ML071550106

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report, Report No. 64, January 1, 2006 Through December 31, 2006
ML071550106
Person / Time
Site: Peach Bottom  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 05/31/2007
From:
Exelon Nuclear
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML071550106 (104)


Text

Docket No:

50-277 50-278 PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 and 3 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report

.ý !ý ý - ' '; ý 1,4

' -4

7. '-.4ý.

I Report No. 64 1 January Through 31 December 2006 Prepared By Nuclear Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Delta, PA 17314 May 2007

TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Summary..............................................................................

I II. Introduction......................................................................................

3 A. Objectives.......................................................................................

3 B. Implementation.................................................................................

3 Ill. Program Description............................................................................

4 A. Sample Collection..............................................................................

4 B. Sample Analysis...............................................................................

6 C. Data Interpretation.............................................................................

6 D. Program Exceptions............................................................................

7 E. Program C hanges..................................................... 10 Kr+/-<ij~wV.Reultsandi~iscussio.n 3.A4 Fish........

14

4.

SedimcenWter..

12 B. At oshrickn Environment 13

1.

Airborn............................*..

13

a.

Aei re t...

Par.ic.ates.

13

b.

Airbornd e

Idim ne 14

2.

Atmoperretial...onmnt.............................................................

14

a.

Milke.........................................................................

14

b.

Food Par dcucates...........................................................

14 C. Ambiente Ga maR diaine 15 D.

Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) 15 E.

Land Use Census 16 F.

Summary of Results Inter-laboratory Comparison Program.........................

16 V.

References............................................................................

19 I -

Appendices Appendix A Tables Table A-1 Appendix B Tables Table B-1:

Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Summary Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Annual Summary for the Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 2006 Sample Designation and Locations Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Sampling Locations, Distance and Direction from Reactor Buildings, Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 2006 TableB-2..Radigica[Envirnmnhtal.MonitoringProgramý --

umma `ypffSampei7,&

A--

Collection and Analytical Methods, Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 2006 Figure B-i:

Figure B-2:

Figure B-3:

Appendix C:

Tables Table C-1.1 Table C-1.2 Table C-11.1 Table C-11.2 Environmental Sampling Locations within One Mile of the Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 2006 Environmental Sampling Locations Between One and Approximately Five Miles of the Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 2006 Environmental Sampling Locations Greater than Five Miles from the Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 2006 Data Tables and Figures - Primary Laboratory i

Concentrations of Tritium in Surface Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 2006.

Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Surface Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 2006.

Concentrations of Total Gross Beta Drinking Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 2006.

Concentrations of Tritium in Drinking Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 2006.

-ii-

Table C-11.3 Table C-111.1 Table C-IV.1 Table C-IV.2 Table C-V.1 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Drinking Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 2006.

Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Predator & Bottom Feeder (Fish)

Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 2006.

Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Sediment Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 2006.

Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Extended Sediment Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 2006.

Concentrations of Gross Beta in Air Particulate Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 2006.

-afC-V 2-"U

~M~thil""

WYd6641 Me ari10 pCi/cu meter) in Air Particulate Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 2006.

Table C-V.3 Table C-VI.1 Table C-VII.1 Table C-VII.2 Table C-VIII.2 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Air Particulate Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 2006.

Concentrations of 1-131 in Air Iodine Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 2006.

Concentrations of 1-131 in Milk Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 2006.

Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Milk Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 2006.

Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Food Product Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 2006.

Table C-IX.1 Quarterly TLD Results for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 2006.

Table C-IX.2 Table C-IX.3 Mean Quarterly TLD Results for the Site Boundary, Intermediate and Control Locations for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Site Boundary, 2006.

Summary of the Ambient Dosimetry Program for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 2006.

- iii -

Table C-X.1 Summary of Collection Dates for Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Bottom Power Station, 2006.

Figure C-1 Monthly Total Gross Beta Concentrations in Drinking Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of PBAPS, 2006.

Figure C-2 Mean Annual Cs-137 Concentrations in Fish Samples Collected in the Vicinity of PBAPS, 1971-2006.

Figure C-3 Mean Semi-Annual Cs-137 Concentrations in Sediment Samples Collected in the Vicinity of PBAPS, 1971-2006.

Figure C-4 Mean Weekly Gross Beta Concentrations in Air Particulate Samples Collected in the Vicinity of PBAPS, 2006.

y.

Mean Monthly-GrirssCBeta Qoncentrations. in Air-Particulate Samples ColJ'ctdi thricinityý f PBAPS 1 970OL2606.

Figure C-6 Mean Annual Cs-137 Concentrations in Milk Samples Collected in the Vicinity of PBAPS, 1971-2006.

Figure C-7 Mean Quarterly Ambient Gamma Radiation Levels (TLD) in the Vicinity of PBAPS, 1973-2006.

Figure C-8 Quarterly Ambient Gamma Radiation Levels (TLD) Near the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Located at PBAPS, 1998-2006.

Appendix D:

Data Tables and Figures - QC Laboratory Tables Table D-1.1 Concentrations of Total Gross Beta Drinking Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 2006.

Table D-1.2 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Drinking Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 2006.

Table D-11.1 Concentrations of Gross Beta in Air Particulate Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 2006.

Table D-11.2 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Air Particulate Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 2006.

- iv -

Table D-Ill.1 Table D-IV.1 Egur.s Figure D-1 Figure D-2 Concentrations of 1-131 by Chemical Separation and Gamma Emitters in Milk Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 2006.

Summary of Collection Dates for Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 2006.

Comparison of Monthly Total Gross Beta Concentrations in Drinking Water Samples Split between the Primary and QC Laboratories, 2006.

Comparison of Weekly Gross Beta Concentrations from Collocated Air Particulate Locations Split between the Primary And QC Laboratories, 2006.

-A,~ppendix-E-Qult-oto nter-Laboratory Comparison Program 111-Tables Table E-1 Table E-2 Table E-3 Table E-4 Table E-5 Appendix F Analytics Environmental Radioactivity Cross Check Program Teledyne Brown Engineering, 2006 ERA Environmental Radioactivity Cross Check Program Teledyne Brown Engineering, 2006 DOE's Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP)

Teledyne Brown Engineering, 2006 ERA Statistical Summary Proficiency Testing Program Environmental, Inc., 2006 DOE's Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP)

Environmental, Inc., 2006 Annual Radiological Groundwater Protection Program Report (ARGPPR)

Intentionally Left Blank i -

I.

Executive Summary This report on the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program conducted for the Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (PBAPS) by Exelon Nuclear covers the period 1 January 2006 through 31 December 2006. During that time period, 1,121 analyses were performed on 815 samples.

Surface water samples were analyzed for concentrations of tritium and gamma emitting nuclides. No tritium, fission or activation products were found.

Drinking water samples were analyzed for concentrations of gross beta, tritium, and gamma emitting nuclides. No fission or activation products were found. Gross beta and tritium activities detected were consistent with those observed in previous years.

The remaining sample media representing the aquatic environment included fish emitting nuclides. Fish samples showed no detectable fission or activation products from the operation of PBAPS. Cesium-137 activity was found at most sediment locations and was consistent with data from previous years. Low levels of Cs-137 and Co-60 activity were detected in sediment during extended sampling. The dose to a teenager's skin from the sediment pathway was calculated to be 5.01 E-03 mrem/year, which represents 0.025% of the allowable fraction of 10 CFR 50, Appendix I limits.

The dose to a teenager's whole body from the sediment pathway was calculated to be 4.26 E-03 mrem/year, which represents 0.071% of the allowable fraction of 10 CFR 50, Appendix I limits. The most likely source of the contamination is the RHR Heat Exchanger.

The atmospheric environment was divided into two parts for examination: airborne and terrestrial.

Sample media for determining airborne effects included air particulates and air iodine samples. Analyses performed on air particulate samples included gross beta and gamma spectrometry.

No fission or activation products were found. The gross beta results were consistent with results from the previous years. Furthermore, no notable differences between control and indicator locations were observed. These findings indicate no measurable effects from the operation of PBAPS.

High sensitivity Iodine-131 analyses were performed on weekly air samples. All results were less than the minimum detectable activity.

Examination of the terrestrial environment was accomplished by analyzing milk and food product samples. Milk samples were analyzed for low level concentrations of Iodine-131 and gamma emitting nuclides.

No activation or fission products were found. Food product samples were analyzed for concentrations of gamma emitting nuclides. Cs-137 was found at a low concentration in lettuce, attributed to the soil attached to the lettuce.

No Peach Bottom activation or fission products were detected.

Ambient gamma radiation levels were measured quarterly throughout the year.

Most measurements were below 10 mR/standard month and the results were consistent with those measured in previous years.

The results of the TLD monitoring program were used to determine if the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) had any measurable impact on the dose rate in the environs.

In assessing all the data gathered for this report and comparing these results with preoperational data, it was evident that the operation of PBAPS had no adverse radiological impact on the environment.

The first Annual Radiological Groundwater Protection Program Report (ARGPPR) is groundwater from the operation of PBAPS.

II.

Introduction Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (PBAPS) is located along the Susquehanna River between Holtwood and Conowingo Dams in Peach Bottom Township, York County, Pennsylvania. The initial loading of fuel into Unit 1, a 40 MWe (net) high temperature, gas-cooled reactor, began on 5 February 1966, and initial criticality was achieved on 3 March 1966.

Shutdown of Peach Bottom Unit 1 for decommissioning was on 31 October 1974.

For the purposes of the monitoring program, the beginning of the operational period for Unit 1 was considered to be 5 February 1966. A summary of the Unit 1 preoperational monitoring program was presented in a previous report (1). PBAPS Units 2 and 3 are boiling water reactors, each with a power output of approximately 1170 MWe. The first fuel was loaded into Peach Bottom Unit 2 on 9 August 1973.

Criticality was achieved on 16 September 1973, and full power was reached on 16 June 1974. The first fuel was loaded into Peach Bottom Unit 3 on 5 July 1974. Criticality was achieved on 7 August 1974, and full power was first reached on 21 December 1974.

and summarize the results of all analyses performed on samples collected from 5 February 1966 through 8 August 1973.

A Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) for PBAPS was initiated in 1966.

This report covers those analyses performed by Teledyne Brown Engineering (TBE), Global Dosimetry, and Environmental Inc. (Midwest Labs) on samples collected during the period 01 January 2006 through 31 December 2006.

A.

Objectives The objectives of the REMP are:

1.

Provide data on measurable levels of radiation and radioactive materials in the site environs.

2.

Evaluate the relationship between quantities of radioactive material released from the plant and resultant radiation doses to individuals from principal pathways of exposure.

B.

Implementation of the Objectives Implementation of the objectives is accomplished by:

1. Identifying significant exposure pathways.
2. Establishing baseline radiological data of media within those pathways.
3. Continuously monitoring those media before and during plant Station operation to assess Station radiological effects (if any) on man and the environment.

Ill.

Program Description A.

Sample Collection Normandeau Associates Inc., (NAI), collected samples for the PBAPS REMP for Exelon Nuclear. This section describes the general collection methods used by NAI to obtain environmental samples for the PBAPS REMP in 2006.

Sample locations and descriptions can be found in Table B-i, and Figures B-1 through B-3, Appendix B. The collection procedures used by NAI are listed in Table B-2, Appendix B.

The aquatic environment was evaluated by performing radiological analyses on samples of surface water, drinking water, fish, and sediment. Surface water from two locations (1LL and 1 MM) and drinking water from two locations (4L and 61) were collected weekly by automatic sampling equipment. Weekly samples from each of the surface and drinking water locations were composited into a separate monthly sample for analysis.

Approximately, two quarts of water were removed from the weekly' sample container and placed into a clean two-gallon polyethylene bottle to form a monthly composite.

Control locations were 1 LL and 61.

Fish samples comprising the flesh from two groups: Bottom Feeder (catfish) and Predator (smallmouth bass and largemouth bass) were collected semiannually from two locations: 4 and 6 (control). Sediment samples composed of recently deposited substrate were collected semiannually at three locations: 4J, 4T and 6F (control). An additional set of sediment samples was collected in December to validate results.

Atmospheric Environment The atmospheric environment was evaluated by performing radiological analyses on air particulate, airborne iodine and milk samples. Air particulate and air iodine samples were collected and analyzed weekly from five locations (1B, 1Z, 1C, 3A, and 5H2). The control location was 5H2. Airborne iodine and particulate samples were obtained at each location using a vacuum pump with charcoal and glass fiber filters attached.

The pumps were run continuously and sampled air at the rate of approximately 1 cubic foot per minute. The filters were replaced weekly and sent to the laboratory for analysis.

Milk samples were collected biweekly at five locations (J, 0, R, S and T) from April through November and monthly from December through March.

Six additional locations (B, C, D, E, L, and P) were sampled quarterly. Locations B, C, E and T were controls. All samples were collected in new unused two gallon plastic bottles from the bulk tank at each location, preserved with sodium bisulfite, and shipped promptly to the laboratory.

Food product samples were collected annually at three locations (1 Q, 2B, and 55) in October. All samples were collected in new unused plastic bags and shipped promptly to the laboratory.

Ambient Gamma Radiation Direct radiation measurements were made using Panasonic 814 calcium sulfate (CaSO4) thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD). The TLD locations were placed on and around the PBAPS site as follows:

A site boundaUry ring, consisting of 19 locations (IL, 1P, 1A, 1Q, 1D, 2, 1M, 1R, 11, 1C, 1J, 1K, 1F, 40, 1NN, 1H, 1G, 1B, and 1E), near and within the site perimeter representing fence post doses (i.e., at locations where the doses will be potentially greater than maximum annual off-site doses) from PBAPS releases.

An intermediate distance ring, consisting of 19 locations (15, 22, 44, 32, 45, 14, 17, 31A, 4K, 23, 27, 48, 3A, 49, 50, 51, 26, 6B, and 42), extending to approximately 5 miles from the site and designed to measure possible exposures to close-in population.

The balance of nine locations (2B, 43, 5, 16, 24, 46, 47, 18, and 19) representing control and special interests areas such as population centers, schools, etc.

The specific TLD locations were determined by the following criteria:

1.

The presence of relatively dense population;

2.

Site meteorological data taking into account distance and elevation for each of the 36 ten-degree sectors around the site, where estimated annual dose from PBAPS, if any, would be more significant;

3.

On hills free from local obstructions and within sight of the vents (where practical);

4.

And near the dwelling closest to the vents in the prevailing down wind direction.

Two TLDs - each comprised of three CaSO4 themoluminescent phosphors enclosed in plastic - were placed at each location in a Formica "birdhouse" or polyethylene jar located approximately six feet above ground level. The TLD sets were exchanged quarterly, then sent to the laboratory for analysis.

B.

Sample Analysis This section describes the general analytical methods used by Teledyne Brown Engineering and Environmental Inc. to analyze the environmental samples for radioactivity for the PBAPS REMP in 2006. The analytical procedures used by the laboratories are listed in Table B-2, Appendix B.

I In order to achieve the stated objectives, the current program includes the following analyses:

1.

Concentrations of beta emitters in drinking water and air particulates.

Cncentration of-gammia emnitting--nuchd&. ~i itrace and dikn water, air particulates, milk, fish, sediment and food products.

3.

Concentrations of tritium in surface and drinking water.

4.

Concentrations of 1-131 in air and milk.

5. -

Ambient gamma radiation levels at various site environs.

C.

Data Interpretation The radiological and direct radiation data collected prior to PBAPS becoming operational was used as a baseline with which these operational data were compared.

For the purpose of this report, PBAPS was considered operational at initial critically. In addition, data were compared to previous years' operational data for consistency and trending.

Several factors are important in the interpretation of the data. These factors were important in the interpretation of the data:

1.

I ower Limit of Detection and Minimum Detectable Concentration The lower limit of detection (LLD) was defined as the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that would yield a net count (above background) that would be detected with only a 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real" signal. The LLD was intended as a before the fact estimate of a system (including instrumentation, procedure and sample type) and not as an after the fact criteria for the presence of activity. All analyses were designed to achieve the required PBAPS detection capabilities for environmental sample analysis.

The minimum detectable concentration (MDC) is defined above with the exception that the measurement is an after the fact estimate of the presence of activity.

2.

Net Activity Calculation and Reporting of Results Net activity for a sample was calculated by subtracting background activity from the sample activity. Since the REMP measures extremely small changes in radioactivity in the environment, background variations will result in sample activity being lower than the background activity effecting a negative number. An MDC was reported in all cases where positive activity was not detected.

Gamma spectroscopy results for each type of sample were grouped as follows:

Fe-59, Co-60, Zn-65, Zr-95, Nb-95, 1-13, Cs-134 Cs-137.

Ba-140, and La-140 were reported.

For fish eight nuclides, K-40, Mn-54, Co-58, Fe-59, Co-60, Zn-65, Cs-1 34, and Cs-1 37 were reported.

For sediment six nuclides, K-40, Mn-54, Co-58, Co-60, Cs-134, and Cs-137 were reported.

For air particulate six nuclides, Be-7, Mn-54, Co-58, Co-60, Cs-134, and Cs-137 were reported.

For milk five nuclides, K-40, Cs-134, Cs-1 37, Ba-1 40, and La-140 were reported.

For food product seven nuclides, Be-7, Mn-54, Co-58, Co-60,1-131, Cs-134, and Cs-137 were reported.

Means and standard deviations of the results were calculated. The standard deviations represent the variability of measured results for different samples rather than single analysis uncertainty.

D.

Program Exceptions For 2006 the PBAPS REMP had a sample collection recovery rate of better than 99%. The exceptions to this program are listed below:

1. REMP air particulate filters did not meet the required LLD for the following samples (AR#578328):

03/20/06 - 03/27/06, Location 5H2 04/14/05 - 04/21/06, Location 3A 04/21/06 - 04/28/06, Location 3A 04/21/06 - 04/28/06, Location 1 C 05/19/06 - 05/26/06, Location 1 B

2. Four orifices used for the PBAPS air sampling program as part of the REMP failed their calibration. The flow orifices that failed are:

217004 (B) Station 1B Calibration data - 0.972 As found - 0.941 217052 (B) Station 1C Calibration data - 0.975 As found - 0.934 217051 (B) Station 3A Calibration data - 0.976 As found - 0.943 217027 (B) Trip Blank Calibration data - 0.970 As found - 1.011 The Out of Tolerance conditions are thought to be the result of corrosion on the admiralty brass orifice plates. The stainless steel orifice plates currently in use at other Exelon stations had a much lower rate of failure than the admiralty brass orifice plates. The corrective actions to switch to stainless steel orifice plates for all locations (AR578328578328.

3. The milk 1-131 LLD of 1.0 pCi/L was missed due to the discontinuation and poor performance of two types of filter paper used in the 1-131 analysis. Although sample aliquots were increased (up to 8 liters, when possible) and count times extended (up to 64 hours7.407407e-4 days <br />0.0178 hours <br />1.058201e-4 weeks <br />2.4352e-5 months <br />, in some cases), LLD requirements were missed due to low chemical yield and decay of the iodine during the investigation.

The actual values for the milk samples varied from 1.11 to 2.02 pCi/liter (AR#525342). TBE initiated NCR 06-13 to investigate and document this event. The following periods and locations were effected:

06/05/2006, Location J 06/05/2006, Location 0 06/05/2006, Location R 06/05/2006, Location S 06/05/2006, Location T 06/19/2006, Location T

4. The food product 1-131 LLD of 60 pCi/L was missed due to the discontinuation and poor performance of two types of filter paper used in the 1-131 analysis. Although sample aliquots were increased (up to 8 liters, when possible) and count times extended (up to 64 hours7.407407e-4 days <br />0.0178 hours <br />1.058201e-4 weeks <br />2.4352e-5 months <br />, in some cases), LLD requirements were missed due to low chemical yield and decay of the iodine during the investigation (AR#525342). TBE initiated NCR 06-13 to investigate and document this event. The following periods and locations were effected:

05/30/2006, Location 1Q, domestic grape leaves and poke weed 05/30/2006, Location 2B, ferns and tulip tree leaves 05/30/2006, Location 55, cabbage and peas

5. A food product sample showed 1-131 at a concentration of 124 +/- 35 pCi/kg wet due to the presence of a non-decaying beta emitter. The sample was recounted 12 days after the initial count and the activity was still present. Iodine-131 has a half-life of -8 days. The 1-131 should have experienced considerable decay (1 Y2 half-lives) over the 12 days between counting therefore the non-decaying beta emitter is not attributed to 1-131.

The analysis for 1-131 is a chemical separation followed by counting of betas.

It is thought that a long lived nuclide, proauby r

Wn phtie-,-,carried..jhroughi zthe.,.chemioal>

separation and gave the beta counts (AR#5423o).The fIIowing period and location was effected:

05/30/06, Location 1Q, peas

6. Two food product samples showed Cs-137 at concentrations of 8 +/- 5 pCi/kg wet (station 1Q lettuce) and 5 +/- 4 pCi/kg wet (station 2B lettuce) due to the extended count time (67 hours7.75463e-4 days <br />0.0186 hours <br />1.107804e-4 weeks <br />2.54935e-5 months <br />) required to meet 1-131 and La-140 detection limits due to limited sample volume. The Cs-137 would not have been detected with a normal count time of four to 10 hours1.157407e-4 days <br />0.00278 hours <br />1.653439e-5 weeks <br />3.805e-6 months <br /> and any Cs-137 that was quantified is considered to be in the soil that was adhering to the samples. The samples had been consumed for an 1-131 analysis (in order to achieve required 1-131 LLD) and reruns could not be performed. The vegetation program is new at Peach Bottom. It is known that there is Cs-137 in the soil as a legacy from atmospheric bomb testing. Sample results were well below the ODCM limits (AR#542286).

The following period and locations were effected:

07/03/06, Location 1 Q, lettuce 07/03/06, Location 2B, lettuce

7. The BVS sampler was out of service on 07/07/06 due to ground fault problems; manual sampling was therefore conducted. BVS was returned back to service on 07/20/06 (AR#507225).
8. A TLD sample container was destroyed at the Transco Pumping Station.

The station was probably destroyed by someone mowing the lawn in the area.

The TLDs were recovered and placed in a new container (AR#521937). The following period and location was effected:

08/17/06, Location 50

9. Manual sampling was initiated on 10/11/06 due to the BVS being removed from service. On 10/14/06 the BVS was returned to service (AR#507225).

Each program exception was reviewed to understand the causes of the program exception. Sampling and maintenance errors were reviewed with the personnel involved to prevent a recurrence.

Occasional equipment breakdowns and power outages were unavoidable.

E.

Program Changes There were no changes to the normal REMP program in 2006.

A separate program was instituted to monitor groundwater in the surrounding environs, during 2006. This program and any sampling and analsisresltsAe discussedinthe:

attac edrep o~rt7Anpuy~~dooicl_

Groundwater~ Protecti&Prgfrarn Repoft" IV.

Results and Discussion A.

