ML19208A488
| ML19208A488 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 08/16/1979 |
| From: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | TEXAS PIPE BENDING CO. OF PUERTO RICO (SUBS. OF BENDI |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7909140103 | |
| Download: ML19208A488 (1) | |
Text
_
UNITED ST ATES j
/
'o, l'
'j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION ll e
101 M ARIETT A ST., N W., SUIT E 3100
[
0 ATLANT A, GEORGI A 30303 be g*
AUG 161979 TEXAS PIPE BENDING COMPANY OF PUERT EIAL ANON HIGHMAY 511 PDNCE PR 00731 The enclosed Circular No. 79-16 is forwarded to you for inforration.
If there are any questions related to your understanding of the suggested action, please contact this office.
Sincerely, M
Q James P. O'Reilly Director
Enclosures:
1.
IE Circular No. 79-16 2.
Listing of IE Circulars Issued in last Six Months T3330Il 7 0 0914 0 (e>3
Accession No. 7908020542 SSINS:
6830 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENF3 CEMENT WASHINGTON, D.C.
20555 August 16, 1979 IE Circular No. 79-16 EXCES4IVE RADIATION EXPOSURES TO MEMBERS OF THE fiENERAL PUBLIC AND A RADIOuRAPHER Description of Circumstances:
During radiographic operations using 40 curies of iridium-192, the source became disconnected unbeknownst to the radiographer--he did not use his survey instrument.
After the radiographer left the facility, an employee of the customer for which radiography was performed, saw the source and, not knowing what it was, picked it up and placed it in his hip pocket. He carried it about for approximately two hours, later giving it to his supervisor to examine. While making a deter-mination that it was something which belonged to the radiographer, and while waiting fear the radiographer to pick up the source, nine employees of the radio-grapher's customer were exposed. The source was also left with a secretary who instructed to contact the radiographer. The radiographer returned, examined was and took the source assuring the customer's employees that there was no problem, stating that the source was a "detectu On the evening of the event, the employee who had put the source in his pocket became nauseous and went to a hospital for treatment. At that time a blister was found on his buttock. The initial diagnosis and treatment was for an insect Thirty one days af ter this initial treatment the individual was hospitalized bite.
for treatment of the injury to his buttock. At that time the individual asked the physicians if there could be any connection of the injury to the radiography that had been performed at his place of work one month previously. An investigation followed which disclosed the above information.
The individual who had carried the source in his pocket remains under medical care following surgery. The attending physician does not consider the exposure to be life threatening. Neither does amputation appear necessary. The localized dose is estimated to be 1.5 million rem at skin surface, 60,000 rem at 1 cm depth and 7,000 rem at 3 cm depth. Estimated whole body doses to other individuals ranged from 1 to 60 rem.
Hand doses ranged to 5,000 rem. The radiographer received estimated doses of 14 rem to the whole body and 50 ren to the hands.
DUPLICATE DOCUMENT 7:]gg Entire docuraent previously entered into system under:
ANO NO601CS42 No. of pages:
6
....