ML18134A323

Conversation Record with S. Jurek/Xcel Energy Clarification Call with Xcel Energy on RAI 1 Response in Regard to Monticello Exemption Request for DSCs 11-15

ML18134A323
Person / Time
Site:	Monticello
Issue date:	05/14/2018
From:	Christian Jacobs Spent Fuel Licensing Branch
To:	Jurek S Xcel Energy
Jacobs C
References
Download: ML18134A323 (1)

Text

NRC FORM 699 ~

(03-2013) f g

~

\\; '/

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULA TORY COMMISSION CONVERSATION RECORD NAME OF PERSON(S) CONTACTED OR IN CONTACT VIIITH YOU DATE OF CONTACT Shane Jurek 05/10/2018 E-MAIL ADDRESS TELEPHONE NUMBER shaneJurek@xenuclear.com (612) 330-5788 ORGANIZATION DOCKET NUMBER(S)

Xcel Energy 72-58 LICENSE NUMBER(S)

CONTROL NUMBER(S)

SUBJECT DATE OF SIGNATURE 05/14/2018 TYPE OF CONVERSATION DE-MAIL

[ZJ TELEPHONE D

INCOMING D

OUTGOING Clarification Call with Xcel Energy (XE) on RAI # 1 response in regard to Monticello Exemption request for DSCs 11-15.

Participants:

Christian Jacobs (NRC)

John Mc.Kirgan (NRC)

Darrell Dunn (NRC)

Meraj Rahimi (NRC)

Anthony Rigato (NRC)

David Tang (NRC)

Martone Davis (NRC)

Norma Garcia Santos (NRC)

Rhex Edwards (NRC)

Matt Learn (NRC)

Hipolito Gonz.alez (NRC)

Paul Zurawski (NRC)

Continue on Page 2 ACTION REQUIRED (IF ANY)

Shane Jurek (XE)

Jim Bridgeman (XE)

Randy Garding (XE)

Pete Glass (XE)

Scott Marty (XE)

Marty Murphy (XE)

Sara Scott (XE)

Paul Young (XE)

David Segletes (Structural Integrity Associates)

Jay Silberg (Pillsbury Law)

Xcel Energy will supplement the response to first round RAI # 1 in regard to the Monticello Exemption request for DSCs 11-15 by May 31, 2018.

Continue on Page 3 NAME OF PERSON DOCUMENTING CONVERSATION Christian Jacobs SIGNATURE ~ I~

NRC FORM 699 (03-2013)

I Page 1 of 2

NRC FORII 699 (03-2013)

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULA TORY COMMISSION CONVERSATION RECORD (continued)

SUMMARY

(Continued from page 1)

A clarification call requested by NRC staff was held on May 10, 2018, with the Xcel Energy (XE) to seek clarification on responses to a request for additional information (RAJ # 1) in regard to the Monticello Exemption request for DSCs 11-15.

NRC staff requested clarification on the following (refer to ML18121A250 for list ofNRC questions discussed during the call).

XE provided following responses:

RAJ M-1: XE provided clarification that Section IX of the ASME code does not require a weld procedure qualification record (PQR) to identify which weld procedure specification(s) (WPS) are supported by the PQR. A WPS is required to identify the PQR. Based on the clarification provided, NRC staff is not requesting supplemental information for RAI M-1.

RAI M-3: XE provided clarification that a minimum weld design thickness of3/16" was used for all downstream calculations for DSCs 11-15. Based on the clarification provided, NRC staff is not requesting supplemental information for RAI M-3.

RAI M-4: XE agreed to supplement the RAI M-4 response to clarify "rework" vs "repair" or "conditioning" for DSC 12, specifically in regards to layer 2a and 2c. In addition, NRC staff had a follow-up question requesting XE to describe what is a "hot pass" in of the response to RAI M-4? XE agreed to include the description of a hot pass in their supplemental response.

RAI M-5: XE agreed to supplement RAI M-5 response to provide clarifying language for the inconsistent use of "repairs" versus "rework" or "conditioning" of welds. XE can address each instance of apparent inconsistent use, or provide a high level clarification that generically cleans up what was intended to be said.

RAI M-6: XE provided clarification to the 1st clarification question for RAI M-6. Regarding the 2nd clarification question:

Structural Integrity Associates (SIA) previously had technical difficulties viewing the general area video of DSC 12. However, during this call, NRC became aware that XE revisited the historical video files and was able to resolve the technical difficulties enabling XE subject matter experts to view the general area video for DSC 12. XE agreed to provide a summary of the restored video to NRC as a supplemental response to RAI M-6.

XE has agreed to provide the above identified supplemental information (i.e. RAI M-4, RAI M-5 and RAI M-6) by May 31, 2018 to the 72-58 docket to support the NRC staff's completion of the review of the Monticello Exemption request for DSCs 11-15.

Transmittal of supplemental information should include the following:

CAC: 001028 Docket: 72-58 EPID: L-2017-LLE-0029 NRC FORM 699 (03-2013)

Page2 of 2