Aquatic Environment

1.

Surface.Water Samples were taken from a continuous sampler at two locations (1 LL and 1 MM) on a monthly schedule. Of these locations, 1 MM located downstream, could be affected by Peach Bottom's effluent releases.

The following analyses were performed:

Tritium Monthly samples from both locations were composited quarterly and analyzed for tritium activity (Table C-I.1, Appendix C).

No tritium activity was detected.

Results ranged from <156 to <174 pCi/I and averaged 168 pCi/I at the control location and 167 pCi/I at the indicator location.

Gamma Spectrometry Samples from both locations were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-l.2, Appendix C). All nuclides were less than the MDC.

2.

Drinking Wate Monthly samples were collected from continuous water samplers at two locations (4L and 61).

One location (4L) could be affected by Peach Bottom's effluent releases.

The following analyses were performed:

Gros~sBet a Samples from both locations were analyzed for concentrations of total gross beta activity (Tables C-11.1 and Figures C-1 Appendix C). The values ranged from <1.9 to 4.0 pCi/I. Concentrations detected were generally below those detected in previous years.

Tritium analyzed for tritium activity (Table C-11.2, Appendix C).

No tritium activity was detected. Results ranged from <152 to <173 pCi/I and averaged 166 pCi/I at the control location and 166 pCi/I at the indicator location.

Gamma Spectrometry Samples from both locations were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-11.3, Appendix C). All nuclides were less than the MDC.

3.

Eish Fish samples comprised of bottom feeder (catfish) and predator (bass) were collected at two locations (4 and 6) semiannually.

Location 4 could be affected by Peach Bottom's effluent releases.

The following analysis was performed:

Gamma Spectrometry The edible portion of fish samples from both locations was analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-111.1, Appendix C).

Naturally occurring K-40 was found at all stations and ranged from 2,810 to 3,980 pCi/kg wet and was consistent with levels detected in previous years. No fission or activation products were found. Historical levels of Cs-137 are shown in Figure C-3, Appendix C.

4.

Sedoment Aquatic samples were collected at three locations (4J, 4T and 6F) semiannually. Of these locations two, 4J and 4T located downstream, could be affected by Peach Bottom's effluent releases. The following analysis was performed:

Gamma Spectrometry Sediment samples from all three locations were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-IV.1, Appendix C). Nuclides detected were naturally occurring K-40, Ra-226, Th-228 and Th-232.

Potassium-40 was found in all locations and ranged from 9,430 to 26,000 pCi/kg dry. Concentrations of the fission product Cs-137 were found at locations 4T and 6F. 4T had the highest average concentration Cs-137 of 168 pCi/kg dry. The activity of Cs-137 d~tete4Was onssten wih-tosedetetednrth -,prepperationa years. No other Peach Bottom fission or activation products were found. The shoreline doses due to the activity in the sediment were calculated using the methodology of Regulatory Guide 1.109, Calculation of Annual Doses to Man From Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance With 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I. The following nuclides concentrations (Pu-238, Pu-239, Pu-241, Am-241, Cm-242 and Cm-244, C-14, Ni-63 and Tc-99) were scaled from 10 CFR 61 analyses and added to the dose calculations. There was insignificant additional dose due to these additional nuclides.

5.

Extended Sediment Extended sediment sampling at various distances downstream of PBAPS discharge was done in 2006. Low levels of Cs-i 37 and Co-60 activity were detected in extended sediment samples.

Cesium-1 37 was found in four of 15 samples and ranged from 59 to 428 pCi/kg dry. Cobalt-60 was found in seven of 15 samples and ranged from 73 to 197 pCi/kg dry. The dose to a teenager's skin from the sediment pathway was calculated to be 5.01 E-03 mrem/year, which represents 0.025% of the allowable fraction of 10 CFR 50, Appendix I limits. The dose to a teenager's whole body from the sediment pathway was calculated to be 4.26 E-03 mrem/year, which represents 0.071% of the allowable fraction of 10 CFR 50, Appendix I limits. The most likely source of the contamination is the RHR Heat Exchangers.

12-

B.

Atmospheric Environment

a.

Air Particulates Continuous air particulate samples were collected from five locations on a weekly basis. The five locations were separated into three groups:

Group I represents locations within the PBAPS site boundary (1B, 1Z and 1C), Group II represents the location at an intermediate distance from the PBAPS site (3A),

and Group III represents the control location at a remote distance from PBAPS (5H2).

The following analyses were performed.

Weekly samples were analyzed for concentrations of beta emitters (Tables C-V.1 and C-V.2 and Figures C-5 and C-6, Appendix C).

Detectable gross beta activity was observed at all locations.

Comparison of results among the three groups aid in determining the effects, if any, resulting from the operation of PBAPS.

The results from the On-Site locations (Group I) ranged from <7 to 34 E-3 pCi/m 3, with a mean of 17 E-3 pCi/m 3.

The results from the Intermediate Distance location (Group II) ranged from <7 to 27 E-3 pCi/m 3 with a mean of 16 E-3 pCi/m 3.

The results from the Distant location (Group III) ranged from <7 to 26 E-3 pCi/m 3 with a mean of 15 E-3 pCi/m3 A comparison of the weekly mean values for 2006 indicate no notable differences among the three groups (Figure C-5, Appendix C).

In addition, a comparison of the 2006 air particulate data with previous years data indicate no effects from the operation of PBAPS (Figure C-4, Appendix C).

Gamma Spectromaetry Weekly samples were composited quarterly and analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-V.3, Appendix C). Naturally occurring Be-7 due to cosmic ray activity was detected in 18 of 20 samples. These values ranged from 58 to 129 E-3 pCi/m 3.

All other nuclides were less than the MDC.

b.

Airborne Iodine Continuous air samples were collected from five locations (1 B, 1Z, 1C, 3A, and 5H2) and analyzed weekly for 1-131 (Table C-Vl. 1, Appendix C). All results were less than the MDC.

2.

Terrestrial

a.

Milk Samples were collected from six locations (J, 0, R, S and T) biweekly April through November and monthly December through March. Samples from six additional locations (B, C, D, E, L, P) were taken quarterly. The following analyses were performed:

Milk samples from all locations were analyzed for concentrations of 1-131 (Tables C-VII.1, Appendix C).

All results were less than the MDC.

Gamma Spectrometry Each milk sample from locations J, 0, R, S, and T was analyzed for concentrations of gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-VI.2, Appendix C).

Naturally occurring K-40 was found in all samples and ranged from 1,040 to 1,490 pCi/I. All other nuclides were less than the MDC. Comparison of the 2006 Cs-137 milk data with previous years data indicate no effects from the operation of PBAPS (Figure C-7 (Appendix C).

b.

Fod Produrtq Food product samples were collected at three locations (1Q, 2B and 55) when available. Of these locations two, 2B and 55, could be affected by Peach Bottom's effluent releases. The following analysis was performed:

-14

Gamma Spectrometry Each food product sample from locations 1Q, 2B and 55 was analyzed for concentrations of gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-VIII.1, Appendix C).

Nuclides detected were naturally occurring Be-7, K-40, Ra-226, Ac-228, Th-228 and Th-232. Naturally occurring Be-7 and K-40 activity was found at all locations. Beryllium-7 activity was found in 40 of 42 samples and ranged from <62 to 4,020 pCi/kg wet. Potassium-40 activity was found in all samples and ranged from 2,560 to 7,740 pCi/kg wet.

Cesium-137, attributed to the soil attached to the samples, was found in two samples of lettuce at concentrations of 5.14 and 8.22 pCi/kg wet. All other nuclides were less than the MDC.

G-

'..-A ie

._3mf R-reto Ambient gamma radiation levels were measured using Panasonic 814 (CaSO4) thermoluminescent dosimeters.

Forty-seven TLD locations were established around the site.

Results of TLD measurements are listed in Tables C-IX.1 through C-IX.3 and Figure C-7, Appendix C.

Most TLD measurements were below 10 mR per standard month, with a range of 3.7 to 10.5 mR per standard month. A comparison of the Site Boundary and Intermediate Distance data to the Control locations data indicate that the ambient gamma radiation levels from the Control locations 16, 18, 19 and 24 were essentially the same as the other locations. The historical ambient gamma radiation data from the Control locations was plotted along with similar data from the Site and the Intermediate Distance locations (Figure C-7, Appendix C)

D.

Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI)

The Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) was utilized beginning June 2000. As of 2006, a total of 32 TN-68 casks, each loaded with 68 fuel bundles were in place on the ISFSI pad. As part of the overall REMP, additional TLDs were placed at locations near the site boundary and at the nearest resident. Although there was a general trend for increased dose at all REMP locations (see Figure C-7, Appendix C), Onsite location 1R, which is located on the hillside overlooking the ISFSI showed an increase trend of 1 to 2 mR per standard month when compared to controls (Figure C-8, Appendix C).

Location 2B, which represents the nearest residence showed no increase in dose rates when compared to controls.

Data from location 2B is used to demonstrate compliance to both 40CFR190 and 10CFR72.104 limits.

E.

Land Use Census A Land Use Survey conducted during the 2006 growing season around the Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (PBAPS) was performed by Normandeau Associates, Inc., NAI Environmental Services Division for Exelon Nuclear to comply with Section 3.8.E.2 of PBAPS's Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Specifications (ODCMS) and Bases. The purpose of the survey was to document the nearest milk producing animal in each of the sixteen meteorological sectors out to five miles.

In addition, the nearest residence and garden of >500 square feet were documented. The distance and direction of all locations were positioned using Global Positioning System (GPS) technology. The results of this survey are summarized below.

Distance in Miles from the PBAPS Reactor Buiidincs.

Sector Residence Garden Milk Farm Miles Miles Miles 1 N 2.4 2.8 2.8 2 NNE 2.1 2.1 2.1 3 NE 2.1 2.1 2.1 4 ENE 2.0 2.4 2.1 5 E 2.0 2.9 2.9 6 ESE 3.8 3.8 3.8 7 SE 3.7 3.7 3.7 8 SSE 0.7 0.7 9S 1.0 1.0 10 SSW 1.2 1.8 2.7 11 SW 0.9 0.9 2.3 12 WSW 0.7 0.9 13 W 1.0 1.0 1.0 14 WNW 0.6 0.8 15 NW 0.6 3.4 3.4 16 NNW 1.0 F.

Summary of Results - Inter-Laboratory Comparison Program The primary and secondary laboratories analyzed Performance Evaluation (PE) samples of air particulate, air iodine, milk, soil, food products and water matrices (Appendix E). The PE samples, supplied by Analytics Inc.,

Environmental Resource Associates (ERA) and DOE's Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP), were evaluated against the following pre-set acceptance criteria:

1.

Analytics Evaluation Criteria Analytics' evaluation report provides a ratio of laboratory results and Analytics' known value. Since flag values are not assigned by Analytics, TBE-ES evaluates the reported ratios based on internal QC requirements, which are based on the DOE MAPEP criteria.

2.

ERA Evaluation Criteria ERA's evaluation report provides an acceptance range for control and warning limits with associated flag values. ERA's acceptance limits are established per the USEPA, NELAC, state specific PT program requirements or ERA's SOP for the Generation of Performance Acceptance Limits, as applicable. The acceptance limits are either determined by a regression equation specific to each analyte or a fixed percentage limit promulgated under the

3.

DOE Evaluation Criteria MAPEP's evaluation report provides an acceptance range with associated flag values.

The MAPEP defines three levels of performance: Acceptable (flag =

"A"), Acceptable with Warning (flag = "W"), and Not Acceptable (flag = "N"). Performance is considered acceptable when a mean result for the specified analyte is +/- 20% of the reference value.

Performance is acceptable with warning when a mean result falls in the range from +/-20% to +/-30% of the reference value (i.e., 20% <

bias < 30%). If the bias is greater than 30%, the results are deemed not acceptable.

For the primary laboratory, 24 out of 28 analytes met the specified acceptance criteria. Four samples did not meet the specified acceptance criteria for the following reasons:

1. Teledyne Brown Engineering's MAPEP Series 15 January 2006 soil Cs-1 34 was evaluated as a false positive, although TBE considered the result a non-detect due to the peak not being identified by the gamma software.

MAPEP suggests the Bi-214 is not being differentiated from the Cs-134 peak. When the ratio of activity to uncertainty exceeds 3, TBE will use a key line analysis rather than a weighted mean analysis when evaluating MAPEP non-detects.

2. Teledyne Brown Engineering's MAPEP Series 15 January 2006 Sr-90 in vegetation result of 2.22 Bq/kg exceeded the upper acceptance range of 2.029 Bq/kg. The samples were analyzed in triplicate and the results averaged. One high result of 2.43 Bq/kg biased the submitted results on the high side. TBE was unable to determine the cause for the higher result. The Sr-90 in vegetation results for MAPEP Series 14 and MAPEP Series 16 were acceptable. No client samples were analyzed during the MAPEP Series 14 time period.
3.

Teledyne Brown Engineering's MAPEP Series 15 January 2006 Pu-238 and Pu-239/240 in vegetation result of 2.22 Bq/kg failed the required acceptance ranges. TBE was evaluating the current preparation method for vegetation samples, which proved insufficient for the analyses. TBE does not perform isotopic Pu on client's vegetation samples.

For the secondary laboratory, 20 out of 25 analytes met the specified acceptance criteria. Seven samples did not meet the specified acceptance criteria for the following reasons:

1.

Environmental Inc.'s ERA November 2006 water 1-131 result of 28.4 pCi/L exceeded the upper control limit of 27.3 pCi/L. The reported result was an average of three analyses, results ranged from 25.36 pCi/L to 29.23 pCi/L. A fourth analysis was performed, with a result of 24.89 pCi/L.

2.

Environmental Inc.'s MAPEP January 2006 vegetation Pu-238 result of 0.08 Bq/sample exceeded the lower control limit of 0.10 Bq/sample due to incomplete dissolution of the sample.

3.

Environmental Inc.'s MAPEP January 2006 air particulate Pu-238 result of 0.03 Bq/sample exceeded the lower control limit of 0.05 Bq/sample due to incomplete dissolution of the sample.

4.

Environmental Inc.'s MAPEP January 2006 soil Pu-238, Pu-239/240, U-233/234 and U-238 results of 14.6, 14.6, 13.5 and 15.4 Bq/kg, respectively, exceeded the lower control limits of 42.81, 32.09, 25.9 and 27.2 Bq/kg, respectively, due to incomplete dissolution of the sample.

The Inter-Laboratory Comparison Program provides evidence of "in control" counting systems and methods, and that the laboratories are producing accurate and reliable data.

18-

V.

References

1.

Preoperational Environs Radioactivity Survey Summary Report, March 1960 through January 1966. (September 1967).

2.

Interex Corporation, Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Regional Environs Radiation Monitoring Program Preoperational Summary Report, Units 2 and 3, 5 February 1966 through 8 August 1973, June 1977,

Natick, Massachusetts.
3.

Radiation Management Corporation Publication, Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Preoperational Radiological Monitoring Report for Unit 2 and 3, January 1974, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

7

~

~

4 444 Intentionally left blank

APPENDIX A RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT

SUMMARY

TABLE A - 1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STAT4ON, 2006 Name of Facility:

PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION DOCKET NUMBER:

50-277 & 50-278 Location of Facility: YORK COUNTY, PA REPORTING PERIOD:

2006 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN MEAN MEAN STATIONS #

NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES LOWER LIMIT (F)

(F)

(F)

NAME NONROUTIME (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT)

(LLD)

MEASUREMENTS SURFACE WATER (PCI/LITER)

H-3 8

200 167 (0/4)

(<157/<172) 168 (0/4)

(<156/<174)

GAMMA MN-54 24 15 3

(0/12)

(<1/<6) 15 3

(0/12)

(<1/<6) 3 (0/12)

(<11<5) 3 (0/12)

(<1/<5)

J168 (0!5/<474 (0442)

(<11<6)

(0/12)

(I/<6)

CO-58 FE-59 30 7

6 71, (0/12)

(0/12)

(0/i12)

(<2/<14)

(<2/<11)

(2/<14)

CO-60 15 3

3 (0/12)

(0/12)

(0*/'12)

(<1/<8)

(<1/<6)

(ý1/<8)

ZN-65 30 6

6 6-`.

(0/12)

(0/12)

(0412)

(<2/<15)

(<1/<12)

(<2/<15)

NB-95 15 3

3 (0/12)

(0/12)

(0412)

(<1/<7)

(<1/<6) 1( /<7)

ZR-95 30 5

5 (0/12)

(0/12)

(0412)

(<2/<12)

(<1/<10)

!(<72/<12)

THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDAs AND THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

ILL CONTROL PEACH BOTTOM UNITS 2 AND 3 INTAKE 0.24 MILES NE OF SITE IMM INDICATOR PEACH BOTTOM CANAL DISCHARGE 1.04 MILES SE OF SITE 1MM INDICATOR PEACH BOTTOM CANAL DISCHARGE 1.04 MILES SE OF SITE 1MM INDICATOR PEACH BOTTOM CANAL DISCHARGE 1.04 MILES SE OF SITE 1MM INDICATOR PEACH BOTTOM CANAL DISCHARGE 1.04 MILES SE OF SITE 1MM INDICATOR PEACH BOTTOM CANAL DISCHARGE 1.04 MILES SE OF SITE 1MM INDICATOR PEACH BOTTOM CANAL DISCHARGE 1.04 MILES SE OF SITE 1MM INDICATOR PEACH BOTTOM CANAL DISCHARGE 1.04 MILES SE OF SITE 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

TABLE A - 1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, 2006 Name of Facility:

PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION DOCKET NUMBER:

50-277 & 50-278 Location of Facility: YORK COUNTY, PA REPORTING PERIOD:

2006 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN MEAN MEAN STATIONS #

NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES LOWER LIMIT (F)

(F)

(F)

NAME NONROUTIME (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT)

(LLD)

MEASUREMENTS SURFACE WATER (PCI/LITER) 1-131 CS-134 CS-137 BA-140 LA-140 15 11 (0/12)

(<3/<14) 15 3

(0/12)

(<1/<7) 18 3

(0/12)

(<1/<6) 60 22 (0/12)

(<7/<33) 15 8

(0/12)

(<2/<12) 4 2.7 (8/12)

(< 1.9/3.7) 200 166 (0/4)

(<152/<173) 11 (0/12)

(<2/<15) 3 (0/12)

(<1/<6) 3 (0/12)

(<1/<6) 22 (0/12)

(<5/<33) 7 (0/12)

(<2/< 11) 2.7 (10/12)

(< 1.9/4.0) 166 (0/4)

(<158/<173)

(0,/12)

ý(ý3/<14) 3'3 i(0/,12)

(<1/<7)

-3t (0/12)

(<i1/<6)

ý22 (0/12)

(<7/<33)

.(0/12)

(8z12)

<1.9/ 3.7) 166 (0/4)

(ý<152/<173)

(O.012)
(*1/<6) 1MM INDICATOR PEACH BOTTOM CANAL DISCHARGE 1.04 MILES SE OF SITE 1MM INDICATOR PEACH BOTTOM CANAL DISCHARGE 1.04 MILES SE OF SITE 1MM INDICATOR PEACH BOTTOM CANAL DISCHARGE 1.04 MILES SE OF SITE 1MM INDICATOR PEACH BOTTOM CANAL DISCHARGE 1.04 MILES SE OF SITE 1MM INDICATOR PEACH BOTTOM CANAL DISCHARGE 1.04 MILES SE OF SITE 4L INDICATOR CONOWINGO DAM EL 33' MSL 8.66 MILES SE OF SITE 4L INDICATOR CONOWINGO DAM EL 33' MSL 8.66 MILES SE OF SITE 0

0 0

DRINKING WATER (PCI/LITER)

GR-B 24 8

0 0

0 H-3 GAMMA MN-54 24 15 3

(0/12)

(<1/<6) 3 (0/12)

(<1/<6) 61 CONTROL HOLTWOOD DAM HYDROELECTRIC STATION 5.75 MILES NW OF SITE THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDAs AND THE POSITIV!EVALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F),

Name of Facility:

Location of Facility MEDIUM OR PATHWAY SAMPLED (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT)

DRINKING WATER (PCI/LITER)

.4q TABLE A - 1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, 2006 PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION DOCKET NUMBER:

50-277 & 50-278 YORK COUNTY, PA REPORTING PERIOD:

2006 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS LOCATION

ý'u TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN MEAN IMEAN STATIONS #

ANALYSES ANALYSES LOWER LIMIT (F)

(F)

(,F)

NAME PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (LLD) m'g NUMBER OF NONROUTIME REPORTED MEASUREMENTS CO-58 15 3

(0/12)

(<1/<6) 30 7

(0/12)

(<2/<13) 3 (0/12)

(<1/<6) 7 (0/12)

(<2/<13)

(0/12)

](*2/<131 4L INDICATOR CONOWINGO DAM EL 33' MSL 8.66 MILES SE OF SITE 4L INDICATOR CONOWINGO DAM EL 33' MSL 8.66 MILES SE OF SITE 0

0 FE-59 CO-60 15 3

3 (0/12)

(0/12)

J(0,/12)

(<l/<6)

(<1/<6)

Jý,. 1/<6)

ZN-65 30 7

7 7,

(0/12)

(0/12)

(0/12)

(<l/<16)

(<2/<14)

<I1/<16)

NB-95 15 3

3 9`I (0/12)

(0/12)

(0/12)

(<1/<7)

(<1/<6)

  • !(<!/<7)

ZR-95 30 6

6 PO, (0/12)

(0/12)

(0/12)

(<1/<12)

(<2/< 11)

,(<2/< 11) 1-131 15 11 11 11 (0/12)

(0/11)

.1(0/12)

(<3/<15)

(<4/<14) "

Q'<3/<15)

CS-134 15 3

3 (0/12)

(0/12) o(0/12)

(<1/<8)

(<1/<7)

(<1/<8)

THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDAs AND THE POSITIVEIVALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F) !F I,

61 CONTROL 0

HOLTWOOD DAM HYDROELECTRIC STATION 5.75 MILES NW OF SITE 4L INDICATOR CONOWINGO DAM EL 33' MSL 8.66 MILES SE OF SITE 4L INDICATOR CONOWINGO DAM EL 33' MSL 8.66 MILES SE OF SITE 0

0 61 CONTROL 0

HOLTWOOD DAM HYDROELECTRIC STATION 5.75 MILES NW OF SITE 4L INDICATOR CONOWINGO DAM EL 33' MSL 8.66 MILES SE OF SITE 4L INDICATOR CONOWINGO DAM EL 33' MSL 8.66 MILES SE OF SITE 0

0

TABLE A - 1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, 2006 il!

