Reactors U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555
Dear Mr. Ippolito:
In the Matter of the
)
Docket Nos. 50-259 Tennessee Valley Authority
)
50-260 The proposed program of hydrostatic pressure testing for Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant unit 1 was submitted for your review by letter from J. E. G111 eland to you dated March 20, 1979. That program is also applicable to unit 2 and should be considered as the proposed hyarostatic pressure testing program for both units 1 and 2.
The fees for review of the unit 1 hydrostatic pressure testing program did not accompany the proposed program at the time of submittal. A request for TVA to forward Class III fees was made in a letter from Reba M. Diggs of the Licensing Fee Management Branch to H. G. Parris, Manager of Power, dated May 10, 1979. This request has been complied with. In accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR Section 170.12, we have dete~ mined, therefore, that the above requested action for unit 2 is a Class 1 action. This classification is based on the fact that the requested action for unit 2 is a duplicate of the requested action submitted on March 20, 1979, for unit 1.
The remittance for $400 is being wired to the NRC, Attention: Licensing Fee Fbnagement Branch.
Enclosed are revised Requests for Relief H-9 and H-ll to the Browns Ferry units 1 and 2 hydrostatic precsure testing program. This replaces pages submitted by the March 20, 1979, letter.
Very truly yours, TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY L7'$. Mills,Manaker Nuclear Regulation and Safety Enclosures 7907100615
-5 !?o I V
/
Li / {
An Ecual Occortunity Employer
s<
Request for Relief H-9 SYSTEM -
EECW CLASS -
3 TEST REQUIREMENT - Hydro testing of short sections of piping to/from the following components:
Control Bay Chillers -
Between:
1-67-653 and 1-67-651 Unit 1 and 2 Diesels -
Between:
1-67-527 and 1-67-529 l-67-629 and 1-67-631 1-67-513 and 1-67-515 1-67-626 and 1-67-628 BASIS FOR RELIEF The Control Bay Chillers re not safety related equipment, and the EECW serces >nly as an alter-nate heat sink for the Chiller Condenser.
There is no way to postulate overpressurization of this piping. Due to the valving arrangement there is no practical way to test this piping.
The piping to the Diesels can't be practically tested without removing all four diesels from service at the same time, which violates
~
Technical Specifications. There is no postulated event which could overpressurice this piping.
ALTERNATE TEST 15G None
,q' j '/ '
di)
Ii
REQUEST FOR RELIEF H-ll (Request '41thdrawn)
JLr e) 7)j 'r ".
i tw