ML102250262
| ML102250262 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Dresden  |
| Issue date: | 03/08/2010 |
| From: | Walton R NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML093010526 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML102250262 (11) | |
Text
2010 DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION INIT1AL EXAM1NATION ADMINISTRATIVE FILES
ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 I L Developed by: Written - Facility Target 3~~~
NRC
~
1 // Operating - Facility '1NRC L Chief Date* Task Description (Reference) Examiner's Initials
- ~ ~~ ~~
- 1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2 a and b)
~
-120 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e)
~
I (luw
-120 3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c)
-120 4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d) P W
[-901 [5. Reference material due (C.l .e; C.3.c; Attachment 3)) d\ 4
(-751 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-l's, ES-401-112, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as applicable (C.1.e and f; C.3.d)
I-701 (7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e))
{-45} 8. Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6, and any Form ES-201-3 updates), and reference materials due (C.l.e, f, g and h; C.3.d)
-30 9. Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due ((2.1.I; C.2.g; ES-202) I FUd
-14 10. Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.l; C.2.i; ES-202)
-14 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.f)
-14 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g) I at>
L- 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h) 1 f?k'
,-I
- 14. Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if 210) applications audited to confirm qualifications I eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent (C.2.i; Attachment 5; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204)
~
- 15. Proctonng/writtenexam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee (C.3.k)
-7 16. Approved scenarios,job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i)
I
' Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.
[Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC.
ES-201,Page 25 of 28
ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3
- 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of S - h i s e % s of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
- 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) o f s - l ? = E l l , J - ~ r o m the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provid; performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY NOTES:
ES-201,Page 27 of 28
ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3
- 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 3-@wa4-%s of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
- 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) O f J - l ? - M , J y r O m the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provid; performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE J
NOTES:
ES-201 Page 27 of 28
ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3
- 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) 0f+P-w,3~~% of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
- 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of
- t c i , J e . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE ES-201, Page 27 of 28
ES-401 Record of Rejected WAS Form ES-401-4 Tier I Randomly Reason for Rejection Group Selected WA 2I 1 21 1000.A2.03 This WA was rejected due to oversampling with SRO portion of Tier 2 RO Group 1. 21 1000.A2.05 was randomly selected as a replacement.
3 Generic.2.3.14 This WA was rejected due to overlap with SRO Tier 3. Generic.2.3.12 was RO randomly selected as a replacement.
1/ 2 29501 1.G.2.4.01 This WA was rejected due to not being applicable to Dresden Station.
SRO 295013.G.2.4.01 was randomly selected as a replacement.
I I I I I I ES-401, Page 27 of 33
ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Item Description I Initials I. Clean answer sheets copied before grading
- 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
- 3. Applicants scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)
- 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 22% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, _+4%on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail
- 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified
- 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed NarneISignature Date 1 a. Grader
- b. Facility Reviewer(*) fJ IA 1 c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) 3 /1~9/20\0
- d. NRC Supervisor (*) 3/3///0
/ Y W
/
(*) The facility reviewers signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
ES-403,Page 6 of 6
0311 7110 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission - Region II ATTN : Operator Licensing Branch 2443 Warrenville Road - Suite 210 Lisle, IL 60532-4352 Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3 Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-19 and DPR-25 NRC Docket Nos.50-237 and 50-249
Subject:
Written Exam 2010-301 Challenges The station has completed exam analysis and it is not our intent to challenge any questions pertaining to the 2010-301 written exam, administered on 03/15/10.
RespectfuIIy, Mark Otten Operations Training Manager Dresden Station
Questions asked by candidates during administration of the Dresden Station 2010-301 NRC written Exam.
Simpson asked, reqardinq Question # 40:
Should t h e stem o f t h e question reference U2 or should t h e answer choices reference U3?
Reply supplied, with concurrence o f Chief Examiner:
The stem should read U2 and 2B (instead o f U3 and 3B).
Netemeyer asked, reqardinq Question #70:
Should t h e r e b e any supplied references f o r question #70?
Reply supplied, with concurrence o f Chief Examiner:
You have been supplied t h e appropriate references.
Exelc!m. TQ-AA-224-F200 Revision 1 Page 1 of 4 Nuclear Post Examination Test Item Analysis Individual Exam Analysis Lesson Plan / Course: I L T Class 09-1 (NRC 2010-301)
Examination No./
Title:
N R C Exam
- 1. Check the results of the examination.
a) 0 Small class (16)and some questions were missed by three (3) or more students. Analysis required for these questions.
b) Large class (>6) and some questions were missed by more than 30% of the class. Analysis required for these questions.
c) Analysis of questions requested by individual.
d) None of the above apply and no further analysis is necessary.
- 2. If an analysis is to be performed, list the question number(s) on the question analysis worksheet and review each using the following guidelines. Record the results on the worksheet.
Review each question to ensure it is worded clearly and is not ambiguous. Ensure that it is properly constructed. Refer to JA-AA-222-0020, Test Item Design and Approval Job Aid.
Review each question to ensure that it ties properly to the learning objectives condition, performance, and standard.
Review each question to ensure that it is technically accurate.
Review each question to ensure that adequate material was presented to allow for achievement of the associated learning objective.
- 3. Determine if action is required for problem questions (e.9. delete from examination bank; revise question, revise lesson plan, etc.). When action is required, ensure an assignment is initiated for documentation and tracking purposes.
Comments:
- #40 The incorrect unit was stated in stem. Change stem to Unit 2 (TR# 10-280).
TQ-AA-224- F200 Revision 1 Page 2 of 4 QUESTION ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Construction Objective Technically LP Content Change Question Number OK? Based? Accurate? Acceptable? Needed?
(Y - N) (Y - N) (Y - N) (Y - N) (Y - N) 9 Y Y Y Y N 35 Y Y Y Y N 40 N Y Y Y Y*
48 Y Y Y Y N 61 Y Y Y Y N Retention Requirement per SRRS ID 3D.100