Name of Facility:

PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION DOCKET NUMBER:

50-277 & 50-278 Location of Facility: YORK COUNTY, PA REPORTING PERIOD:

2006 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN MEAN MEAN STATIONS #

NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES LOWER LIMIT (F)

(F)

NAME NONROUTIME (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT)

(LLD)

MEASUREMENTS DRINKING WATER (PCI/LITER)

BOTTOM FEEDER (FISH)

(PCI/KG WET)

CS-137 BA-140 LA-140 GAMMA K-40 4

18 3

(0/12)

(<1/<7) 60 21 (0/12)

(<7/<34) 15 7

(0/12)

(<2/<1 1)

N/A 3195 (2/2)

(3130/3260) 130 53 (0/2)

(<43/<63) 130 59 (0/2)

(<54/<65) 260 164 (0/2)

(<160/<167) 3 (0/12)

(<1/<6) 22 (0/12)

(<8/<35) 7 (0/12)

(<3/<11) 3020 (2/2)

(2810/3230) 58 (0/2)

(<40/<77) 59 (0/2)

(<39/<78) 162 (0/2)

(<133/<191)

(0/12)

(

<116) j2, (0/12)

(<8 /<35)

ý(0/12) 3195 7(2/2)

  • (3,130/3260)

"58

,(0/2)

"*(.40/<77)

  • 59'

"(0

,/2)

(<54/<65) 164 (0/2)

,(ý160/<167) 61 CONTROL 0

HOLTWOOD DAM HYDROELECTRIC STATION 5.75 MILES NW OF SITE 61 CONTROL 0

HOLTWOOD DAM HYDROELECTRIC STATION 5.75 MILES NW OF SITE MN-54 CO-58 FE-59 4L INDICATOR CONOWINGO DAM EL 33' MSL 8.66 MILES SE OF SITE 4 INDICATOR CONOWINGO POND LOCATED IN CONOWINGO 6 CONTROL HOLTWOOD POND LOCATED IN HOLTWOOD POND 4 INDICATOR CONOWINGO POND LOCATED IN CONOWINGO 4 INDICATOR CONOWINGO POND LOCATED IN CONOWINGO 6 CONTROL HOLTWOOD POND LOCATED IN HOLTWOOD POND 0

0 0

0 0

CO-60 130 58 59 59 (0/2)

(0/2)

,,(0/2)

(<43/<73)

(<47/<71)

J'(47/<71)

THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDAs AND THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F).'

TABLE A - 1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, 2006 Name of Facility:

PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION DOCKET NUMBER:

50-277 & 50-278 Location of Facility: YORK COUNTY, PA REPORTING PERIOD:

2006 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS LOCATION "r

MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN MEAN

-MEAN STATIONS #

NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES LOWER LIMIT (F)

(F)

(F)

NAME NONROUTIME (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCEAND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT)

(LLD)

MEASUREMENTS BOTTOM FEEDER (FISH)

(PCI/KG WET)

ZN-65 CS-134 CS-137 260 139 (0/2)

(<92/<185) 130 64 (0/2)

(<51/<76) 150 62 (0/2)

(<51/<73) 141 (0/2)

(<97/<186) 60 (0/2)

(<32/<88) 54 (0/2)

(<39/<70) 141

,(0/2)

ý(<97/<186) 6,14

,(0/2)

(<51/<76)

!62.

(0/2)

(*51/<73)

PREDATOR (FISH)

GAMMA 4

(PCI /KG WET)

K-40 N/A 3550 3510 3 550 (2/2)

(2/2)

ý(2/2)

(3240/3860)

(3040/3980)

(3240/3860)

MN-54 130 59 64 64 (0/2)

(0/2)

(0/2)

(<42/<75)

(<63/<64)

(<63/<64)

CO-58 130 72 68 72 (0/2)

(0/2)

(0/2)

(<66/<78)

(<61/<76)

(<66/<78)

FE-59 260 142 172 172 (0/2)

(0/2)

(0/2)

(<141/<143)

(<149/<195)

(<149/<195)

CO-60 130 68 75 75 (0/2)

(0/2)

(0/2)

(<57/<79)

(<65/<86)

(<.ý65/<86)

THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDAs AND THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F) 6 CONTROL HOLTWOOD POND LOCATED IN HOLTWOOD POND 4 INDICATOR CONOWINGO POND LOCATED IN CONOWINGO 4 INDICATOR CONOWINGO POND LOCATED IN CONOWINGO 4 INDICATOR CONOWINGO POND LOCATED IN CONOWINGO 6 CONTROL HOLTWOOD POND LOCATED IN HOLTWOOD POND 4 INDICATOR CONOWINGO POND LOCATED IN CONOWINGO 6 CONTROL HOLTWOOD POND LOCATED IN HOLTWOOD POND 6 CONTROL HOLTWOOD POND LOCATED IN HOLTWOOD POND 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0

TABLE A - 1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, 2006 Name of Facility:

PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION DOCKET NUMBER:

50-277 & 50-278 Location of Facility: YORK COUNTY, PA REPORTING PERIOD:

2006 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS LOCATION

tI MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN MEAN MEAN STATIONS #

NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES LOWER LIMIT (F)

(F)

(F)i NAME NONROUTIME (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT)

(LLD)

T MEASUREMENTS PREDATOR (FISH)

(PCI/KG WET)

ZN-65 CS-134 CS-137 SEDIMENT (PCI/KG DRY)

GAMMA BE-7 6

260 142 (0/2)

(<125/<158) 130 59 (0/2)

(<43/<76) 150 69 (0/2)

(<54/<84)

N/A 770 (0/4)

(<494/<975)

N/A 18475 (4/4)

(14400/26000)

N/A 87 (0/4)

(<45/<122)

N/A 88 (0/4)

(<52/< 127)

N/A 96 (0/4)

(<58/< 132) 164 (0/2)

(<127/<200) 59 (0/2)

(<51/<66) 57 (0/2)

(<47/<68) 846 (0/2)

(<747/<945) 9645 (2/2)

(9430/9860) 86 (0/2)

(<80/<92) 82 (0/2)

(<56/<107)

(0/2)

(ý127/<200) 59; (0/2)

(ý43/<76) 6691 (0/2)

(<54/<84)

(0/2)

(-<897/<975)

, 22500

-(2/2)

'(.19000/26000) 1414

-(0/2)

'(<o100/<122)

.,15 (0/2)

(ý96<

132)

(<ý98/< 132) 6 CONTROL HOLTWOOD POND LOCATED IN HOLTWOOD POND 4 INDICATOR CONOWINGO POND LOCATED IN CONOWINGO 4 INDICATOR CONOWINGO POND LOCATED IN CONOWINGO 0

0 0

K-40 MN-54 CO-58 CO-60 4T INDICATOR 0

CONOWINGO POND NEAR CONOWINGO DAM 7.92 MILES SE OF SITE 4T INDICATOR 0

CONOWINGO POND NEAR CONOWINGO DAM 7.92 MILES SE OF SITE 4T INDICATOR 0

CONOWINGO POND NEAR CONOWINGO DAM 7.92 MILES SE OF SITE 4T INDICATOR 0

CONOWINGO POND NEAR CONOWINGO DAM 7.92 MILES SE OF SITE 4T INDICATOR 0

CONOWINGO POND NEAR CONOWINGO DAM 7.92 MILES SE OF SITE 70 (0/2)

(-:58/<82)

THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDAs AND THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A - 1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, 2006 Name of Facility:

PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION DOCKET NUMBER:

50-277 & 50-278 Location of Facility: YORK COUNTY, PA REPORTING PERIOD:

2006 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN MEAN MEAN STATIONS #

NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES LOWER LIMIT (F)

(F)

(0)!

NAME NONROUTIME (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT)

(LLD)

MEASUREMENTS SEDIMENT (PCI/KG DRY)

EXTENDED SEDIMENT (PCI/KG DRY)

CS-134 CS-137 GAMMA BE-7 15 K-40 MN-54 CO-58 CO-60 CS-134 150 95 (0/4)

(<45/<130) 180 122 (2/4)

(<68/217)

N/A 900 (2/15)

(<494/<975)

N/A 14833 (15/15)

(22800/7300)

N/A 86 (0/15)

(<46/<136)

N/A 93 (0/15)

(<56/<152)

N/A 128 (4/15)

(59/428) 150 144 (0/15)

(<55/<144)

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 99 (0/2)

(<60/<138) 89 (1/2)

(70/<107) 118 (0/2)

(o105/<130)

(2/2)

(1i18/217) 1-780

'(1780)

,22800 28°°)

(22800) 1,36

(<136) 152 428

('1o/1)

(ý428)

.*(144) 9000 FEET 0

4T INDICATOR 0

CONOWINGO POND NEAR CONOWINGO DAM 7.92 MILES SE OF SITE 4T INDICATOR 0

CONOWINGO POND NEAR CONOWINGO DAM 7.92 MILES SE OF SITE 12000 FEET 6000 FEET BR 0

0 2500 BR 0

6000 BR 2000 BR 0

0 THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDAs AND THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A - 1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, 2006 LI Name of Facility:

PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION DOCKET NUMBER:

50-277 & 50-278 Location of Facility: YORK COUNTY, PA REPORTING PERIOD:

2006 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN MEAN MEAN STATIONS #

NUMBER OF H71:

PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES LOWER LIMIT (F)

(F)

(F)

NAME NONROUTIME (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RNGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT)

(LLD)

MEASUREMENTS EXTENDED SEDIMENT (PCI/KG DRY)

AIR PARTICULATE (E-3 PCI/CU.METER)

CS-137 GR-B 260 180 117 (7/15)

(<56/197) 10 17 (255/260)

(<7/34)

N/A 81.1 (18/20)

(58/<129)

N/A N/A 197 (197)

(52/52)

ý91 8 65(3/<4)

  • (65/<129) 15000 FEET 0

GAMMA BE-7 20 N/A MN-54 N/A 2.9 N/A 3.1 (0/20) i(0/4)

(< 1.8/< 4.7)

.1(<!2.2/< 4.7)

CO-58 N/A 4.3 N/A

4. 5 (0/20)

-(/4)

(< 2.I/< 7.8)

(<3.3/< 7.8)

CO-60 N/A 2.8 N/A 3 A (0/20)

(q/4)

(< 1.0/< 6.0)

(< 1.0/< 6.0)

CS-134 50 2.7 N/A 29 (0/20)

"(0/4)

(< 1.5/< 4.9)

.(< 1.5/< 4.9)

AIR PARTICULATE CS-137 60 2.7 N/A 3i0 (E-3 PCUCU.METER)

(0/20)

(0/4)

(< 1.8/< 4.5) i*!:1(--*2.5/< 4.2)

THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDAs AND THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

I Z INDICATOR WEATHER STATION # 1 0.26 MILES SE OF SITE 51-12 INDICATOR MANOR SUBSTATION 30.79 MILES NE OF SITE 3A INDICATOR DELTA PA SUBSTATION 3.62 MILES SW OF SITE 5H2 INDICATOR MANOR SUBSTATION 30.79 MILES NE OF SITE IC INDICATOR PEACH BOTTOM SOUTH SUB STATION 0.85 MILES SSE OF SITE 5H2 INDICATOR MANOR SUBSTATION 30.79 MILES NE OF SITE 5H2 INDICATOR MANOR SUBSTATION 30.79 MILES NE OF SITE

TABLE A - 1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, 2006 Name of Facility:

PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION DOCKET NUMBE"R:

50-277 & 50-278 Location of Facility: YORK COUNTY, PA REPORTING PERIOD:

2006 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN MEAN MEAN STATIONS #

NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES LOWER LIMIT (F)

(F)

(F)

NAME NONROUTIME (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT)

(LLD)

MEASUREMENTS AIR IODINE (E-3 PCI/CU.METER)

GAMMA 1-131 260 70 41 (0/260)

(<7/<69)

N/A 4'61, (0/52)

(<19/<69) 1C INDICATOR PEACH BOTTOM SOUTH SUB STATION 0.85 MILES SSE OF SITE 0

MILI (PCI/

K 1-131 129 1

0.6 0.6 07

/LITER)

(0/96)

(0/33)

(0/4)

(< 0.2/< 2,0)

(< 0.2/< 1.5)

(*J0.5/< 0.9)

GAMMA 105 K-40 N/A 1294 1287 1349 (84/84)

(21/21)

(2,1/21)

(1040/1490)

(1210/1430)

(1200/1490)

CS-134 15 7

7 (0/84)

(0/2 1)

'(6/2 1)

(<2/<13)

(<2/<13)

-(<'2/<13)

CS-137 18

.7 7

(0/84)

(0/21) j(0/21) 4'j,

(<2/< 13)

(<2/<13)

2/<13)

BA-140 60 37 37 38 (0/84)

(0/21)

.(0/2 1)

(<16/<56)

(<17/<50)

(<16/<56)

K LA-140 15 11 11 I1

/LITER)

(0/84)

(0/21)

(0/21)

(<5/<15)

(<5/<15)

(<5/< 15)

THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDAs AND THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F) w,71 D INDICATOR 0

3.51 MILES NE OF SITE R INDICATOR 0

0.89 MILES WSW OF SITE R INDICATOR 0

0.89 MILES WSW OF SITE R INDICATOR 0

0.89 MILES WSW OF SITE J INDICATOR 0

0.97 MILES W OF SITE MIL (PCI T CONTROL 0

5.7 MILES W OF SITE

TABLE A - 1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, 2006 Name of Facility:

PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION DOCKET NUMBER:

50-277 & 50-278 Location of Facility: YORK COUNTY, PA REPORTING PERIOD:

2006 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS LOCATION

i MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN MEAN MEAN STATIONS #

NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES LOWER LIMIT (F)

(F)

F),

NAME NONROUTIME (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT)

(LLD)

MEASUREMENTS FOOD PRODUCTS (PCI/KG WET)

GAMMA BE-7 42 MN-54 CO-58 CO-60 1-131 CS-134 CS-137 N/A 687 (27/28)

(<62/4020)

N/A 9

(0/28)

(<1/<26)

N/A 10 (0/28)

(<2/<32)

N/A 9

(0/28)

(<1/<25) 60 55 (0/27)

(<11/<133) 60 9

(0/28)

(<1/<32) 80 9

(2/28)

(<1/<24)

N/A 7

(172/172)

(4/11) 486 (13/14)

(89/2070) 9 (0/14)

(<2/<21) 10 (0/14)

(<3/<24) 9 (0/14)

(<2/<25) 49 (0/14)

(<26/<65) 9 (0/14)

(<2/<23) 9 (0/14)

(<2/<22) 7 (16/16)

(5/8) 737ý (14/14)

(156/2310)

It 10l (o/i!14)

(<1}/<21)

(0/14)

(;2/<24)

(0014)

(<1/<2 1) 57 (0/13)

(<15/<131)

i' (0/1l4)

(<1/<22)

.(li/14)

S1/<20) 8 o

(8/10)

IQ INDICATOR NW SECTOR IQ INDICATOR NW SECTOR 1Q INDICATOR NW SECTOR IQ INDICATOR NW SECTOR IQ INDICATOR NW SECTOR IQ INDICATOR NW SECTOR 0

0 0

0 0

IQ INDICATOR NW SECTOR IR INDICATOR TRANSMISSION LINE HILL 0.53 MILES SSE DIRECT RADIATION (MILLI-ROENTGEN/STD.MO.)

TLD-QUARTERLY 188 THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDAs AND THE POSITIVEVALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

APPENDIX B SAMPLE DESIGNATION AND LOCATIONS

TABLE B-1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Sampling Locations, Distance and Direction from Reactor Buildings, Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 2006 Location Location Description Distance & Direction from PBAPS Vents A

Surface Water ILL 1MM Peach Bottom Units 2 and 3 Intake - Composite (Control)

Peach Bottom Canal Discharge -Composite 0.24 miles NE 1.04 miles SE 8.66 miles SE 5.75 miles NW B

Drinking (Potable) Water 4L 61 Conowingo Dam EL 33' MSL - Composite Holtwood Dam Hydroelectric Station - Composite (Control) r, Fish 4

Conowingo Pond Located in Conowingo Pond below the discharge

-.6 otwood-Pond (Control)

Located in H

_twood Pond IF)Sedimen+/-

4J 4T 6F Conowingo Pond near Berkin's Run Conowingo Pond near Conowingo Dam Holtwood Dam (Control)

F Air Partintulate - Air Iodine 1B 1z 1A 1C 3A 5H2 Weather Station #2 Weather Station #1 Weather Station #1 Peach Bottom South Sub Station Delta, PA-Substation Manor Substation F

Milk -

hi-weekly / monthly J0 R

S T

1.39 miles SE 7.92 miles SE 5.96 miles NW 0.49 miles NW 0.26 miles SE 0.26 miles SE 0.85 miles SSE 3.62 miles SW 30.79 miles NE 0,97 miles W 2.32 miles SW 0.89 miles WSW 3.61 miles SE 6.55 miles W 10.58 miles S 9.54 miles NW 3.51 miles NE 8.74 miles N 2.12 miles NE 2.08 miles ENE 0.79 miles NW 0.73 miles SSE 9.9 miles NE (Control)

G_

Mlk-quarterly B

C D

E L

P (Control)

(Control)

(Control)

H Food Products - monthly when available 1Q 2B 55 (Control)

B-I

TABLE B-1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Sampling Locations, Distance and Direction from Reactor Buildings, Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 2006 Location Location Description Distance & Direction from PBAPS Vents I

Environmental Doaimetry-TL sotp Roundary 1L 1 P 1A 1Q 1D 2

1M 1R 11 1C 1J 1K 40 1NN 1H IG 1B 1E Peach Bottom Unit 3 Intake Tower B & C Fence Weather Station #1 Tower D & E Fence 140 0 Sector Peach Bottom 1300 Sector Hill Discharge Transmission Line Hill Peach Bottom South Substation Peach Bottom South Substation Peach Bottom 1800 Sector Hill Peach Bottom Site Area H PbhýBbttorh;20OSco 0

Peah Boo S4e Area Peach Bottom Site Peach Bottom 2700 Sector Hill Peach Bottom North Substation Weather Station #2 Peach Bottom 350' Sector Hill 0.24 miles NE 0.40 miles ESE 0.26 miles SE 0.62 miles SE 0.67 miles SE 0.88 miles SE 1.03 miles SE 0.53 miles SSE 0.54 miles SSE 0.85 miles SSE 0.71 miles S 0.87 miles SW

.m0Id§mesSSW 0.48 miles WSW 0.59 miles W 0.60 miles WNW 0.49 miles NW 0.59 miles NNW Intermrdiate Distance 2B 5

15 22 44 32 45 14 17 31A 4K 23 27 48 3A 49 50 51 26 6B 42 43 46 47 Burk Property Wakefield, PA Silver Spring Rd Eagle Road Goshen Mill Rd Slate Hill Rd PB-Keeney Line Peters Creek Riverview Rd Eckman Rd Conowingo Dam Power House Roof Peach Bottom 1500 Sector Hill N. Cooper Road Macton Substation Delta, PA Substation PB-Conastone Line TRANSCO Pumping Station Fin Substation Slab Road Holtwood Dam Power House Roof Muddy Run Environ. Laboratory Drumore Township School Broad Creek Broad Creek Scout Camp Nottingham, PA Substation (Control)

Harrisville, MD Substation (Control) 0.71 miles SSE 4.64 miles E 3.68 miles N 2.39 miles NNE 5.07 miles NE 2.75 miles ENE 3.38 miles ENE 1.97 miles E 4.07 miles ESE 4.57 miles SE 8.61 miles SE 1.01 miles SSE 2.68 miles S 4.99 miles SSW 3.62 miles SW 4.05 miles WSW 4.99 miles W 3.98 miles WNW 4.23 miles NW 5.78 miles NW 4.13 miles NNW 5.00 miles NNE 4.48 miles SSE 4.26 miles S 12.72 miles E 10.91 miles ESE Control 16 24 B-2

TABLE B-1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Sampling Locations, Distance and Direction from Reactor Buildings, Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 2006 Location Location Description Distance & Direction from PBAPS Vents 18 19 Fawn Grove, PA (Control)

Red Lion, PA (Control) 9.86 miles W 20.21 miles WNW

.~-

B-3

TABLE B-2 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Summary of Sample Collection and Analytical Methods, Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 2006 Sample Analysis Sampling Method Collection Procedure Number iSample Size Analytical Procedure Number Medium 1,,l Surface Water Gamma Monthly composite NAI-ER15 Collection of water samples for 2igallon TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotope Spectroscopy from a continuous radiological analysis (Peach Bottom analysis water compositor.

Atomic Power Station)

-Env.

Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters

_by gamma spectroscopy Surface Water Tritium Quarterly composite NAI-ER15 Collection of water samples for 500 ml TBE, TBE-2010 Tritium and carbon-14 analysis by from a continuous radiological analysis (Peach Bottom liquid scintillation water compositor.

Atomic Power Station)

Env. Inc., T-02 Determination of tritium in water (direct method)

Drinking Water Gross Beta Monthly composite NAI-ER15 Collection of water samples for 2'gallon TBE, TBE-2008 Gross alpha and/or gross beta from a continuous radiological analysis (Peach Bottom activity in various matrices water compositor.

Atomic Power Station)

Env. Inc., W(DS)-O1 Determination of gross alpha and/or gross beta in water (dissolved solids or total residue)

Drinking Water Gamma Monthly composite NAI-ER15 Collection of water samples for 2!ýgallon TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotope Spectroscopy from a continuous radiological analysis (Peach Bottom analysis water compositor.

Atomic Power Station)

.:A Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters P.by gamma spectroscopy Drinking Water Tritium Quarterly composite NAI-ER15 Collection of water samples for 500 ml TBE, TBE-2010 Tritium and carbon-14 analysis by from a continuous radiological analysis (Peach Bottom liquid scintillation water compositor.

Atomic Power Station)

Env. Inc., T-02 Determination of tritium in water (direct method)

Fish Gamma Semi-annual samples NAI-ER3 Collection of fish samples for

1000 grams (wet)

TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotope Spectroscopy collected via radiological analysis (Peach Bottom analysis electroshocking or Atomic Power Station) other techniques Sediment Gamma Semi-annual grab NAI-ER2 Collection of sediment samples 500 grams (dry)

TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotope Spectroscopy samples for radiological analysis (Peach Bottom analysis Atomic Power Station)

Air Particulates Gross Beta One-week composite NAI-ER16 Collection of air particulate and 1 filter TBE, TBE-2008 Gross alpha and/or gross beta of continuous air air iodine samples for radiological analysis

.(approximately 280 activity in various matrices sampling through (Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station) cubic meters glass fiber filter paper weekly)

Env. Inc., AP-02 Determination of gross alpha and/or

-_-g

,ross beta in air oarticulate filters

TABLE B-2 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Summary of Sample Colliction and Analytical Methods, Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 2006 Sample Analysis Sampling Method Collection Procedure Number iTSample Size Analytical Procedure Number Medium Air Particulates Gamma Spectroscopy Quarterly composite TBE, TBE-2023 Compositing of samples 3 filters TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotope of each station

  • (approximately 3600 analysis Env. Inc., AP-03 Procedure for compositing cuibc meters):,

air particulate filters for gammaEnv.

Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters spectroscopic analysis by gamma spectroscopy Air Iodine Gamma Spectroscopy One-week composite NAI-ER8 Collection of air particulate and

,iifter TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotope of continuous air air iodine samples for radiological analysis

,(approximately 280 analysis sampling through (Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station)

',cubic meters charcoal filter

.weekly)

Env. Inc., 1-131-02 Determination of 1-131 in charcoal

  • ________canisters by,amma spectroscopy (batch method)

Milk 1-131 Bi-weekly grab NAI-ER10 Collection of milk samples for 2 gallon TBE, TBE-2012 Radioiodine in various matrices sample when cows radiological analysis (Peach Bottom

`gllo are on pasture.

Atomic Power Station)

Env. Inc., 1-131-01 Determination of 1-131 in milk by Monthly all other anion exchange times Milk Gamma Spectroscopy Bi-weekly grab NAI-ER10 Collection of milk samples for

'2 gallon TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotope sample when cows radiological analysis (Peach Bottom analysis are on pasture.

Atomic Power Station)

Monthly all other Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters times by qamma spectroscopy Food Products Gamma Spectroscopy Monthly when NAI-ER12 Collection of vegetation 1000 grams TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotope analysis available samples for radiological analysis (Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station)

Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by

,amma soectroscopy TLD Thermoluminescence Quarterly TLDs NAI-ER9 Collection of TLD samples for

,2 dosimeters Global Dosimetry Dosimetry comprised of two radiological analysis (Peach Bottom Panasonic 814 Atomic Power Station)

(containing 3 each CaSO4 elements)

Apl

it Figure B-I Environmental Sampling Locations Between Within One Mile of the Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 2006 B]-6

- A-AT**

  • , * *,,4**
  • a 0

-5 W /

-14 60 yt/z,7r.J

/

  • T N'---

Q/T

.17,1t k'

49 0.

A

~

3 W

'W

\\

\\

SSW 'Ko jj

'N7

/..-...

)N Figure B-2 Environmental Sampling Locations Between One and Approximately Five Miles of the Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 2006 B-7

Figure B-3 Environmental Sampling Locations GreaterThan Five Miles from the Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 2006

APPENDIX C DATA TABLES AND FIGURES PRIMARY LABORATORY

TABLE C-I.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, 2006 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION pFP:IOfl 1LL 1MM PERIOD JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC MEAN

< 174

< 168

< 172

< 156 168 +/- 16

< 172

< 169

< 171

< 157 167 +/- 14 c -

1

TABLE C-I.2 STC COLLECTION PERIOD 1LL JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC MEAN CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, 2006 U

1MM JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC MEAN RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA 14 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr9-5 ;

1-131

<5

<5

<11

< 6

< 12

< 5

< 10

< 12

<4

<4

< 8

<4

<8

<4

<7

< 10

< 2

<2

< 5

< 2

<5

<2

<4

< 7

<4

<4

<10

<4

<9

<5

<8

<13

<3

<3

<8

<3

<6

<3

<6

<13

<4

< 5

< 10

< 5

< 11

< 5

<9

< 14

<1

<1

<2

<1

<1

<1

<1

<9

<1

<1

<3

<1

<2

<2

<2

<15

< 1

< 1

< 2

< 1

< 1

< 1

<1 I

<2

<1

<1

<2

<1

<1

<1

<2

<13

<4

<4

<10

<4

<9

<6

<7 i

<15

<3

<3

<7

<3

<7

<4

<6

<6 3 +/- 3 3 +/- 3 6 +/- 7 3

3 6

8 3

4 5+

6 11

+/- 8

< 6

< 6

< 14

< 8

< 15

< 7

< 12

< 14

<3

<3

<7

<3

<7

<3

<6

<9

<2

<2

<5

<2

<5

<2

<4

<6

<4

<4

< 10

< 5

< 9

< 5

< 8

< 14

<3

< 3

< 7

< 3

< 6

< 3

< 5

< 13

<4

<4

<10

<4

<9

<5

<9

<14

  • <1

<1I

< 2

< 1

< 2

< 1

< 2

< 13

<1

<2

<4

<1

<3

<2

<3 b

<14

< 1

< 1

< 2

< 1

< 2

<1I

< 2

<3

  • I

< 1

< 2

< 1

< 2

< 1

< 2

I

< 14

<3

<4

<7

< 3

< 8

<4

<6

< 14

< 5

< 4

< 10

< 5

< 10

<4

<8

< 9 3 -

4 3 -

3 7 + 8 3 -

4 6 -

8 3 -

4 5

+ 61 11 7

<6

<4

<2

<4

<3

<5

<1

<1

<1

<1

<4

<3

<6

<4

<2

<5

<3

<5

<1

<1

<1

<1

<4

<3

< 31

< 23

< 14

< 29

< 33

< 31

< 11

< 21

<5

< 15

< 32

< 15

<9

<8

<5

< 10

< 11

< 11

<4

<6

<2

<5

< 11

<5 3-+/-4 3-+/-4 22+/-19 7+/-6 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140

<7

<4

<2

<5

<3

<5

<1

<1

<1

<1

<3

<4

<6

<3

<2

<4

<3

<5

<1

<1

<1

<1

<4

<5

< 33

< 21

< 13

< 31

< 30

< 32

< 16

< 19

<7

< 16

< 24

< 23

< 12

<7

<5

< 11

< 10

< 11

<5

<8

<2

<5

<6

<7 3-+/-4 3-+/-4 22+/-17 8+/-6

TABLE C-I1.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TOTAL GROSS BETA IN DRINKING WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, 2006 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION PERIOD JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC MEAN 4L 61 3.0 +/- 1.4 2.4 +/- 1.3

< 1.9

< 2.1 2.9 +/- 1.3 3.5 +/- 1.4

< 2.1

< 1.9 3.5 +/- 1.5 2.7 +/- 1.2 3.7 +/- 1.4 2.2 +/- 1.2

  • 1.9 2.7 +/- 1.3 2.8 +/- 1.4 2.7 +/- 1.5 4.0 +/- 1.4 2.8 +/- 1.4
  • 2.2 2.5 +/- 1.5 3.0 +/- 1.5 3.0 +/- 1.2 1.9 +/- 1.3 2.5 +/- 1.2 2.7 +/- 1.3 2.7 +/- 1.1

-TABL'E C-II.2---:CON CENTRA-TION S.OF--TRITIUM IN, DRIN KING-WATER-SAMPLES COLLECTED IN...

THE VICIFNIY OF H

EACH BOTTOM ATOMICPOWER STATION, 2006 0 6.

RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION PERIOD JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC MEAN 4L 61

< 167

< 173

< 152

< 173 166 +/- 20

< 165

< 168

< 158

  • 173 166 +/- 13 C -3

TABLE C-II.3 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN DRINKING WATER.SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATIONio 2006 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION PERIOD 4L JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC MEAN 61 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Mn-54

<6

<5

<2

<4

<2

<5

<1

<1

<1

<1

<4

<4 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Zr-95 Nb-95 1-131

<6

< 13

< 6

<16

< 7

< 12

<11

< 5

< 11

< 5

< 12

< 6

< 9

< 11

<3

<5

<2

<6

<3

<4

<6

<4

<8

<4

<9

<4

<7

,<10

<3

<6

<2

<5

<3

<5

<14

< 5

< 12

< 6

< 12

<5

< 10

< 15

<1

<2

<1

<1

<1

<1

. <9

<1

<2

<1

<2

<1

<2

<14

<1

<2

<1

<2

<1

<2

<3

<1

<2

<1

<1

<1

<2

<12

<4

<9

<4

<9

<5

<8

'<15

<5

< 10

<3

<9

<5

<9

<8 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140

<8

<6

<3

<4

<2

<6

<1

<1

<1

<1

<4

<4

<7

<6

<3

<4

<2

<5

<1

<1

<1

<1

<4

<5

< 31

< 26

< 15

< 22

< 25

< 34

< 11

< 17

<7

< 15

< 30

< 21

< 11

< 10

<5

<8

<8

< 11

<3

<6

<2

<4

< 10

<8 3 +/- 4 3

+/- 4 7

+/- 9 3

+/- 4 7

+/- 10 3 +/- 4 6+/-7

',i11 7

+/-7 3 +/-

5 3 +/- 4 21 +/- 17 7 +/-

6

<6

<4

<2

<4

<3

<5

<1

<1

<1

<1

<4

<5

<6

<4

<3

<4

<3

<5

<1

<1

<1

<1

<4

<4

<11

<9

<5

< 10

<8

< 13

<3

<3

<3

<2

<8

<9

<6

<5

<3

<4

<3

<6

<1

<1

<1

<1

<4

<4

< 14

< 10

<5

< 10

<7

< 12

<2

<2

<2

<2

<8

<8

<6

<5

<3

<5

<3

<5

<1

<1

<1

<1

<4

<4

< 11

<9

<4

<9

<6

< 10

<2

<2

<2

<2

<7

<6

<9

< 10

<6

< 12

< 12

< 14

< 13

< 14

< 4

< 12

< 13

<9

<7

<5

<3

<5

<3

<5

<1

<1

<1

<1

<3

<4

<6

<5

<3

<5

<3

<6

<1

<1

<1

<1

<4

<5

< 26

< 25

< 15

< 28

< 31

< 35

< 17

< 17

<8

< 16

< 28

< 23

<8

<9

<5

<9

< 11

< 10

<5

<5

<3

<4

<9

<8 MEAN 3

+/- 4 3

+/- 3 7 +/- 7 3

+/- 4 7 +/- 9 3 +/- 4 6 +/- 7 11 +/- 7 3 +/- 4 3 +/- 4 22 +/- 16 7 +/-

5

TABLE C-II1.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN PREDATORI!& BOTTOM FEEDER (FISH)

SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, 2006 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG WET +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION PERIOD K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-1 34 Cs-1 37 4

PREDATOR 06/20 - 06/20/06 10/30 - 10/30/06 3240 +/- 901

< 75 3860 +/- 884

< 42

< 78

< 66

< 143

< 141 MEAN 3550 +/- 877 59 +/- 46 72 +/- 18 142

+/-

3 BOTTOM FEEDER 06/13 - 06/13/06 10/31

- 11/01/06 MEAN 3130 +/- 833

< 63 3260 +/- 768

< 43

< 65

< 54

< 167

< 160 3195 +/- 184 53 +/- 29 59 +/- 16 164

+/-

10 6

PREDATOR 06/02 - 06/02/06 10/04

- 10/04/06 MEAN BOTTOM FEEDER 05/30 -.06/02/06 10/03 - 10/04/06 MEAN 3980 +/- 997

< 64 3040 +/- 808

< 63

< 76

< 61

< 149

< 195 3510 +/- 1329 64 +/- 1 68 +/- 21 172

+/-

65

<;79

<J57 668-32

<;:j73

<:43 58i:!+/- 42

.<*86

< 65 75

+/- 30

.<.71

<':'47 59; +/- 34

< 158

< 125 142

+/-

47

< 185

< 92

< 76

< 43

< 76

< 51

< 73

< 51

< 200

< 127

< 66

< 51

< 68

< 47

< 84

< 54 59 +/- 46 69 +/- 43 139

+/-

131 64 +/- 36 62 +/- 30 164

+/-

103 59 +/- 21 57 +/- 30 3230 +/- 862

< 77 2810 +/- 672

< 40

< 78

< 39

< 191

< 133

< 186

< 97

< 88

< 32

< 70

< 39 3020 +/- 594 58 +/- 53 59

+/- 55 162

+/-

82 141

+/-

127 60 +/- 79 54 +/- 43

TABLE C-IV.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, 2006 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG DRY +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION PERIOD K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Co-60 Cýs'I34 Cs-137 4J 06/17/06 12/14/06 MEAN 4T 06/17/06 12/14/06 14400 +/- 1350

< 83

< 77

< 97 14500 +/- 1250

< 45

< 52

< 58 14450 +/- 141 64

+/- 53 65

+/-

35 77

+/-

55 19000 +/- 1600

< 100

< 96

< 98 26000 +/- 2630

< 122

< 127

< 132

< 101

< 45-,.

73

+79

< 130

< 1057

< 86

< 68 77

+/- 26 118

+/-

70 217

+/-

176 168

+/-

140

< 107 70

+/-

68 MEAN 22500 +/- 9899 111

+/- 32 112

+/- 44 115

+/- 49 118 i.35 6F 06/17/06 12/14/06 9860 +/- 1380 9430 +/- 1320

  • 92

< 80

< 107

< 56

< 82

< 58

  • 138

< 60 99 110 MEAN 9645 +/- 608 86

+/-

16 82

+/- 72 70

+/- 34 89

+/-

52

TABLE C-IV.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN EXTENDED SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, 2006 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG DRY +/- 2 SIGMA Co-60 Cs-134 STC COLLECTION PERIOD K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Cs-1 37 250 FT A 250 FT BR 500 FT BR 750 FT BR 1000 FT BR 1250 BR 2000 BR 2500 BR 3000 BR 6000 BR 3000 FT 6000 FT 9000 FT 12000 FT 15000 FT 06/17/06 06/17/06 06/17/06 06/17/06 06/17/06 06/17/06 06/17/06 06/17/06 06/17/06 06/17/06 7300 7900 7900 9990 18500 17600 13100 15200 13800 20700

+/-

+

+

+

+/-

+

+

+

+

+

804 1050 1380 1080 1320 1540 1520 1670 627 1590

< 52

< 75

< 95

< 77

< 91

< 94

< 112

< 130

< 46

< 136 91 +/- 60

< 83

< 69

< 61

< 76

< 88 75 +/- 21

< 66

< 87

< 113

< 97

< 98

< 104

< 123

< 152

< 57

< 138 59 +/- 27

< 85

< 101

< 85

< 84

< 99

< 96 230 +/- 57 241 +/- 29 428 +/- 66

< 69

< 98

< 134

< 77

< 117

< 125

< 144

< 136

< 67

< 121

< 56

< 78 182 +/- 63 87 85 94 157 +/- 111 140 73 +/- 25 162 +/- 69 111

+/- 89 107 +/- 72 76 81 187 +/- 68 197 +/- 103 130 +/- 116 MEAN 13199 +/- 9646 103 +/- 59 12/14/06 12/14/06 12/14/06 12/14/06 12/14/06 16500 11200 17400 22800 22600

+/- 1600

+/- 1200

+/- 1470

+/- 1750

+/- 1850

< 83

< 56

< 67

< 71

< 85 MEAN 18100 +/- 9644 73 +/- 24 151 +232 109 58

< 114

< 67

<70 41... <56

< 62

< 62

< 87

< 55

<78

<75 82 40.J:,

63 +/- 16 i-0i~

TABLE C-V.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS BETA IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, 2006 RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER +/- 2 SIGMA WEEK 1

2 3

4 5

6 7

8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18-19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 1

15 17 16 15 15 15 17 22 22 14 15 10 14 16 16 10 f8 9

11

<7 18 11 10 17 11 23 19 23 18 25 20 14 20 20 16 17 15 23 17 15_*

19

  • 18 17 18 4 21 +/-

10 _

34 +/-

21 +/-

24 +/-

28 +/-

16 _

1B

+/-5

+/-5

+/-5

+5

+5

+/-5

_5

+/-5

_5

_5

_5

_5

_5

_5

_5

_5

_.5.

_+5

_5

+/-5 (1)

_6

_5

_5

_5

_4

_5

_5

+6

_5

_6

_5

_5

_5

_5

_4

_5

_5

-5

_5

+5

_5

_5

+4

_6

5
4
7
5
5
6

_5 GROUP I 10 12_ 5 18+

5 12 5

14 t 5 16 +/- 5 15 t 5 18 -5 24 +/-+5 20 _5 13+

5 19+/- 5 11+

5 16+

5 17_ 5 18 5

8+/-5

~7*

(1)r 11 _5 7+/-4 9_5 22 _+6 10+

4 10+/- 5 17+

5 11 _+4 23+

5 17+/- 5 22+

5 18+

5 23 +/-+6 23+

5 16+/- 5 18+/- 5 20 _5 18+

4 21 _+5 15+

5 26 +/-+6 16 +/-5 12+

4 19 5

16+

5 18 4

19_ 6 15+

5 10+/- 4 34 -+7 20+

5 23 _+5 26 +/-+6 18+

5 U

15 19 14 15 18 13 17 28 25 13 13 12 14 18 16 10 7

9 7

9 25 8

11 21 13 23 20 23 24 23 19 20 20 23 16 18 12 27 17 19 18 11 18 21 17 +/-

14 +/-

32 +/-

25 +/-

27 +/-

22 +/-

17 +/-

lz

_5

_5

_5

_5

_5

_5

_5

+6

_5

_5

_5

_5

_5

_5

_5

_5

_5

_4

_5

+6

_4

_5

+5

_4

_5

_5

_6

_5

_6

_5

_5

_5

_5

_4

_5

+4

_6

_5

_5

+5

+4

+4

+6

5

__4

-6

5 t5
6

_5 U

GROUP II 3A 14 +/-5 14+

5 13+

5 13+

5 16+

5 13+

5 21 +/-+5 18+

5 21 +/-+5 14+/- 5 17 5

12+/- 5 17+/- 5 17+/- 5 12+/- 5

< 7 (1)

(1) 12 _5 9+/-5 7+/-5 19+

6 12+

5 7+/-5 19 +/- 5 15 +/- 5 22 +/- 5 16 +/- 5 27 +/- 6 17 +/-5 24 +/-+6 17+

5 15+

5 22 +/-+5 23+

5 14+

4 14+

5 21 +/-+5 21 +/-5 18+

5 16+/- 5 19+/- 5 10 +/- 4 21 +/- 5 17+/- 6 16 +/-5 15+/- 5 21 +6 18 +/- 5 26 +/- 5 23 +/- 6 12 +/- 5 GROUP III 5H2 13+

5 15 +/-5 12+/- 5 14+

6 8+/-5 14 +/- 5 16 +/- 5 20 +/-+6 10+

4 14 5

18+/- 5

< 7 (1) 15+/- 5 9+/-5 13+

5 10+/- 5 12+

5 11+

5 8+/-5 16 5

15+

6 9_5 15+

5 9+/-4 19+

5 20 +/-+5 24+

6 23 +/-+6 18 +/- 6 26 +/- 5 12 +/-5 14 +/-5 19 +/-5 7_4 16+

5 8+/-5 18+

5 15+

5 17+

5 18+

5 14 t 5 9_t5

-27 +/- 6 18 +/- 5 15 +/- 5 22 +/- 5 20 +/- 5 26 +/- 6 23 +/- 6 18 +/- 5 18 +/- 5 MEAN 17 +/- 10 17 +/- 11 17 +/- 12 16 +/- 10 15 +/- 10 (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION C -

8

MONTHLY AND YEARLY MEAN VALUES OF GROSS BETA CONCENTRATIONS (E-3 PCIICU METER) IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF PEACH BOTTOM, 2006 TABLE C-V.2 GROUP I - ON-SITE LOCATIONS GROUP II - INTERMEDIATE DISTANCE LOCATIONS COLLECTION MIN.

MAX.

PERIOD MEAN +;,

2 SDzý,:

GROUP III - CONTROL LOCATIONS COLLECTION PERIOD MIN.

MAX.

MEAN +

2 SD COLLECTION PERIOD MIN.

MAX.

MEAN+/-

2 SD PERIOD 12/30/2005 02/03/2006 03/03/2006 03/31/2006 04/28/2006 06/01/2006 06/30/2006 08/03/2006 08/31/2006 09/28/2006 11/03/2006 11/30/2006 02/03/2006 03/03/2006 03/31/2006 04/28/2006 06/01/2006 06/30/2006 08/03/2006 08/31/2006 09/28/2006 11/03/2006 11/30/2006 01/02/2007 12 13 10

<7

<7 8

17 14 12 11 10 16 19 28 19 18 25 21 25 23 27 19 34 28 15 20 14 13 12 12 22 19 19 17 20 22

+4

+/-9

+/-4

+/-9

+/- 12

+ 7

+/-5

+/-5

+/-9

+/-5

+/- 17

+8 12/30/2005 -

02/03/2006 02/03/2006 - 03/03/2006 03/03/2006 - 03/31/2006 03/31/2006 - 04/28/2006 04/28/2006 - 06/01/2006 06/01/2006 - 06/30/2006 06/30/2006 - 08/03/2006 08/03/2006 - 08/31/2006 08/31/2006 - 09/28/2006 09/28/2006 -

11/03/2006 11/03/2006 - 11/30/2006 11/30/2006 - 01/02/2007 13 16 14 + 34;1 13 21 18 +/- 7.T, 12 17 15 +/- 5,

<7 17 11 +/-9!

