ML17170A292

2017 Perry Nuclear Power Plant Initial Licensed Operator Examination Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist ES-301-4

ML17170A292
Person / Time
Site:	Perry  (NPF-058)
Issue date:	06/14/2017
From:	David Reeser NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:	FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
Shared Package
ML16242A231	List: ML17163A397 ML17164A052 ML17164A060 ML17164A063 ML17164A117 ML17164A128 ML17170A289 ML17170A292 ML17170A296 ML17170A299
References
Download: ML17170A292 (1)

Text

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES301-4 Facility: Perrv Date of Exam: Feb 2017 Scenario Numbers:

1 / 2 / 3 OperatinQ Test No.: 2017-01 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a

b*,

c#

1.

The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of 11n..... ~/~ t service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

v CIL <P-

2.

The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

IAn/..

3.

Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew

{r\\

~

the expected operator actions (by shift position)

?'

the event termination ooint (if aoolicable) tii~V

. ef Q lj

?:t.....

4.

The events are valid with reoard to Phvsics and thermodynamics.

'j"

5.

Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain

~ f l'.5-comolete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

'\\

6.

If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

fl Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

IJ/Y

?&-

i...-

Cues are qiven.

7.

The simulator modelinQ is not altered.

I~

,~, ~

z.....

8.

The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator i

tY' performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure lA1Y that functional fidelity is maintained while runninq the planned scenarios.

,\\.

9.

Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other WJV"'

QI~ 9u.

scenarios have been altered iri accordance with Section 0.5 of ES-301.

10.

All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit ~

.~~

9'c:i~

the form alonq with the simulator scenarios).

11.

The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the

~

applicable rating factors. (Competency Rating factors as described on forms ES-303-1 and 11r' t~

i...-

ES-303-3.)

j

12.

Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events virV fiJ.-

soecified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

r,\\i

13.

The level of difficulty is aoorooriate to support licensinq decisions for each crew position.

~

f/,/1 <1'~ y Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d)

Actual Attributes

-?/)

2 I 2 I 1 1Y'.A

'I g,,~

1.

Malfunctions after EOP entrv (1-2)

'>J

2.

Abnormal events (2-4) 4 I 3 I 4

~

/

4-' J"

3.

Maior transients (1-2) 2 I 2 I 2 tiff" -~

~

4.

EOPs entered/requirina substantive actions (1-2) 1 I 2 I 1

.~ )q

~ tj._

5.

EOP continoencies reouirina substantive actions (0-2) 1 I 1 I 0

(?_/ )<,,.; (1-i:J

6.

EOP based Critical tasks (2-3) 3 I 4 I 2 l,,fYI/ _;~~ a,,j i..-

NOTE:

• The facility signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence reauired.

NU REG 1021, Rev. 10 Page 1 of 1 FENOC Facsimile