7 19 12+/- 9 7

19 13 +/-10, 16 27 21 +/-10 15 23 19 +/- 8:1,;

14 21 17 +/-8 10 21 17 +/-

15 21 17 +/- 5",

12 26 20 +/- 1-2' 12130/2005 02/03/2006 03/03/2006 03/31/2006 04/28/2006 06/01/2006 06/30/2006 08/03/2006 08/31/2006 09/28/2006 11/03/2006 11/30/2006 02/031/2006 03/03/2006 03/31/2006 04/28/2006 06/01/2006 06/30/2006 08/03/2006 08/31/2006 09/28/2006 11/03/2006 11/30/2006 01/02/2007 12 14

<7 9

8 9

18 12 8

9 15 18 15 20 18 13 16 15 24 19 18 18 22 26 13 +/- 3 17 +/- 6 13 +/- 12 10 +/- 4 12 +/- 7 11 +7 21 +/-6 15+/- 7 14 +/- 10 15+/- 8 18+/- 7 21 +/-8 12/30/05 - 01/02/2007

< 7 34 17 +/- 7 12/30/05 - 01/02/2007

< 7 27 16 +/- 7 j:u 12/30/05 - 01/02/2007

< 7 26 15 +/- 7 IL

TABLE C-V.3 CONCENTRATION OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, 2006 RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION PERIOD Be-7 Mn-54 Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 1B 12/30 03/31 06/30 09/28

- 03/31/06

- 06/30/06

- 09/28/06

- 12/28/06 74 +/- 40 70 +/- 53 106 +/- 52 63 +/- 20

<5

<2

<2

< 2

<4

<3

<3

< 3

<2

<3

<2

<3

<2

<2

<3

<2

<2 MEAN 78 +/- 38 2.7 +/- 2.4 3.7 +/- 2.8 2.6 +/- 1.5 2.5 +/- 1.2 2.2 +/- 0.6 1C 12/30 03/31 06/30 09/28 03/31/06 06/30/06 09/28/06 12/28/06 68 +/- 53 93 +/- 52 97 +/- 43 67 +/- 26

<3

<3

<2

<3

<6

<5

<2

<4

<6

<2

<1

<4

<5

<2

<2

<3

<3

<2

<2

<3 MEAN 81 +/- 32 2.7 +/- 1.4 4.2 +/- 3.6 3.1 +/- 4.4 2.7 +/- 2.9 2.6 +/- 1.3 12/30 - 03/31/06 96 +/- 44

ý:-::':

0313t;:-,- 6a!0 6*5 3

}:'.,p.7 :5.;.,;

06/30 - 09/28/06 69 +/- 30 09/28 - 12/28/06 62 +/- 26

<4

<2

<3

<7

<3

< 3

<4

<4

<2

<3

<3 MEAN 3A 12/30 03/31 06/30 09/28 84 +/- 43 3.0 +/- 1.8 4.5 +/- 3.0 2.5 +/- 2.7 MEAN

- 03/31/06

- 06/30/06

- 09/28/06

- 12/28/06

- 04/03/06

- 06/30/06

- 10/02/06

- 01/02/07

< 65 75 +/- 43 85 +/- 30 58 +/- 27

<5

<3

<2

<2

<7

<5

<2

<3

<4

<3

<2

<3 2.8 +/- 1.8

<4

<2

<2

<3 2.7 +/- 1.2

<4

<2

<2

<2 71 +/- 23 3.1

+/- 2.3 4.3 +/- 4.8 3.0 +/- 1.3 2.8 +/- 2.1 2.7 + 2.4 5H2 01/03 03/31 07/03 10/02

< 129 78 +/- 52 95 +/- 30 65 +/- 30

<5

<2

<2

<3

<8

<4

<3

<3

<1

<3

<3

<4

<5

<2

<1

<3

<4

<3

<3

<3 MEAN 92 +/- 55 3.0 +/- 2.3 4.5 +/- 4.4 2.7 +/- 2.0 2.9 +/- 3.0 3.0 +/- 1.6 C -

10

TABLE C-VI.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF 1-131 IN AIR IODINE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, 2006 RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER +/- 2 SIGMA GROUP I 1z I

GROUP I1 3A I

GROUP III 5H2 WEEK 1

1

< 20 2

< 44 3

< 34 4

< 63 7

< 44 6

< 42 7

< 48 8

< 46 9

< 33 10

< 32 11

< 49 12

< 39 13

< 55 14

< 36 15

< 39 16

< 23 19

< 59 20

< 69 21

< 67 22

< 41 23

< 53 24

< 55 25

< 29 26

< 23 27

< 50 28

< 55 29

< 65 30

< 60 31

< 37 32

< 46 33

< 20 34

< 48 35

< 21 36

< 33 37

< 51 38

< 53 39

< 66 40

< 29 41

< 54 42

< 53 43

< 27 44

< 59 45

< 46 46

< 52 47

< 41 48

< 31 49

< 55 50

< 56 51

< 51 52

< 32 B

ic

< 21

< 20

< 21

< 44

< 45

< 43

< 34

< 34

< 33

< 65

< 62

< 64

< 45

< 45

< 44

< 43

< 42

< 42

< 49

< 48

< 48

< 47

< 46

< 46

< 34

< 33

< 33

< 32

< 32

< 32

< 50

< 49

< 49

< 40

< 39

< 39

< 56

< 53

< 56

< 36

< 37

< 36

< 40

< 39

< 39

< 44

< 43

< 43

--47

<47

< 47 5

-f54'

< 40

< 59

< 59

< 69

< 69

< 69

< 69

< 67

< 67

< 41

< 41

< 41

< 54

< 52

< 52

< 56

< 56

< 56

< 30

< 29

< 29

< 23

< 23

< 24

< 49

< 51

< 28

< 55

< 55

< 56

< 65

< 63

< 64

< 60

< 61

< 63

< 30

< 37

< 38

< 46

< 46

< 47

< 19

< 19

< 20

< 48

< 48

< 49

< 21

< 21

< 21

< 33

< 33

< 27

< 51

< 51

< 52

< 53

< 53

< 53

< 67

< 67

< 67

< 29

< 29

< 29

< 54

< 54

< 55

< 67

< 67

< 68

< 27

< 27

< 27

< 59

< 59

< 60

< 46

< 46

< 47

< 52

< 52

<53

< 41

< 42

<42

< 31

< 31

< 32

< 35

< 55

<z 55

< 56

< 56

< 57

< 51

< 51

< 52

< 32

< 32

<32

<21

  • 14

<15

  • 21
  • 13

< 26

<17

  • 20
  • 18
  • 14
  • 16

<18

<19

< 17

<19

< 20

<22

  • 42
  • 20
  • 24
  • 16

<16

<19

  • 21

< 34

< 31

  • 23
  • 26
  • 23

<13

< 21

  • 21
  • 14
  • 20
  • 25

< 39

<7

  • 25
  • 14

<7

< 47

< 33

< 46

<10

  • 32
  • 46

<12

< 42

< 24

<18

<11 27 22

+/- 20 MEAN 45

+/-

26 45

+/-

26 46

+/-

26 45

+/- 2 C -

11

TABLE C-VII.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF 1-131 IN MILK SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, 2006 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER 12 SIGMA NEARBY FARMS I

INTERMEDIATE DISTANCE FARMS D

L COLLECTIOI\\

PERIOD 01/16/06 02/14/06 03/13/06 04/10/06 04/24/06 05/08/06 05/22/06 06/05/06 06/19/06 07/03/06 07/17/06 07/31/06 08/14/06 08/28/06 09/11/06 09/25/06 10/09/06 10/23/06 11/06/06 11/20/06 12/18/06 J

0 R

S B

C E

T

< 0.4

< 0.7

< 0.2

< 0.3

< 0.7

< 0.5

< 0.6

< 1.1 (1)

< 0.8

< 0.7

< 0.6

  • 0.8

< 0.4

< 0.6

< 0.3

< 0.5

< 0.5

< 0.5

< 0.7

< 0.7

< 0.6

< 0.4

< 0.6

< 0.2

< 0.5

< 0.7

< 0.7

< 0.7

< 1.4 (1)

< 0.8

< 0.4

< 0.8

< 0.8

< 0.5

< 0.5

< 0.3

< 0.5

< 0.6

< 0.5

< 0.8

< 0.9

< 0.6

< 0.4

< 0.8

< 0.2

< 0.3

< 0.2

< 0.8

< 0.7

< 2.0 (1)

< 0.9

< 0.5

< 0.5

< 0.9

< 0.6

< 0.8

< 0.3

< 0.5

< 0.6

< 0.6

< 0.5

< 1.0

< 0.7

< 0.3

< 0.6

< 0.4

< 0.2

< 0.2

< 0.6

< 0.4

< 1.7 (1)

< 0.9

< 0.7

< 0.8

< 0.6

< 0.4

< 0.5

< 0.3

< 0.5

< 0.5

< 0.5

< 0.4

< 0.7

< 0.6

< 0.6

< 0.7

< 0.5

< 0.9

< 0.6

< 0.5

< 0.3

< 0.8

< 0.6:

< 0.3!

< 0,5

< 0.6

< 0.5

< 0.4

< 0.8

< 0.5

< 0.5

< 0.5

< 0.7

< 0.6

< 0.6

< 0.8

< 0.5

< 0.5

< 0.2

< 0.2

< 0.6

< 0.5

< 0.7

< 1.5 (1)

< 1.2 (1)

< 0.6

< 0.6

< 0.8

< 0.4

< 0.5

< 0.3

< 0.6

< 0.5

< 0.6

< 0.5

< 0.8

< 0.7 MEAN 0.6

+ 0.4 0.6 + 0.5 0.7

+ 0.8 0.6

+ 0.6 0.7 + 0.4 0.5 + 0.4 0.6 t' 0.5 0.5

+/- 0.2 0.6

+/- 0.3 0.7

+/- 0.1 0.6

+/- 0.6

%"i (1) SEE PROGRAM CHANGES SECTION FOR EXPLANATION

TABLE C-VII.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN MILK SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, 2006 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION PERIOD J

01/15/06 02/13/06 03/13/06 04/09/06 04/23/06 05/07/06 05/21/06 06/04/06 06/19/06 07/02/06 07/17/06 07/30/06 08/14/06 08/28/06 i 09/5/06...-.

10/09/06 10/23/06 11/06/06 11/20/06 12/18/06 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 1310 +/- 207 1260 +/- 127 1160 +/- 126 1350 +/- 124 1330 +/- 42 1370 +/- 124 1340 +/- 133 1290 +/- 53 1400 +/- 182 1220 +/- 146 1390 +/- 71 1360 +/- 120 1310 +/- 157 1440 +/- 143

-1*370 -+/--189.--

-1380

+/- *205-1190 +/- 135 1240 +/- 114 1410 +/- 180 1470 +/- 132 1200 +/- 169

< 12

<9

<9

<7

<2

<7

<8

<3

< 12

<8

<3

<5

<6

<5

<4

<4

<8

<5

<5

< 11

<7

<8

<7

<2

<7

<8

<3

< 11

<8

<4

<6

<6

<7

<6

<5

<8

<6

<7

< 43

< 39

< 39

< 27

< 41

< 38

< 43

< 30

< 41

< 34

< 16

< 41

< 39

< 33

<39

< 46

< 52

< 56

< 55

< 22

< 10

< 12

< 12

<9

< 13

< 14

< 14

< 10

< 14

< 10

<5

< 11

< 13

<7

<12

< 13

< 15

< 14

< 12

<7 MEAN 0

01/15/06 02/13/06 03/13/06 04109/06 04/23/06 05/07/06 05/21/06 06/04/06 06/19/06 07/02106 07/17/06 07/30/06 08/14/06 08/28/06 09/11/06 09/25/06 10/09/06 10/23/06 11/06/06 11/20/06 12/18/06 1323 +/- 171 7 +/- 5 7 +/- 5 38 +/- 20 1260 +/- 143 1140 +/- 147 1170 +/- 117 1040 +/- 127 1260 +/- 44 1110 +/- 141 1330 +/- 125 1270 +/- 58 1100 +/- 182 1350 +/- 137 1270 +/- 65 1320 +/- 163 1320 +/- 144

-1270 +/- 105 1220 +/- 191 1300 +/- 208 1090 +/- 117 1300 +/- 104 1340 +/- 138 1160 +/- 110 1110 +/- 185

< 10

<8

<8

< 10

<2

<8

<9

<3

<8

<7

<4

<6

<4

<4

<8

<7

<5

<4

<4

<4

<8

<9

<9

<8

<9

<2

<8

<8

<3

<9

<7

<4

<6

<8

<4

<9

<9

<6

<5

<6

<5

<9

< 34

< 43

< 34

< 34

< 44

< 39

< 43

< 34

< 41

< 31

< 16

< 39

< 27

< 21

< 39

< 37

< 44

< 48

< 41

< 52

< 28 11

+/- 6

< 10

< 12

< 10'

< 11

< 14

< 12

< 14

< 10

< 15

< 10

<5

< 12

< 10

<8

<11

< 15

< 14

< 14

< 12

< 14

<7 MEAN 1225 +/- 193 6 +/- 5 7 +/- 5 36 +/- 17 11

+/- 5 C -

13

TABLE C-VII.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN MILK SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, 2006 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION PERIOD K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 R

01/16/06 02/13/06 03/13/06 04/10/06 04/24/06 05/08/06 05/22/06 06/05/06 06/19/06 07/03/06 07/17/06 07/31/06 08/14/06 08/28/06

-:-;09/,11106--.

10/09/06 10/23/06 11/06/06 11/20/06 12/18/06 MEAN S

01/16/06 02/13/06 03/13/06 04/10/06 04/24/06 05/08/06 05/22/06 06/05/06 06/19/06 07/03/06 07/17/06 07/31/06 08/14/06 08/28/06 09/11/06 09/25/06 10/09/06 10/23/06 11/06/06 11/20/06 12/18/06 1470 +/- 143 1370 +/- 148 1380 +/- 143 1490 +/- 152 1350 +/- 45 1370 +/- 137 1330 +/- 139 1300 +/- 64 1350 +/- 203 1390 +/- 126 1440 +/- 68 1270 +/- 151 1480 +/- 213 1350 +/- 116

-1220 p191 1250 +/- 133 1300 +/- 128 1320 +/- 120 1200 +/- 110 1280 +/- 170

<<9

< 10

<9

<8

<2

<9

'<9

<<4

< 13

<9

"<4

<<5

<<8

"<4

<5

<4

<<4

<3

.<6

<9

<9

<9

<9

<2

<9

<9

<4

< 13

<8

<4

<6

<9

<5

<6

<5

<5

<4

<8

< 30

< 40

< 39

< 34

< 42

< 41

< 46

< 36

< 43

< 27

< 19

< 40

< 37

< 27

<49

30

< 43

< 45

< 37

< 42

< 26

<8

< 12

< 13

<9

< 13

< 12

< 14

< 12

< 13

< 11

<6

< 14

<6

<7

< 13

< 14

< 14

<9

< 14

<5 1349 +/- 164 1150 +/- 152 1280 +/- 136 1390 +/- 160 1470 +/- 133 1270 +/- 50 1320 +/- 140 1250 +/- 132 1290 +/- 61 1350 +/- 185 1310 +/- 158 1300 +/- 74 1310 +/- 148 1270 +/- 142 1260 +/- 116 1330 +/- 184 1220 +/- 213 1260 +/- 108 1130 +/- 126 1320 +/- 157 1180 +/- 126 1150 +/- 123 7 +/- 5

<9

< 10

<9

<8

<3

<8

<8

<3

< 12

< 10

<4

<5

<5

<4

<7

<8

<4

<6

<6

<4

<6 7 +/- 5 37 +/- 16 11

+/- 6

<9

<8

< 10

<7

<3

< 10

<8

<3

< 12

<9

<4

<8

<6

<5

<8

< 11

<5

<7

<7

<4

<6

< 37

< 40

< 45

< 30

< 48

< 44

< 44

< 33

< 43

< 38

< 18

< 41

< 32

< 24

< 33

< 31

< 40'

< 56

< 52

< 42

< 18

< 12

< 11

< 13

<8

< 15

< 13

< 14

< 10

< 14

< 11

<6

< 14

< 10

<6

< 11

< 10

< 13

<14

< 13

< 15

<5 MEAN 1277 +/- 163 7 +/- 5 7 +/- 5 37 +/- 20 11

+/- 6 C -

14

TABLE C-VII.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN MILK SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, 2006 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION K-40 PERIOD T

01/15/06 1230 +/- 153 02/14/06 1210 +/- 122 03/13/06 1280 +/- 129 04/09/06 1250 +/- 134 04/23/06 1280 +/- 46 05/07/06 1240 +/- 146 05/21/06 1370 +/- 141 06/04/06 1230 t 61 06/19/06 1240 +/- 194 07/02/06 1240 t 148 07/17/06 1340 + 62 07/30/06 1230 + 128 08/14/06 1340 + 157 08/28/06 1330 +/- 140

09/11/0I6,-*.1270+/- 212 09/25/06 1230 t 197 10/09/06 1340 +/- 120 10/23/06 1360 +/- 119 11/06/06 1290 +/- 128 11/20/06 1290 t 113 12/18/06 1430 +/- 158 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140

< 11

<8

<8

<8

<2

<8

<8

<3

< 13

<9

<3

<4

<6

<6

<4

<4

<5

<4

<7

< 11

<8

<8

<8

<2

<8

<8

<3

<13

<8

<4

<6

<8

<6

... '*.10-.

< 8'

< 5

<5

<5

<4

<8

< 38

< 37

< 38

< 28

< 44

< 37

< 43

< 33

< 44

< 34

< 17

< 37

  • 32

< 34

< 42

  • 50
  • 40

< 39

  • 29

< 12

< 11

< 11

<10

< 15

< 13

  • 14
  • 10

< 13

<9

<5

  • 10

< 10

<9

<11

<14

< 15

< 13

<8 MEAN 1287 +/- 119 7 +/- 6 7 t 5 37

  • 14 11 +/- 5 C -

15

TABLE C-VIII.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN FOOD PRODUCT SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, 2006 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG WET +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION PERIOD 1Q 05/30/06 Domestic Grape Leaves 1Q 05/30/06 Peas 1Q 05/30/06 Poke Weed 1Q 07/03106 Cabbage 1Q 07/03/06 Domestic Grape Leaves 1Q 07/03/06

- Lettuce---------.

1Q 07/31/06 Cabbage 1Q 07/31/06 Lettuce 1Q 08/28/06 Corn Leaf 1Q 08/28/06 String Bean Leaves 1Q 08/28/06 Turnip Greens 1Q 10/02/06 Unwashed Bean Leaves 1Q 10/02/06 Unwashed Celery Leaves 1Q 10/02/06 Unwashed Turnip Greens Be-7 481 +/- 165 156 +/- 101 378 +/- 116 878 + 113 2310 + 121 1090 +/- 43 671 +/- 83 516 +/- 234 1010 +/- 128 560 +/- 47 316 +/- 43 1200 +/- 94 584 +/- 95 161 +/- 45 Mn-54 Co-58 Co-60 1-131

< 21

< 12

< 18

< 14

< 12

<6

<5

< 21

< 10

<2

<1

<7

<8

<6 Cs-134 Cs-137

  • 24

< 15

< 24

< 15

< 13

<6

<6

< 22

< 13

<2

<2

<7

<9

<6

< 19

< 11

< 20

< 14

< 11

<6

<5

< 21

< 10

<1

<3

<7

<9

<6

< 122 (1)

(1)

< 131 (1)

< 49

< 47

< 15

< 53

< 52

< 38

< 52

< 50

< 47

< 56

< 36

< 22

< 12

< 17

< 16

< 13

<6

<5

< 15

<9

<1

<1

<6

<7

<5

< 20

< 12

< 18

< 15

< 12 8+/-

<5

< 18

< 10

<1

<1

<7

<9

<6 5

(1)

MEAN 737 +/- 1117 10 +/- 13 12 +/- 15 10 +/- 13 57 +/- 65 10 +/- 13 10 +/- 12 (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION

  • THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES C -

16

TABLE C-VIII.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN FOOD PRODUCT SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, 2006 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG WET +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION PERIOD 2B 05/30/06 Ferns 2B 05/30/06 Poke Weed 2B 05/30/06 Tulip Tree Leaves 2B 07/03/06 Cabbage 2B 07/03/06 Ferns

-2B3,ý _

07/03/06 2B 07/31/06 Cabbage 2B 07/31/06 Lettuce 2B 08/28/06 Cabbage 2B 08/28/06 Corn Leaf 26 08/28/06 Lettuce 2B 10/02/06 Be-7 Mn-54 Co-58 Co-60 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 537 +/- 272 164 +/- 39 346 +/- 120 303 +/- 106 4020 +/- 162 930 +/-34 126 +/- 62 306 +/- 80 403 +/- 43 680 +/- 45 305 +/- 35 381 +/- 67

< 26

<3

< 14

< 18

< 13

< 4

<5

<5

<1

<2

<1

<6

<6

<7

< 32

< 25

< 62 (1)

< 32

<4

<3

< 18

< 15

< 17

< 19

< 13

< 14

<5

<5

<5

<5

<6

<7

<2

<1

<3

<2

<2

<1

<7

<7

<7

<8

<9

<8

< 53

< 133 (1)

< 43

< 46

< 11

< 48

< 60

< 45

< 54

< 52

< 42

< 45

< 47

<3

< 15

< 18

< 12

<4

<4

<5

<1

<2

<1

<5

<5

<6

< 24

<3

< 15

< 18

< 12 5+/-

<5

< 5

<1

<2

<2

<6

<6

<7 4

(1)

Unwashed Beet Greens 2B 10/02/06 < 62 Unwashed Cabbage (Head) 2B 10/02/06 353 +/- 66 Unwashed Turnip Greens MEAN 637 +/- 1998 8 +/- 14 9 +/- 16 9 +/- 14 53 +/- 52 8 +/- 17 8 +/- 14 (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION

  • THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES C -

17

TABLE C-VIII.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN FOOD PRODUCT SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, 2006 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG WET +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION PERIOD 55 05/30/06 Cabbage 55 05/30/06 Rhubarb 55 05/30/06 <

Peas 55 07/03/06 Rhubarb 55 07/03/06 Cabbage 55 07/03/06

Cor~nLeaves 55 07/31/06 Rhubarb 55 07/31/06 Turnip Tops 55 08/28/06 Corn Leaves 55 08/28/06 Rhubarb 55 08/28/06 Tobacco Leaves 55 10/02/06 Unwashed Rhubarb Leaves 55 10/02/06 Unwashed Sweet Corn Leaves 55 10/02/06 Unwashed Yam Leaves Be-7 89 +/- 47 156 +/- 69 193 291 +/- 54 555 +/- 111 799 +/- 156 156 +/- 65 522 +/- 73 491 +/- 102 178 +/- 27 176 +/- 32 316 +/- 36 2070 + 141 806 + 73 Mn-54 Co-58 Co-60

<7

< 11

< 16

<9

< 21

< 20

<6

<6

<3

<2

<2

<4

<8

<6

<9

< 13

< 20

< 10

< 20

< 24

<6

<7

<4

<3

<3

<4

< 10

<7

<7

< 12

< 16

<9

< 24

< 25

<5

<5

<3

<2

<2

<4

<7

<6 1-13

< 63

< 38

< 65

< 30

< 46

< 60

< 51

< 52

< 37

< 58

< 59

< 26

< 58

< 40 31 Cs-134 Cs-137 (1)

< 8

< 10 (1)

< 16

< 10

< 21

< 23

<5

<5

<3

<2

<2

<3

<7

<5

<7

< 10

< 16

< 10

< 22

< 22

,5

<6

<3

<2

<2

<4

<8

<6 MEAN 486 +/- 1028 9 +/- 12 10 +/- 14 9 +/- 15 49+/- 25 9 +/- 14 9 +/- 13 (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION

  • THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES C -

18

TABLE C-IX.1 QUARTERLY TLD RESULTS FOR PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, 2006 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MILLI-ROENTGEN/STD. MONTH +/- 2 STANDARD DEVIATIONS STATION CODE IA 1B ic 1D 1E 1F 1G 1H 11 1J 1K 1L iM IR 2

28 3A 4K 5

1NN 6B 14 15 16 17 18 19 22 23 24 26 27 31A 32 40 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 I

MEAN

+2S. D 6.9 + 1.7 5.9 + 1.7 7.2 +/- 1.6 6.9 _ 1.4 6.6 +/- 1.5 8.0 + 1.7 5.3 +/- 1.7 7.1 t 1.7 5.9 +/- 1.7 8.4 +/- 3.3 7.4 + 1.5 6.4 + 1.5 4.4 + 1.4 4.9 + 1.8 8.5 _ 1.9 6.9 + 1.5 6.7 _+2.1 5.2 + 1.6 4.8 +/- 1.5 6.5 +/- 1.9 7.6 +/- 1.9 5.9 +/- 1.5 5.9 + 3.1 7.2 +/- 1.6 6.8 + 1.6 8.2 _ 2.2 7.2 +/- 1.3 6.5 + 1.6 7.1 + 1.5 7.3 +/- 1.5 5.7 +/- 1.9 7.7 +/- 1.7 7.4 +/- 2.3 5.7 +/- 1.7 7.6 +/- 1.9 8.0 + 1.8 6.4 +/- 2.4 7.8 +/- 0.5 6.8 +/- 1.6 7.4 +/- 1.4 6.3 +/- 1.8 7.7 +0.4 7.4 + 1.8 6.9 + 1.9 8.0 + 1.7 7.3 + 1.7 JAN - MAR APR - JUN JUL - SEP OCT - DEC 7.9 +/- 0.9 6.8 +/- 0.7 7.9 +/- 0.6 7.7 +/- 0.3 7.5 +/- 0.5 9.0 +/- 0.2 6.3 +/- 0.3 8.0 +/- 0.7 6.9 +/- 0.6 8.8 +/- 0.6 8.4 +/- 0.5 7.0 +/- 0.6 5.1 +/- 0.4 5.8 +/- 0.5 6`3 +/--0.7-f' 9.5 +/- 0.7 7.8 +/- 0.7 7.8 +/- 0.7 6.1 +/- 0.8 5.5 +/- 1.3 7.6 +/- 0.5 8.5 +/- 0.5 6.6 +/- 0.2 7.5 +/- 0.8 8.2 +/- 0.5 7.6 +/- 0.6 8.9 +/- 0.7 8.0 +/- 0.2 7.4 +/- 0.5 7.9 +/- 0.6 8.1 +/- 0.6 6.9 +/- 0.4 8.5 +/- 0.4 8.7 +/- 1.2 6.5 +/- 0.6 8.5 +/- 0.7 8.9 +/- 0.6 7.7 +/- 0.8 9.3 +/- 1.1 7.6 +/- 0.4 8.2 +/- 0.4 7.2 +/- 0.6 8.9 +/- 1.3 8.4 +/- 0.3 7.7 +/- 0.5 8.6 +/- 0.4 8.3 +/- 0.7 6.1 +/- 0.5 5.3 +/- 0.2 6.8 +/- 0.3 6.6 +/- 0.4 6.0 +/- 0.4 7.3 +/- 0.6 4.6 +/- 0.5 6.6 +/- 0.3 5.4 +/- 0.3 7.0 +/- 0.8 7.1 +/- 0.5 5.5 +/- 0.9 3.8 +/- 0.3 4.2 +/- 0.2 7.7 +/- 0.3 6.4 +/- 0.3 6.0 +/- 0.6 4.5 +/- 0.4 4.1 +/- 0.2 5.8 +/- 1.0 6.7 +/- 0.4 5.1 +/- 0.4 6.2 +/- 0.5 6.8 +/- 0.6 6.4 +/- 0.5 7.4 +/- 0.5 6.8 +/- 0,9 5.8 +/- 0.4 6.6 +/- 0.2 7.1 +/- 0.7 5.0 +/- 0.3 7.1 +/- 0.5 6.6 +/- 0.4 5.2 +/- 0.8 6.9 +/- 0.3 7.1 +/- 0.7 5.3 +/- 0.5 6.8 +/- 0.2 6.3 +/- 0.2 6.9 +/- 0.3 5.6 +/- 0.4 7.4 +/- 0.4 7.4 +/- 1.8 6.2 +/- 0.5 7.5 +/- 0.4 6.6 +/- 0.5 7.2 +/- 0.5 6.5 +/- 0.6 7.9 +/- 0.8 7.3 +/- 0.3 7.0 +/- 0.6 8.4 +/- 0.5 5.7 +/- 0.3 7.7 +/- 0.5 6.3 +/- 0.5 11 +/- 12 7.5 +/- 0.6 7.0 +/- 3.8 4.8 +/- 0.4 5.5 +/- 1.6 9.0 +/- 0.4 7.1 +/- 0.5 7.3 +/- 0.6 5.7 +/- 0.3 5.4 +/- 0.3 6.9 +/- 0.6 8.3 +/- 0.3 6.4 +/- 0.7 3.8 +/- 8.2 7.3 +/- 0.5 7.3 +/- 0.4 9.3 +/- 3.4 7.3 +/- 0.3 7.0 +/- 0.6 7.6 +/- 0.9 7.7 +/- 0.5 6.1 +/- 0.7 8.3 +/- 0.6 8.0 +/- 0.6 6.4 +/- 0.4 8.3 +/- 3.8 8.6 +/- 0.4 7.1 +/- 3.5 7.9 +/- 0.4 7.3 +/- 0.3 7.8 +/- 0.5 7.0 +/- 0.5 8.3 +/- 0.5 7.6 +/- 0.4 7.6 +/- 0.4 8.8 +/- 1.0 7.7 +/- 0.7 6.3 +/- 0.5 5.1 t 0.6 6.3 +/- 0.4 6.1 +/- 0.4 6.0 +/- 0.5 7.3 +/- 0.6 4.6 +/- 0.3 6.2 +/- 0.2 5.1 +/- 0.2 7.1 +/- 0.5 6.6 +/- 0.4 6.0 +/- 0.4 3.7 +/- 0.4 4.0 +/- 0.3 7.6 +/- 0.6 6.1 +/- 0.6 5.6 +/- 0.5 4.6 +/- 0.2 4.2 +/- 1.2 5.5 +/- 0.4 6.9 +/- 0.3 5.3 +/- 0.4 6.0 +/- 0.3 6.3 +/- 0.5 5.9 +/- 0.4 7.1 +/- 0.5 6.5 +/- 0.7 5.8 +/- 0.3 6.3 +/- 0.4 6.4 +/- 0.2 4.9 +/- 0.4 6.8 +/- 0.5 6.3 +/- 0.6 4.8 +/- 0.3 6.7 +/- 0.4 7.4 +/- 0.4 5.5 +/- 0.4 6.7 +/- 0.9 5.9 +/- 0.3 6.7 +/- 0.4 5.5 +/- 0.2 7.1 +/- 0.3 6.2 +/- 0.4 5.9 +/- 0.3 7.1 +/- 0.6 6.5 +/- 0.2 C

19

TABLE C-IX.2 MEAN QUARTERLY TLD RESULTS FOR THE SITE BOUNDARY, INTERMEDIATE AND CONTROL LOCATIONS FOR PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, 2006 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MILLI-ROENTGEN/ STD. MONTH +/- 2 STANDARD DEVIATIONS OF THE STATION DATA COLLECTION PERIOD SITE BOUNDARY

+/-2S. D.

INTERMEDIATE CONTROL JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC 7.6 +/- 2.3 6.1 +/-2.2 7.3 +/- 2.7 5.9 +/- 2.2 7.8 +/- 1.9 6.3 +/- 1.9 7.3 +/- 2.4 6.1 +/- 1.6 7.5 +/- 0.9 6.0 +/- 1.6 6.9 +/- 1.1 5.8 +/- 1.3 TABLE C-IX.3

SUMMARY

OF THE AMBIENT DOSIMETRY PROGRAM FOR PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, 2006 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MILL/-ROENTGEN/STD. MONTH""

LOCATION SAMPLES ANALYZED PERIOD PERIOD MINIMUM MAXIMUM 3.8 9.3 3.7 11 SITE BOUNDARY INTERMEDIATE CONTROL 92 80 16 PERIOD MEAN

+/-2S. D.

6.9 +/- 2.4 6.7 +/- 2.7 6.5 +/- 1.8 PRE-OP MEAN

+/-2S. D.

5.4 +/- 1.7 5.3 +/- 1.3 5.7 t 1.8 4.9 8

THE PRE-OPERATIONAL MEAN WAS CALCULATED FROM MONTHLY TLD READINGS 01/07/73 TO 08/05/73.

SITE BOUNDARY STATIONS - 1A, 1B, IC, 1D, IE, 1F, 1G, 1H, 11, IJ, 1K, IL, IM, INN, IP, IQ, IR, 2, 2B, 40 INTERMEDIATE STATIONS - 3A, 4K, 5, 6B, 14,15,17, 22, 23, 26, 27, 31A, 32, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51 CONTROL STATIONS - 16, 18, 19, 24 C -

20

TABLE C-X.1

SUMMARY

OF COLLECTION DATES FOR SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, 2006 SURFACE WATER (TRITIUM LIQUID SCINTILLATION)

SAMPLING PERIOD JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC 1LL 12/28/2005 - 03/29/2006 03/29/2006 - 06/28/2006 06/28/2006 - 09/27/2006 09/27/2006 - 12/27/2006 1MM 12/28/2005 - 03/29/2006 03/29/2006 - 06/28/2006 06/28/2006 - 09/27/2006 09/27/2006 - 12/27/2006 SURFACE WATER (GAMMA SPECTROSCOPY) 1LL 1MM SAMPLING PERIOD JAN FEB MAR APR

.... -M A Y-..

JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 12/28/2005 -

02/01/2006 -

03/01/2006 -

03/29/2006 -

05/Q.3/20.06. -

05/31/2006.

06/28/2006 08/02/2006 08/30/2006 09/27/2006 11/01/2006 11/29/2006 02/01/2006 03/01/2006 03/29/2006 05/03/2006 05/31/2006

06/28/2006 08/02/2006 08/30/2006 09/27/2006 11/01/2006 11/29/2006 12/27/2006 12/28/2005 02/01/2006 03/01/2006 03/29/2006 05/03/2006 05/31/2006;,

06/28/2006 08/02/2006 08/30/2006 09/27/2006 11/01/2006 11/29/2006

- 02/01/2006

- 03/01/2006

- 03/29/2006

- 05/03/2006 05/31/2006

- 08/0212006

- 08/30/2006

- 09/27/2006 11/01/2006 11/29/2006 12/27/2006 DRINKING WATER (TRITIUM)

SAMPLING PERIOD 4L 61 JAN-MAR 12/30/2005 03/31/2006 12/30/2005

- 03/31/2006 APR-JUN 03/31/2006

- 06/30/2006 03/31/2006 - 06/30/2006 JUL-SEP 06/30/2006

- 09/28/2006 06/30/2006 - 09/28/2006 OCT-DEC 09/28/2006 12/28/2006 09/28/2006 - 12/28/2006 DRINKING WATER (GROSS BETA & GAMMA)

SAMPLING PERIOD 4L 61 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 12/30/2005 02/03/2006 03/03/2006 03/31/2006 05/05/2006 06/01/2006 06/30/2006 08/03/2006 08/31/2006 09/28/2006 11/03/2006 11/30/2006 02/03/2006 03/03/2006 03/31/2006 05/05/2006 06/01/2006 06/30/2006 08/03/2006 08/31/2006 09/28/2006 11/03/2006 11/30/2006 12/28/2006 12/30/2005 02/03/2006 03/03/2006 03/31/2006 05/05/2006 06/01/2006 06/30/2006 08/03/2006 08/31/2006 09/28/2006 11/03/2006 11/30/2006 02/03/2006 03/03/2006 03/31/2006 05/05/2006 06/01/2006 06/30/2006 08/03/2006 08/31/2006 09/28/2006 11/03/2006 11/30/2006 12/28/2006 C -

21

TABLE C-X.1

SUMMARY

OF COLLECTION DATES FOR SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, 2006 AIR PARTICULATE (GAMMA SPECTROSCOPY)

SAMPLING PERIOD 1B 1z 1C 3A 5H2 JAN-MAR 12/30

- 03/31/2006 12/30 - 03/31/2006 12/30 03/31/2006 12/30 03/31/2006 01/03 - 04/03/2006 APR-JUN 03/31

- 06/30/2006 03/31

- 06/30/2006 03/31 06/30/2006 03/31 06/30/2006 03/31 - 06/30/2006 JUL-SEP 06/30 - 09/28/2006 06/30 - 09/28/2006 06130 09/28/2006 06/30 09/28/2006 07/03 - 10/02/2006 OCT-DEC 09/28 - 12/28/2006 09/28 -

12/28/2006 09/28 12/28/2006 09/28 12/28/2006 10/02 - 01/02/2007 AIR PARTICULATE (G. BETA & 1-131)

WEEK 1B 1Z iC 3A 5H2 I

2 3

4 5

6 7

8 9

10 11 12 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 ILI,1U U IIU!JI/UUO 01/06 - 01/13/2006 01/13 - 01/20/2006 01/20 - 01/27/2006 01/27 - 02/03/2006 02/03 - 02/10/2006 02/10 - 02/17/2006 02/17 - 02/24/2006 02/24

- 03/03/2006 03/03 - 03/10/2006 03/10 - 03/17/2006 03/17 - 03/24/2006

-03124 '-03/3,1/2006.

03/31 -

04/07/2006 04/07 - 04/14/2006 04/14 - 04/21/2006 04/21

- 04/28/2006 04/28 - 05/05/2006 05/05 - 05/12/2006 05/12 - 05/19/2006 05/19 - 05/26/2006 05/26 - 06/01/2006 06/01

- 06/08/2006 06/08 - 06/15/2006 06/15 - 06/23/2006 06/23 - 06/30/2006 06/30 -

07/07/2006 07/07

- 07/14/2006 07/14

- 07/20/2006 I ZI.ll 01/06 01/11 01/2 01/2 02/03 0211(

02/17 02/24 03/03 03/10 03/17 03/31 04/07 04/14 04/21 04/28 05/05 05/12 05/19 05/26 06/01 06/08 06/15 06/23 06/30 07/07 07/14 07/20 07/27 08/03 08/10 08/17 08/24 08/31 09/07 09/14 09/21 09/28 10/05 10/12 10/19 10/26 11/03 11/09 11/16 11/24 11/30 12/07 12/15 12/21 U

U IIUOIL/UU 6-01/13/2006 3 -

01/20/2006 0-01/27/2006 7-02/03/2006 3 -

02/10/2006

- 02/17/2006

- 02/24/2006 03/03/2006 3 - 03/10/2006 03/17/2006 03/24/2006

- 03/31 /2006.'

  • 04/07/2006 04/14/2006

- 04/21/2006 04/28/2006 05/05/2006 05/12/2006 05/19/2006 05/26/2006

  • 06/01/2006 06/08/2006 06/15/2006 06/23/2006 06/30/2006 07/07/2006 07/14/2006 07/20/2006

- 07/27/2006 08/03/2006 08/10/2006

- 08/17/2006 08/24/2006 08/31/2006

- 09/07/2006 09/14/2006 09/21/2006

- 09/28/2006 10/05/2006 10/12/2006 10/19/2006 10/26/2006 11/03/2006 11/09/2006 11/16/2006 11/24/2006 11/30/2006 12/07/2006 12/15/2006 12/21/2006 12/28/2006 I

I)U 01/06 01/13 01/20 01/27 02/03 02/10 02/17 02/24 03/03 03/10 03/17

ý0324_7 03/31 04/07 04/14 04/21 04/28 05/05 05/12 05/19 05/26 06/01 06/08 06/15 06/23 06/30 07/07 07/14 07/20 07/27 08/03 08/10 08/17 08/24 08/31 09/07 09/14 09/21 09/28 10/05 10/12 10/19 10/26 11/03 11/09 11/16 11/24 11/30 12/07 12115 12/21 V~UUIU/LUUU 01/13/2006 01/20/2006

- 01/27/2006 02/03/2006

- 02/10/2006

- 02/17/2006

- 02/24/2006

- 03/03/2006

- 03/10/2006

- 03/17/2006 03/24/2006

.03/31/200}.

04/07/2006 04/14/2006 04/21/2006 04/28/2006 05/05/2006 05/12/2006 05/19/2006 05/26/2006 06/01/2006 06/08/2006 06/15/2006 06/23/2006 06/30/2006 07/07/2006 07/14/2006 07/20/2006 07/27/2006 08/03/2006 08/10/2006 08/17/2006 08/24/2006 08/31/2006 09/07/2006 09/14/2006 09/21/2006 09/28/2006 10/05/2006 10/12/2006 10/19/2006 10/26/2006 11/03/2006 11/09/2006 11/16/2006 11/24/2006 11/30/2006 12/07/2006 12/15/2006 12/21/2006 12/28/2006 14L1J 01/06 01/13 01/20 01/27 02/03 02/10 02/17 02/24 03/03 03/10 03/17

,:03/24 04/07 04/14 04/21 04/28 05/05 05/12 05/19 05/26 06/01 06/08 06/15 06123 06/30 07/07 07/14 07/20 07/27 08/03 08/10 08/17 08/24 08/31 09/07 09/14 09/21 09/28 10/05 10/12 10/19 10/26 11/03 11/09 11/16 11/24 11/30 12/07 12/15 12/21 U

UIIUO(zUUo 01/13/2006 01/20/2006 01/27/2006 02/03/2006 02/10/2006 02/17/2006 02/24/2006 03/03/2006 03/10/2006 03/17/2006 03/24/2006 03/31'/2006.

04, /07/2066 04/14/2006 04/21/2006 04/28/2006 05/05/2006 05/12/2006 05/19/2006 05/26/2006 06/01/2006 06/08/2006 06/1512006 06/23/2006 06/30/2006 07/07/2006 07/14/2006 07/20/2006 07/27/2006 08/03/2006 08/10/2006 08/17/2006 08/24/2006 08/31/2006 09/07/2006 09/14/2006 09/21/2006 09/28/2006 10/05/2006 10/12/2006 10/19/2006 10/26/2006 11/03/2006 11/09/2006 11/16/2006 11/24/2006 11/30/2006 12/07/2006 12/15/2006 12/21/2006 12/28/2006 U IIU0 01/09 01/17 01/24 01/30 02/06 02/13 02/21 02/27 03/06 03/13 03/20

'.T -03127_

04/10 04/17 04/24 05/01 05/09 05/15 05/22 05/30 06/05 06/12 06/19 06/26 07/03 07/10 07/17 07/24 07/31 08/08 08/14 08/21 08/28 09/05 09/12 09/18 09/25 10/02 10/09 10/16 10/23 10/30 11/06 11/13 11/20 11/27 12/04 12/11 12/18 12/26 0/-

UI9U/20LUU

- 01/17/2006

- 01/24/2006

- 01/30/2006

- 02/06/2006

- 02/13/2006

- 02/21/2006

- 02/27/2006

- 03/06/2006

- 03/13/2006

- 03/20/2006

- 03/27/2006

_:i--04/03/2006-

- 04/17/2006

- 04/24/2006

- 05/01/2006

- 05/09/2006

- 05/15/2006

- 05/22/2006

- 05/30/2006

- 06/05/2006

- 06/12/2006

- 06/19/2006

- 06/26/2006

- 07/03/2006

- 07/10/2006

- 07/17/2006

- 07/24/2006

- 07/31/2006

- 08/08/2006

- 08/14/2006

- 08/21/2006

- 08/28/2006

- 09/05/2006

- 09/12/2006

- 09/18/2006

- 09/25/2006 10/02/2006 10/09/2006 10/16/2006 10/23/2006 10/30/2006

- 11/06/2006

- 11/13/2006

- 11/20/2006

- 11/27/2006

- 12/04/2006

- 12/11/2006

- 12/18/2006

- 12/26/2006

- 01/02/2007 07/20 07/27 08/03 08/10 08/17 08/24 08/31 09/07 09/14 09/21 09/28 10/05 10/12 10/19 10/26 11/03 11/09 11/16 11/24 11/30 12/07 12/15 12/21 07/27/2006 08/03/2006 08/10/2006 08/17/2006 08/24/2006 08/31/2006 09/07/2006 09/14/2006 09/21/2006 09/28/2006 10/05/2006 10/12/2006 10/19/2006 10/26/2006 11/03/2006 11/09/2006 11/16/2006 11/24/2006 11/30/2006 12/07/2006 12/15/2006 12/21/2006 12/28/2006 C -

22

TABLE C-X.1

SUMMARY

OF COLLECTION DATES FOR SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, 2006 TLD STATION CODE=

JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC CODE JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC 1A lB ic 1D 1E IF 1G 1H 11 1J 1K 1L iM ip 1Q 21 3A 4K 5

1NN 6B 14 15 16 17 18 19 22 23 24 26 27 31A 32 40 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 01/06/2006 - 03/31/2006 03/31/2006 - 06/30/2006 01/06/2006 - 03/31/2006 03/31/2006 - 06/30/2006 01/06/2006 - 03/31/2006 03/31/2006 - 06/30/2006 01/06/2006 - 03/31/2006 03/31/2006 - 06/30/2006 01/05/2006 - 03/30/2006 03/30/2006 - 06/29/2006 01/05/2006 - 03/30/2006 03/30/2006 - 06/29/2006 01/05/2006 - 03/30/2006 03/30/2006 - 06/29/2006 01/06/2006 - 03/31/2006 03/31/2006 - 06/30/2006 01/06/2006 - 03/31/2006 03/31/2006 - 06/29/2006 01/05/2006 - 03/30/2006 03/30/2006 - 06/29/2006 01/05/2006 03/31/2006 03/31/2006 06/30/2006 01/06/2006 - 03/31/2006 03/31/2006 - 06/30/2006 01/06/2006 - 03/31/2006 03/31/2006 - 06/30/2006 01/06/2006 - 03/31/2006 03/31/2006 - 06/30/2006 01/06/2006 - 03/31/2006 03/31/2006 - 06/30/2006

,-._I701/06/2OO06.:-',:Z03/31/2006-,:*,* -03/31/2006-.--06/30/2006-01/05/2006: -03/30/2056 03/30/2006

- 06/29/2006 01/06/2006 - 03/31/2006 03/31/2006 - 06/30/2006 01/06/2006 - 03/31/2006 03/31/2006 - 06/30/2006 01/06/2006 - 03/31/2006 03/31/2006 - 06/30/2006 01/06/2006 - 03/31/2006 03/31/2006 - 06/30/2006 01/06/2006 - 03/31/2006 03/31/2006 - 06/30/2006 01/06/2006 - 03/31/2006 03/31/2006 - 06/30/2006 01/04/2006 - 03/31/2006 03/31/2006 - 06/28/2006 01/04/2006 - 03/29/2006 03/29/2006 - 06/28/2006 01/04/2006 - 03/31/2006 03/31/2006 - 06/30/2006 01/04/2006 - 03/31/2006 03/31/2006 - 06/28/2006 01/04/2006 - 03/31/2006 03/31/2006 - 06/30/2006 01/04/2006 - 03/31/2006 03/31/2006 - 06/30/2006 01/04/2006 - 03/29/2006 03/29/2006 - 06/28/2006 01/05/2006 - 03/31/2006 03/31/2006 - 06/29/2006 01/05/2006 - 03/31/2006 03/31/2006 - 06/30/2006 01/05/2006 - 03/31/2006 03/31/2006 - 06/30/2006 01/05/2006 - 03/31/2006 03/31/2006 - 06/28/2006 01/05/2006 - 03/31/2006 03/31/2006 - 06/28/2006 01/05/2006 - 03/29/2006 03/29/2006 - 06/28/2006 01/05/2006 - 03/30/2006 03/30/2006 - 06/29/2006 01/04/2006 - 03/31/2006 03/31/2006 - 06/30/2006 01/04/2006 - 03/31/2006 03/31/2006 - 06/30/2006 01/04/2006 - 03/29/2006 03/29/2006 - 06/28/2006 01/04/2006 - 03/29/2006 03/29/2006 - 06/28/2006 01/04/2006 - 03/29/2006 03/29/2006 - 06/30/2006 01/04/2006 - 03/29/2006 03/29/2006 - 06/30/2006 01/04/2006 - 03/29/2006 03/29/2006 - 06/28/2006 01/04/2006 - 03/29/2006 03/29/2006 - 06/28/2006 01/04/2006 03/29/2006 03/29/2006 - 06/28/2006 01/04/2006

- 03/29/2006 03/29/2006 - 06/28/2006 06/30/2006 06/30/2006 06/30/2006 06/30/2006 06/29/2006 06/29/2006 06/29/2006 06/30/2006 06/29/2006 06/29/2006 06/30/2006 06/30/2006 06/30/2006 06/30/2006 06/30/2006

- _06/30/2006--

06/29/2006' _

06/30/2006 06/30/2006 06/30/2006 06/30/2006 06/30/2006 06/30/2006 06/28/2006 06/28/2006 06/30/2006 06/28/2006 06/30/2006 06/30/2006 06/28/2006 06/29/2006 06/30/2006 06/30/2006 06/28/2006 06/28/2006 06/28/2006 06/29/2006 06/30/2006 -

06/30/2006 -

06/28/2006 -

06/28/2006 -

06/30/2006 -

06/30/2006 -

06/28/2006 -

06/28/2006 -

06/28/2006 -

06/28/2006 -

U09l/22UUO

- 09/28/2006

- 09/28/2006

- 09/28/2006

- 09/29/2006 09/29/2006 09/29/2006 09/28/2006 09/28/2006 09/29/2006 09/28/2006 09/28/2006 09/28/2006 09/28/2006 09/28/2006 09/28/2006-...

06929/2806 09/28/2006 09/28/2006 09/28/2006 09/28/2006 09/28/2006 09/28/2006 09/29/2006 09/29/2006 09/28/2006 09/29/2006 09/28/2006 09/28/2006 09/29/2006 09/29/2006 09/28/2006 09/28/2006 09/29/2006 09/29/2006 09/29/2006 09/29/2006 09/28/2006 09/28/2006 09/29/2006 09/29/2006 09/28/2006 09/28/2006 09/29/2006 09/29/2006 09/29/2006 09/28/2006 uWl0o/zuuo 09/28/2006 09/28/2006 09/28/2006 09/29/2006 09/29/2006 09/29/2006 09/28/2006 09/28/2006 09/29/2006 09/28/2006 09/28/2006 09/28/2006 09/28/2006 09/28/2006

-09/28/2006._

0 09/29/20066'"-*

09/28/2006 09/28/2006 09/28/2006 09/28/2006 09/28/2006 09/28/2006 09/29/2006 09/29/2006 09/28/2006 09/29/2006 09/28/2006 09/28/2006 09/29/2006 09/29/2006 09/28/2006 09/28/2006 09/29/2006 09/29/2006 09/29/2006 09/29/2006 09/28/2006 09/28/2006 09/29/2006 09/29/2006 09/28/2006 09/28/2006 -

09/29/2006 09/29/2006 09/29/2006 09/28/2006-01/04/2007 01/04/2007 01/04/2007 01/04/2007 01/04/2007 01/05/2007 01/04/2007 01/04/2007 01/04/2007 01/05/2007 01/04/2007 01/04/2007 01/04/2007 01/04/2007 01/04/2007

--01/04/2007..

0I/05/2007 01/04/2007 01/04/2007 01/04/2007 01/04/2007 01/04/2007 01/04/2007 01/05/2007 01/05/2007 01/04/2007 01/05/2007 01/04/2007 01/04/2007 01/05/2007 01/05/2007 01/04/2007 01/04/2007 01/04/2007 01/05/2007 01/05/2007 01/05/2007 01/04/2007 01/04/2007 01/05/2007 01105/2007 01/04/2007 01/04/2007 01/05/2007 01/05/2007 01/05/2007 01/04/2007 C -

23

Intentionally left blank

FIGURE C-1 MONTHLY TOTAL GROSS BETA CONCENTRATIONS IN DRINKING WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICITY OF PBAPS, 2006 6

41 a)

CONTROL-61 INDICATOR - 4L

.I I

It~

2 n'

p U

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUGj MONTH SEP OCT NOV DEC PBAPS changed to total gross beta at the beginning of 2005.

Previous data included summation of less than values.

FIGURE C-2 i MEAN ANNUAL CS-137 CONCENTRATIONS IN FISH SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF PBAPS, 1971 - 2006 1000 I

750 D.6E 0)

Il 500 I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I i

I IlIlill II I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

[

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

.111, I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I~ lI I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

-*--------I--I--t-i I

I 1111 II,,

I I

I I

I I

I I

1111111 I

I I

I I

I I

I I t I

I I

I I

I I

I b1#II I

I I

I I

I I

111111 I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I 111111 I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I

-+

-l---V

-+

  • --,---I----I--4--

111111 I

I I

I I

I I

11>11 I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I1~II I

I I

111111.

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I~tII I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I F

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

~

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I

  • l~

v~t VL.

U

~2~It II 1

L I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

i I

I I

I I

I I

I I i I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

11111 II~I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I]

I I

I I

I I

~

~I I

- I I

I I

I I

4-I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

-I------

+ -

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

U A

1 -

S -

2 -

r r,

r I

I I

I I

I CONTROL INDICATOR 250 ft I

I 0

71 73 75'7779 81 83 85 8789 91A93 95 9799 01 0305 07 YEAR I;;{

FIGURE C-3 CONCENTRATIONS OF CS-137 IN SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF PBApS, 1971 - 2006 A

2000, i

i I

I I

I I

I I

  • t I

[

'4 D (IN I I

I I

I I

I I

1750

- -4J- (IN[

-x-4T (INI 6F (C(

I I

I I

I 1

1250 E

i i

I i

i I I

I I

i I

I IiI I

I III I

I I

i I

Ii II' 1000 7 5 0

-* T I

I I

I I

I I

I t

I}

I I

II II I

I I

I 0,

I l

i 1

1 1

1 1

1 I

I1 I

I I

I I

i i

I I

I I

I I

I I

i I

I 250 I'

I I

0 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 No sample collected from Station 4J in 1990 and Station 4D discontinued beginning 1991

FIGURE C-4 MEAN WEEKLY GROSS BETA CONCENTRATIONS IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF PBAPS, 2006 60__

S -i-GROUP I GROUP II 50 50

  • GROUP III

~40 E

A.).

=30 10 o

I I

I 1

5 9

13 17 21 25 29 33 37 WEEK NO.

41 45 49

FIGURE C-5 MEAN MONTHLY GROSS BETA CONCENTRATIONS IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF,, PBAPS, 1970 - 2006 1000 100 E

.0 10 I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I i

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

i I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I C

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

111111, I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

i I

I I

I I

I I

I~If

-ALLSTATIONS I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I

' I l I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I r

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

]

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

41 I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I 4

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

t I

I I

I I

I I

I 1

I I

I I

I I

I I

I l

l l

l l

70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92,,"01 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 Year (It

FIGURE C-6 MEAN ANNUAL CS-137 CONCENTRATIONS IN MILK SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF PBAPS, 1971 - 2006 zu 15 1

i I

I I 10 i-I I

DISTANT FARMS I

~

INT~ERMEDIATE FARMS NE~RBY FARMS I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I

  • I,~r I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I.

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

III"

I I

I I

I I

I I

I~ *I..

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I r

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I.

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I

[

i I

I I

I C.).

CL 5

-I--

-I I

0

-5 IJ L

LL L

LLI*

I YA Ie S

swi I

< RAMA Ii I

I i

I I

I I

I i

I I

I I*

i I

I YEAR I" I I

I I YEARNote:

Second half of 2000 switched to Intermediate Farms Discontinued from 1995 - 1999 nepo nII wy enIfl no aC UdLIVILYwa deetdbULLU.

FIGURE C-7 MEAN QUARTERLY AMBIENT GAMMA RADIATION LEVELS (TLD)

IN THE VICINITY OF PBAPS, 1973 - 2006 10 I

I I

I

]

I I

II1

-'--SITE BOUNDRY 9

INTERMIIED I

I I

iI (J)

I I

I I

I I

I I

I IiI I

CONTROL III I

I E

I I

i I

I I

I I

i I

I I

I

~

I I

I II I

I I

'I I

I I

I I

I i

I I

I I

I I

I II I

I j k I

II I

I I

73 75 77 79 81 83 85 87 89 91 93!i*95 97 99 01 03 05 07 YEAR itt

FIGURE C-8 QUARTERLY AMBIENT GAMMA RADIATION LEVELS (TLD)

NEAR THE INDEPENDENT SPENT FUEL STORAGE INSTALLATION LOCATED AT PBAPS, 1998 - 2006 10 I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

II I

II I

I I

Ii I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I II I

I I

I I

I' I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

8 1

.6-UIQ S----

2B


-ontro-s

.6-I 0)t 0

I I

I I

I I

I.

-F-YEARISfactivated June 20

APPENDIX D DATA TABLES AND FIGURES COMPARISON LABORATORY

The following section contains data and figures illustrating the analyses performed by the QC laboratory, Environmental, Inc. Duplicate samples were obtained from several locations and media and split between the primary laboratory, Teledyne Brown Engineering (TBE) and the QC laboratory. Comparison of the results for most media were within expected ranges.

The QC laboratory results for gross beta insoluble and soluble in drinking water samples were very similar to those reported by the Primary laboratory. All results between the laboratories were within 4 pCi/I of each other. The data reported were well within the historical range.

D-1

TABLE D-I.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS BETA INSOLUBLE IN DRINKING WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, 2006 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION 4L PERIOD JAN

< 1.9 FEB

< 1.9 MAR

< 1.7 APR

< 1.9 MAY

< 2.1 JUN

< 1.9 JUL

< 1.9 AUG

< 1.9 SEP

< 2.1 OCT

< 1.9 NOV

< 1.8

. DEC

< 1.9 "I

.n MEAN 1.9 - 0.2 TABLE D-I.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS BETA SOLUBLE IN DRINKING WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, 2006 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/-2 SIGMA COLLECTION 4L PERIOD JAN

< 1.7 FEB

< 1.8 MAR

< 1.9 APR

< 1.8 MAY

< 0.8 JUN

< 1.6 JUL

< 1.8 AUG

< 1.7 SEP

< 1.8 OCT

< 1.7 NOV

< 0.9 DEC

< 1.8 MEAN 1.6 +/- 0.7 D-2

CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN DRINKING WATER, SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATIOIN, 2006 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA TABLE D-1.3 STC COLLECTION PERIOD 4L JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC MEAN Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Zr-95 t:, iNb-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140

<2

<4

< 2.4

< 1.7

<2

< 2.6

< 5.2

< 4.2

< 3.4

< 2.7

< 2.6

< 2.6

<2

<4

  • 2.4
  • 2.8

< 1.6

  • 2.7

< 2.6

  • 3.6
  • 2.2

< 3.1

<2

< 1.4

<7

<9

< 10

< 8.5

< 6.3

< 4.6

  • 7.2
  • 12
  • 6.4

< 4.9

< 7.8

< 5.9

<3

<4

< 3.6

< 1.4

  • 2.5
  • 1.4
  • 3.2
  • 4.4

< 1.9

  • 3.2

< 3.1

< 2.6

<4

< 11

< 5.2

  • 5.3

<4

  • 2.2
  • 5.2
  • 7.2

< 3.6

  • 2.3

< 5.1

< 4.7

< Z

<7

< 5.3

< 3.5

<4

< 2.7

< 5.3

< 10

< 4.6

<6

<3

< 3.9 3

5 1.9 2.6 3

3.5 2.7 4.1 2.6 2.9 1.4 3.4 I

<2

<5 4 3.6

< 2.7

  • 2.9

< 3.7

  • 4.7

< 5.5

  • 4.8
  • 2.9
  • 3.8
  • 2.6

<3

<7

  • 2.4
  • 3.1 42.3
  • 2.6
  • 4.8

< 5.4

  • 2.7

<4

  • 2.5

< 3.3

  • 14

< 24

  • 12
  • 14
  • 14
  • 15
  • 21

< 24

  • 15

< 15

  • 14
  • 12

<2

<3

< 4.8

<2

< 3.2

< 2.3

< 4.8

< 3.3

< 2.3

< 3.5

< 2.1

< 2.4 3+/-2 3+/-1 7+/-4 3+/-2 5+/-5 5+/-4

+/-2 4+/-2 4+/-3 16+/-9 3+/-2 I'.

I.

H

TABLE D-II.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS BETA INSOLUBLE IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, 2006 RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER +/-2 SIGMA COLLECTION IA PERIOD 1

19+/-4 2

24+/-5 3

14+/-4 4

19+/-4 5

22++/- 5 6

19+/--4 7

25+/--5 8

31 +/--5 9

23+/--4 10 17 +/- 4 11 27 +/- 5 12 21 +/- 4 13 20 +/- 5 14 17 +/- 4 15 26 +/- 5 16 14 +/- 4 18 21 +/- 5 19 19 +/- 4 20 12 +/- 4 21 17 +/- 4 22 40 +/- 6 23 14 +/- 4 24 14 +/- 4 25 24 +/- 4 26 12 +/- 4 27 31 +/- 5 28 24 +/- 4 29 31 +/- 5 30 31 +/- 5 31 43 +/- 5 32 27 +/- 4 33 21 +/- 4 34 24 +/- 5 35 29 +/- 4 36 16 +/- 4 37 25 +/- 4 38 16 +/- 4 39 37 +/- 5 40 27 +/- 4 41 22 +/- 4 42 23 +/- 4 43 16 +/- 4 44 25 +/- 4 45 26 +/- 5 46 22 +/- 4 47 19 +/- 4 48 36 +/- 6 49 35 +/- 5 50 36 +/- 4 51 33 +/- 5 52 23 +/- 4 MEAN 23 +/- 15 D-4

TABLE D-II.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, 2006 RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION PERIOD 1A 12/30 - 03/31/06 04/01 - 06/27/05 07/01 - 09/30/05 09/30 - 12/30/05 Be-7 Mn-54 Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 65 +/- 13.8 97 +/- 18.1 91 +/- 15 64 +/- 15.4

< 0.9

< 0.5

< 0.7

  • 0.5

< 0.4

< 1.0

  • 0.5
  • 0.9
  • 0.8

< 0.7

< 1.0

< 1.1

< 0.6

< 0.7

< 0.5

  • 0.6

< 0.6

< 0.6

  • 0.6
  • 0.4 MEAN 79 +/- 35 0.7 +/- 0.4 0.7 +/- 0.6 0.9 +/- 0.4 0.6 +/- 0.2 0.6 +/- 0.2 D-5

TABLE D-Ill.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF 1-131 BY CHEMICAL SEPARATION AND GAMMA EMITTERS IN MILK SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, 2006 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION PERIOD 1-131 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 J

02/13/06 05/22/05 08/01/05 11/06/05 MEAN 0

02/13/06 05/22/05 08/01/05 11/06/05

< 0.3

< 0.1

< 0.4

< 0.4 1328 +/- 103

< 3 1401 +/- 111

< 2 1300 +/- 109

< 3 1497 +/- 119

< 4

<4

<4

<3

<3

< 21

<9

< 10

< 15

<2

<2

<3

<2 0.30 +/- 0.28 1381 +/- 176 3+/-1 3+/-1 14 +/- 11 2+/-1

< 0.4

< 0.2

< 0.3

< 0.3 1279 +/- 106

< 4 1240 +/- 91

< 2 1438 +/-127

< 5 1220 +/-113

< 4

<3

<2

<3

<4

< 14

< 14

< 13

< 18

<3

<2

<4

<5 MEAN 0.30 +/-0.16 1295 198 4+/- 3 T

02/14/06

< 0.3 1285 +/- 123

< 2 02/13/06

< 0.3 1187 +/- 119

< 5 05/22/05

< 0.4 1249 +/- 182

< 4 08/01/05

< 0.4 1295 +/- 121

< 3 3 +/- -

3

<2

<3

<7

<4 15+/-4.

. 3+2 _

<25

<3

<17

<3

< 25

< 17

<4

<3 MEAN 0.35 +/- 0.12 1254 +/- 98 4+/-2 4+/-4 21 +/- 9 4+/-1 D-6

TABLE D-IV.1

SUMMARY

OF COLLECTION DATES FOR SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, 2006 DRINKING WATER (GROSS BETA & GAMMA SPECTROSCOPY)

COLLECTION PERIOD JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC AIR PARTICULATE 4L 12/30/05-02/03/06 02/03/06

- 03/03/06 03/03/06

- 03/31/06 03/31/06 - 05/05/06 05/06/06 - 06/01/01 06/01/06 - 06/30/06 06/30/06 - 08/03/06 08/03/06

- 08/31/06 08/31/06

- 09/28/06 09/28/06

- 11/03/06 11/03/06 - 11/30/06 11/30/06 - 12/28/06 IGAMMA SPECTROSCOPY) t.......................

i COLLECTION~

PERIOD JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC 1A 12/30/05 - 03/31/06 03/31/06 - 06/30/06 06/30/06 - 09/28/06 09/28/06 - 12/28/06 AIR PARTICULATE (GROSS BETA)

COLLECTION PERIOD COLLECTION PERIOD 1A 1A 1

2 3

4 5

6 7

8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 12/30/05 01/06/06 01/13/06 01/20/06 01/27/06 02/03/06 02/10/06 02/17/06 02/24/06 03/03/06 03/10/06 03/17/06 03/24/06 03/31/06 04/07/06 04/14/06 04/21/06 04/28/06 05/05/06 05/12/06 05/19/06 05/26/06 06/01/07 06/08/07 06/15/07 06/23/06

- 01/06/06

- 01/13/06

- 01/20/06 01/27/06

- 02/03/06

- 02/10/06

- 02/17/06

- 02/24/06

- 03/03/06

- 03/10/06

- 03/17/06

- 03/24/06

- 03/31/06

- 04/07/06

- 04/14/06

- 04/21/06

- 04/28/06

- 05/05/06

- 05/12/06

- 05/19/06

- 05/26/06

- 06/01/07

- 06/08/07

- 06/15/07

- 06/23/07

- 06/30/07 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 06/30/06 07/07/06 07/14/06 07/20/06 07/27/06 08/03/06 08/10/06 08/17/06 08/24/06 08/31/06 09/07/06 09/14/06 09/21/06 09/28/06 10/05/06 10/12/06 10/19/06 10/26/06 11/03/06 11/09/06 11/16/06 11/24/06 12/01/06 12/07/06 12/15/06 12/21/06

- 07/07/06

- 07/14/06

- 07/20/06

- 07/27/06

- 08/03/06

- 08/10/06

- 08/17/06

- 08/24/06

- 08/31/06

- 09/07/06

- 09/14/06

- 09/21/06

- 09/28/06

- 10/05/06

- 10/12/06

- 10/19/06

- 10/26/06

- 11/03/06

- 11/09/06

- 11/16/06

- 11/24/06

- 12/01/06

- 12/07/09

- 12/15/06

- 12/21/06

- 12/28/06 D-7

FIGURE D-1 COMPARISON OF MONTHLY TOTAL GROSS BETA CONCENTRATIONS IN DRINKING WATER SAMPLES SPLIT BETWEEN THE PRIMARY AND QC LABORATdRIES, 2006 b

5 4

~1~

L).

0. 3 00 I/

-~~ ~

~ ~

1 2

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I

-I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY ENVIRONMENTAL INC. SOLUBLE AND INSOLUBLE FRACTIONS WERE COMBINED FOR TOTAL GROSS BETA COMPARISON.

JUN JUL -!-IJAUG SEP OCT NOV DEC MONTH I*.:-, : 1

  • ,r,,

FIGURE D-2 COMPARISON OF WEEKLY GROSS BETA CO NCENTRATIONS FROM COLLOCATED AIR PARTICULATE LOCATIO,,NS SPLIT BETWEEN THE PRIMARY AND QC LABORAT RIES, 2006 50 I

  • > QCLAB PRIMARY LAB I..I II I

I I

I' l I, I

  • II?

II

=

TI \\

0)

C.A).

20 I

I I

r I...

I I

/

\\I*

I II I

I*I IV i

i I1I i

iI iI

-I II II I

I I

1 I

i II I

Iu IJ 37 41 45 49 WEEK NO.

APPENDIX E INTER-LABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM

TABLE E-1 T ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2006 (PAGE 1 OF 3)

Identification Reported Known Ratio (c)

Month/Year Number Matrix Nuclide Units Value (a)

Value (b)

TBE/Analytics Evaluation (d)

March 2006 E4964-396 Milk E4965-396 Milk E4967-396 AP Sr-89 Sr-90 1-131 Ce-141 Cr-51 Cs-1 34 Cs-137 Co-58 Mn-54 Fe-59 Zn-65 Co-60 Ce-141 Cs-1 34 Cs-1 37 Co-58 Mn-54 Fe-59 Zn-65 Co-60 pCi/L 91.5 pCi/L 12.2 pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L p_ i pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi 74.4 95.1 278 103 87.6 93.9 90.0 83.0 178 118 89.9 71.5 67.5 79.7 74.9 75.5 146 91.2 99.2 10.8 78.0 104 280 121 88.8 105 93.3 86.6 176 128 74 86.1 63.3 74.6 67 61.8 126 91 86.2 E4966-396 Charcoal 1-131 pCi 87.4 pCi/L 118 pCi/L 9.29 0.92 1.13 0.95 0.91 0.99 0.85 0.99 0.89 0.96 0.96 1.01 0.92 1.21 0.83 1.07 1.07 1.12 1.22 1.16 1.00 1.01 0.91 0.95 0.79 0.95 1.03 0.88 0.99 1.01 0.98 1.03 0.98 0.98 0.91 1.01 0.75 0.97 0.94 1.04 1.03 1.05 0.94 0.99 A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A W

A A

A A

W A

A A

June 2006 E5018-396 Milk Sr-89 Sr-90 E5019-396 Milk 1-131 Ce-141 Cr-51 Cs-1 34 Cs-1 37 Co-58 Mn-54 Fe-59 Zn-65 Co-60 E5021-396 AP Ce-141 Cr-51 Cs-134 Cs-137 Co-58 Mn-54 Fe-59 Zn-65 Co-60 E5020-396 Charcoal 1-131 pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi 49.9 174 266 111 116 101 144 96.7 182 126 113 176 63.7 76.8 63.1 102 64.6 131 81.6 65.4 129 9.74 63.2 184 259 127 117 100 146 93.6 185 129 124 174 85.1 79.0 67.4 99 62.9 125 86.5 65.9 A

A W

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A W

A A

A A

A A

A E-1

TABLE E-1 ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2006 (PAGE 2 OF 3)

Identification Reported Known Ratio (c)

Month/Year Number Matrix Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (b)

TBE/Analytics Evaluation (d)

September 2006 E5120-396 Milk E5121-396 Milk Sr-89 Sr-90 1-131 Ce-141 Cr-51 Cs-134 Cs-1 37 Co-58 Mn-54 Fe-59 Zn-65 Co-60 pCi/L 90.3 pCi/L 11.6 pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L 67.8 85.0 263 74.7 172 107 110 46.6 144 127 E5123-396 AP Ce-141 Cs-134 Cs-137 Co-58 Mn-54 Fe-59 Zn-65 Co-60 Co-57 p cI pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi 67.1 51.7 134 84.8 95.2 41.6 123 98.9 0.922 89.2 12.4 73.8 86.0 282 85.0 175 109 113 43.7 145 134 66.4 65.6 135.0 84.3 87 33.7 112 103 (1) 90.7 72.0 5.90 70.8 294 433 147 237 83.8 111 79.7 164 281 210 309 105 169.0 59.7 79 56.7 117 200 1.01 0.94 0.92 0.99 0.93 0.88 0.98 0.98 0.98 1.07 0.99 0.95 1.01 0.79 0.99 1.01 1.10 1.23 1.10 0.96 NA 0.86 1.01 1.19 1.02 0.91 0.97 0.87 0.97 0.98 1.02 1.00 1.04 0.94 1.05 1.11 0.86 1.09 1.09 1.15 1.25 1.16 1.04 A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

W A

A A

W A

A NA E5122-396 Charcoal 1-131 pCi 77.7 pCi/L 72.4 pCi/L 7.05 December 2006 E5172-396 Milk E5173-396 Milk E5175-396 AP Sr-89 Sr-90 1-131 Ce-141 Cr-51 Cs-1 34 Cs-137 Co-58 Mn-54 Fe-59 Zn-65 Co-60 Ce-141 Cr-51 Cs-1 34 Cs-1 37 Co-58 Mn-54 Fe-59 Zn-65 Co-60 pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi 71.9 268 420 128 231 82.0 113 79.8 170 265 220 343 90.8 185 65.0 90.6 70.7 136 208 A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

W A

A E-2

TABLE E-1 ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2006 (PAGE 3 OF 3)

Identification Reported Known Ratio (c)

Month/Year Number Matrix Nuclide Units Value (a)

Value (b)

TBE/Analytics Evaluation (d)

December 2006 E5174-396 Charcoal 1-131 pCi 77.4 85.4 0.91 A

(1)

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Impurity detected but not measured by Analytics.

Teledyne Brown Engineering reported result.

The Analytics known value is equal to 100% of the parameter present in the standard as determined by gravimetric and/or volumetric measurements made during standard preparation.

Ratio of Teledyne Brown Engineering to Analytics results.

Analytics evaluation based on TBE internal QC limits: A= Acceptable. Reported result falls within ratio limits of 0.80-1.20.

W-Acceptable with warning. Reported result falls within 0.70-0.80 or 1.20-1.30. N = Not Acceptable. Reported result falls outside the ratio limits of < 0. 70 and > 1.30.

E-3

TABLE E-2 ERA ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2006 (PAGE 1 OF 1)

Identification Reported Known MonthlYear Number Media Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (b)

Control Limits Evaluation (c)

May 2006 Rad 65 Water Sr-89 Sr-90 Ba-i 33 Cs-134 Cs-137 Co-60 Zn-65 Gr-A Gr-B Ra-226 U-Nat H-3 Rad 65 Water 1-131 pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCiIL pCi/L pCi/L pCilL pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L 30.2 8.74 10.9 39.7 199 111 146 22.9 23.7 2.64 74.9 7950 18.2 16.2 65.0 27.4 74.4 61.6 277 23.3 22.0 3.18 2930 32.4 9.00 10.0 43.4 214 113.0 152 21.3 23.0 3.02 69.1 8130 23.6-41.1 0.340- 17.7 1.34-18.7 34.7-52.1 195 - 233 103-123 126-178 12.1 -30.5 14.3-31.7 2.23 - 3.81 57.1 -81.1 6720 - 9540 13.9-24.3 A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A*,

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

19.1 Novembr~bVb Ra dý6 7 Water Sr-89 Sr-90 Ba-133 Cs-134 Cs-1 37 Co-60 Zn-65 Gr-A Gr-B U-Nat H-3 Water 1-131

-: Y,3 9.9 -

16.0 70.2 29.9 78.2 62.3 277 28.7 20.9 3.20 3050 31*2:--

8*6486 7'6 7.34-24.7 58.1 -82.3 21.2-38.6 69.5 - 86.9 53.6-71.0 229 - 325 16.3 -41.1 12.2-29.6 0.00 - 8.40 2430 - 3670 19.8 22.1 16.9-27.3 A

(a) Teledyne Brown Engineering reported result.

(b) The ERA known value is equal to 100% of the parameter present in the standard as determined by gravimetric and/or volumetric measurements made during standard preparation.

(c) ERA evaluation: A=acceptable. Reported result falls within the Warning Limits. NA=not acceptable. Reported result falls outside of the Control Limits. CE=check for Error. Reported result falls within the Control Limits and outside of the Warning Limit.

E-4

TABLE E-3 DOE'S MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP)

TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2006 (PAGE 1 OF 3)

Identification Reported Known Acceptance Month/Year Number Media Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (b)

Range Evaluation (c)

January 2006 06-MaW15 Water Am-241 Cs-1 34 Cs-1 37 Co-57 Co-60 H-3 Fe-55 Mn-54 Ni-63 Pu-238 Pu-239/240 Sr-90 Tc-99 U-234/233

.U-238

-Zn6 06-GrWl 5 Water Gr-A Gr-B Bq/L Bq/L Bq/L Bq/L Bq/L Bq/L Bq/L Bq/L Bq/L Bq/L Bq/L Bq/L Bq/L Bq/L Bq,

~B IL~

1.29 79.2

-0.188 151 141 988 106.0 297 61.5 0.961 0.00965 12.6 22.5 2.20 2.23 1.30 95.1 0.91 -1.69 66.57 - 123.63 166.12 116.28-215.96 153.50 107.45-199.55 952.01 666.41 - 1237.61 129.60 90.72 - 168.48 315.00 220.50-409.50 60.34 44.24-78.44 0.91 0.64-1.18 0.00710 (1) 13.16 9.21-17.11 23.38 16.37 - 30.39 2.09 1.46 - 2.72 2.17 1.52-2.82 A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

Bq/L Bq/L 0.575 0.581 1.52 1.13

>0.0 - 1.162 0.56-1.70 A

A 06-MaS15 Soil Am-241 Cs-1 34 Cs-1 37 Co-57 Co-60 Mn-54 Ni-63 K-40 Sr-90 Tc-99 Zn-65 Bq/kg Bq/kg Bq/kg Bq/kg Bq/kg Bq/kg Bq/kg Bq/kg Bq/kg Bq/kg Bq/kg Bq/sample Bq/sample Bq/sample Bq/sample Bq/sample Bq/sample Bq/sample Bq/sample Bq/sample Bq/sample Bq/sample Bq/sample 48.8 15.9 370 667 478 384 394 667 253 146 740 0.0850 2.34 2.45 3.87 2.12 0.0206 0.0766 0.00520 0.761 0.0217 0.0220 3.86 57.08 39.96 - 74.20 06-RdF15 AP Am-241 Cs-134 Cs-137 Co-57 Co-60 Mn-54 Pu-238 Pu-239/240 Sr-90 U-234/233 U-238 Zn-65 06-GrF15 AP Gr-A Gr-B 339.69 656.29 447.10 346.77 323.51 604 314.35 154.76 657.36 0.093 2.934 2.531 4.096 2.186 0.067 0.00041 0.792 0.020 0.021 3.423 237.78-441.60 459.40-853.18 312.97-581.23 242,74-450.80 226.46 - 420.56 423-785 220.04 - 408.66 108.33-201.19 460.15-854.57 0.065 - 0.121 2.054 - 3.814 1.772 - 3.290 2.867 - 5.325 1.530 - 2.842 0.047 - 0.087 (1) 0.554 - 1.030 0.014 - 0.026 0.015 - 0.027 2.396 - 4.450 A

N (1)

A A

A A

W A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A Bq/sample 0.257 Bq/sample 0.398 0.361

>0.0 - 0.722 0.481 0.241 - 0.722 A

A E-5

TABLE E-3 DOE'S MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP)

TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2006 (PAGE 2 OF 3)

Identification Reported Known Acceptance Month/Year Number Media Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (b)

Range Eyaluation (c)

January 2006 July 2006 06-RdV1 5 Vegetation Am-241 Cs-1 34 Cs-137 Co-57 Co-60 Mn-54 Pu-238 Pu-239/240 Sr-90 U-234/233 U-238 Zn-65 06-MaW16 Water Am-241

.Cs-_134_...

Co-57 Co-60 H-3 Fe-55 Ni-63 Pu-238 Pu-239/240 Sr-90 Tc-99 U-234/233 U-238

- Zn-65 06-GrW1 6 Water Gr-A Gr-B Bq/sample Bq/sample Bq/sample Bq/sample Bq/sample Bq/sample Bq/sample Bq/sample Bq/sample Bq/sample Bq/sample Bq/sample 0.156 0.369 3.15 10.1 4.69 6.53 0.183 0.111 2.22 0.208 0.176 10.5 3.074 8.578 4.520 6.247 0.137 0.164 1.561 0.208 0.216 9.798 Bq/L Bq/L.

Bq/L Bq/L Bq/L Bq/L Bq/L Bq/L Bq/L Bq/L Bq/L Bq/L Bq/L Bq/L 0.156 0.109- 0.203 06-MaS16 Soil Am-241 Cs-1 34 Cs-1 37 Co-57 Co-60 Mn-54 Ni-63 Pu-238 Pu-239240 K-40 Sr-90 Tc-99 U-234/233 U-238 Zn-65 Bq/L Bq/L Bq/kg Bq/kg Bq/kg Bq/kg Bq/kg Bq/kg Bq/kg Bq/kg Bq/kg Bq/kg Bq/kg Bq/kg Bq/kg Bq/kg Bq/kg 2.09

-99.8-203 46.2 471 173 109 1.50 2.01 13.7 29.0 2.19 2.25 178 1.52 1.18 83.6 393 522 636 3.78 598 571 71.2 0.487 615 178 175 119 115 937 2.31 112.82 213.08 47.5 428.85 165.4 118.62 1.39 1.94 15.69 27.15 2.15 2.22 176.37 2.152 - 3.996 6.005-11.151 3.164 - 5.876 4.373 - 8.121 0.096 - 0.178 0.115- 0.213 1.093 - 2.029 0.146 - 0.270 0.151 -0.281 6.859 - 12.737 1.62 - 3.00 78.98 - 146.66 149.16 - 277.00 33.2-61.8 300.20 - 557.50 115.8 - 215.0 83.03 - 154.21 0.97-1.81 1.36 -2.52 10.98-20.40 19.00- 35.29 1.50 - 2.80 1.55 - 2.89 123.46 - 229.28 1.033

>0.0 - 2.066 1.03 0.52-1.54 105.47 452.13 525.73 676.33 1.98 594.25 627.3 82 0.93 604 223.3 218.01 152.44 158.73 903.61 A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A N (2)

N (2)

N (2)

A A

A 73.83-137.11 316.49 - 587.77 368.01 - 683.45 473.43 - 879.23 415.98-772.52 470.6 - 874.0 57-107 423-785 156.3-290.3 152.61 -283.41 106.71 - 198.17 111.11 -206.35 632.53-1174.69 A

A W

A A

A A (3)

A A

A A (3)

A W

A W

W A

E-6

TABLE E-3 DOE'S MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP)

TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2006 (PAGE 3 OF 3)

Identification Reported Known Acceptance Month/Year Number Media Nuclide Units Value (a)

Value (b)

Range Evaluation (c)

July 2006 06-RdF16 AP Am-241 Cs-1 34 Cs-1 37 Co-57 Co-60 Mn-54 Pu-238 Pu-239/240 Sr-90 U-234/233 U-238 Zn-65 Bq/sample Bq/sample Bq/sample Bq/sample Bq/sample Bq/sample Bq/sample Bq/sample Bq/sample Bq/sample Bq/sample Bq/sample Bq/sample Bq/sample 0.124 2.62 1.98 2.65 1.63 2.10 0.118 0.00822 0.549 0.140 0.136

-0.163 0.134 0.358 0.142 3.147 1.805 2.582 1.577 1.92 0.118 NA 0.62 0.134 0.139 NA 0.099 - 0.185 2.203 - 4.091 1.263 - 2.346 1.807 - 3.357 1.104 - 2.050 1.34 -2.50 0.083 - 0.153 0.43 - 0.81 0.094 - 0.174 0.097 - 0.181 A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A 06-GrF16 AP Gr-A

_Gr-B 0.290

>0.0 - 0.580 0.359 ý 0.180-0.538 (1) False positive test (2) Evaluated as a false positive by MAPEP although we considered the result a non-detect due to the peak not being identified by the gamma software. For Cs-134, MAPEP suggests the Bi-214 is not being differentiated from the Cs-134 peak. See email attached with MAPEP results in Appendix A. NCR 06-07.

(3)

Sr samples analyzed in triplicate and one high result of 2.43 pCi/kg biased the submitted results on the high side.

We were unable to determine the cause for the higher result. Since we do not analyze vegetation for isotpic Pu, no NCR was initiated for the Pu failure. MAPEP suggest pyrosulfate fusion preparation prior to analysis for isotopic Pu in vegetation samples.

(4) Not detected, reported a statistically zero result. (False positive test)

(a) Teledyne Brown Engineering reported result.

(b) The MAPEP known value is equal to 100% of the parameter present in the standard as determined by gravimetric and/or volumetric measurements made during standard preparation.

(c) DOEIMAPEP evaluation: A=acceptable, W=acceptable with warning, N=not acceptable.

E-7

TABLE E-4 ERA(a) STATISTICAL

SUMMARY

PROFICIENCY TESTING PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 2006 (Page 1 of 2)

Concentration (pCi/L)

Lab Code Date Analysis Laboratory ERA Control Resultb Resultc Limits Acceptance STW-1078 STW-1078 STW-1079 STW-1079 STW-1 079 STW-1079 STW-1079 STW-1080 STW-1080 STW-1 081 STW-1081 STW-1081 STW*1 088 STW-1088 STW-1089 STW-1089 STW-1089 STW-1089 STW-1089 STW-1090 STW-1090 STW-1091 STW-1092 STW-1092 STW-1092 STW-1092 STW-1094 STW-1 094 STW-1 095 STW-1 095 STW-1095 STW-1 095 STW-1095 STW-1 096 STW-1096 STW-1097 STW-1097 STW-1 097 01/16/06 01/16/06 01/16/06 01/16/06 01/16/06 01/16/06 01/16/06 01/16/06 01/16/06 01/16/06 01/16/06 01/16/06 04/10/06 04/10/06 04/10/06 04/10/06 04/10/06 04/10/06 04/10/06 04/10/06 04/10/06 04/10/06 04/10/06 04/10/06 04/10/06 04/10/06 07/10/06 07/10/06 07/10/06 07/10/06 07/10/06 07/10/06 07/10/06 07/10/06 07/10/06 07/10/06 07/10/06 07/10/06 Sr-89 Sr-90 Ba-133 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-1 37 Zn-65 Gr. Alpha Gr. Beta Ra-226 Ra-228 Uranium Sr-89 Sr-90 Ba-133 Co-60 Cs-1 34 Cs-1 37 Zn-65 Gr. Alpha Gr. Beta 1-131 H-3 Ra-226 Ra-228 Uranium Sr-89 Sr-90 Ba-133 Co-60 Cs-1 34 Cs-137 Zn-65 Gr. Alpha Gr. Beta Ra-226 Ra-228 Uranium 49.9 +/- 3.5 31.5 +/- 1.5 86.5 +/- 4.1 96.3 +/- 4.1 22.6 +/- 3.0 109.0 +/- 5.9 198.0 +/- 11.2 10.8 +/- 1.4 56.9 +/- 1.9 4.3 +/- 0.4 7.1 +/- 1.8 20.7 +/- 0.5 50.2 30.7 95.0 95.3 23.1 111.0 192.0 9.6 61.9 4.6 6.6 22.1 41.5 -58.9 22.0 - 39.4 78.6 -111.0 86.6 - 104.0 14.4 -31.8 101.0 - 121.0 159.0 -225.0 1.0 - 18.3 44.6 - 79.2 3.4 - 5.8 3.7 -9.5 16.9 -27.3 0.3 -17.7 1.3 - 18.7 103.0 - 123.0 34.7 -52.1 29.0 +/--1.8 8.7 +/- 1.0 10.3 +/-0.4 114.0 +/-2.8 41.9 +/- 1.4 208.0 +/- 1.1 154.0 +/- 0.8 13.4 +/- 1.1 27.7 +/- 2.1 22.0 +/- 0.3 7960.0 +/- 57.0 2.9 +/- 0.4 20.9 +/- 1.2 68.6 +/- 3.4 S3-27*4=

9.0 10.0 113.0 43.4 214.0 152.0 21.3 23.0 19.1 8130.0 3.0 19.1 69.1 195.0 126.0 12.1 14.3 13.9 6720.0 2.2 10.8

- 233.0

- 178.0

- 30.5

-31.7

- 24.3

- 9540.0

-3.8

-27.4 Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pas-s Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass 15.9 +/- 0.7 24.3 +/- 0.4 94.9 +/- 8.9 104.0 +/- 1.8 48.7 +/- 1.3 236.0 +/- 3.0 126.0 +/- 8.0 10.9 +/- 1.0 9.7 +/- 0.4 11.0 +/-_0.5 12.2 +/- 0.8 43.4 +/- 0.1 19.7 25.9 88.1 99.7 54.1 238.0 121.0 10.0 8.9 10.7 10.7 40.3 57.1 -81.1 11.0 -28.4 17.2 -34.6 72.9 - 103.0 91.0 -108.0 45.4 - 62.8 217.0 -259.0 100.0 - 142.0 1.3 -18.6 0.2 - 17.5 7.9 - 13.5 6.1 -15.3 33.3 -47.3 E-8

TABLE E-4 ERA(a) STATISTICAL

SUMMARY

PROFICIENCY TESTING PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 2006 (Page 2 of 2)

Concentration (pCi/L)

Lab Code Date Analysis Laboratory ERA Control Resultb Resultc Limits Acceptance STW-1 104 10/06/06 STW-1104 10/06/06 STW-1 105 10/06/06 STW-1105 10/06/06 STW-1105 10/06/06 STW-1 105 10/06/06 STW-1 105 10/06/06 STW-1 106 10/06/06 STW-1 106 10/06/06 STW-1107 d 10/06/06 STW-1108 10/06/06 STW-1108 10/06/06 ST-M!*:108-

-0/.0.6/06-.

Sr-89 Sr-90 Ba-133 Co-60 Cs-1 34 Cs-1 37 Zn-65 Gr. Alpha Gr. Beta 1-131 Ra-226 Ra-228 Uranjum.m<,

W3 38.4 +/- 1.3 39.9 15.5 +/- 0.5 16.0 64.9 +/- 2.8 70.2 61.6 +/- 1.0 62.3 29.0 +/- 0.9 29.9 77.8 +/- 2.4 78.2 293.0 +/- 2.4 277.0 23.9 +/- 2.5 28.7 23.7 +/- 1.4 20.9 28.4 +/- 1.2 22.1 14.5 +/- 0.5 14.4 6.6 +/- 0.4 5.9

-+/-

?2 9+01-31.2 -45.7 7.3 - 24.7 58.1 - 82.3 53.6 - 71.0 21.2 -38.6 69.5 - 86.9 229.0 - 325.0 16.3 -41.1 12.2 - 29.6 16.9 - 27.3 10.7 - 18.1 3.3 - 8.4

.0-- 8.4- -

-2430*.0'- 3670.0 Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Fail Pass Pass

-Pass-..

Results obtained by Environmental, Inc., Midwest Laboratory as a participant in the crosscheck program for proficiency testing in drinking water conducted by Environmental Resources Associates (ERA).

b Unless otherwise indicated, the laboratory result is given as the mean +/- standard deviation for three determinations.

c Results are presented as the known values, expected laboratory precision (1 sigma, 1 determination) and control limits as provided by ERA.

d The reported result was an average of three analyses, results ranged from 25.36 to 29.23 pCi/L.

A fourth analysis was performed, result of analysis, 24.89 pCi/L.

E-9

TABLE E-5 DOE'S MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEPf ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 2006 (Page 1 of 3)

Concentration b Known Control Lab Codec Date Analysis Laboratory result Activity Limits d Acceptance STVE-1082 STVE-1 082 STVE-1082 STVE-1082 e STVE-1082 STVE-1082 STVE-1082 f STVE-1082 STVE-1082 STVE-1082 STVE-1082 TY-

  • -'IE-t1082--

STSO-1 083 STSO-1 083 STSO-1 083 STSO-1083 STSO-1083 STSO-1083 STSO-1083 STSO-1 083 STSO-1083 f STSO-1 083 f STSO-1083 f STSO-1083 f STSO-1083 01/01/06 01/01/06 01/01/06 01/01/06 01/01/06 01/01/06 01/01/06 01/01/06 01/01/06 01/01/06 01/01/06

-01/01-/06--

01/01/06 01/01/06 01/01/06 01/01/06 01/01/06 01/01/06 01/01/06 01/01/06 01/01/06 01/01/06 01/01/06 01/01/06 01/01/06 Am-241 Co-57 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Mn-54 Pu-238 Pu-239/40 Sr-90 U-233/4 U-238

-Z-n;65 Am-241 Co-57 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-1 37 K-40 Mn-54 Ni-63 Pu-238 Pu-239/40 U-233/4 U-238 Zn-65 0.16 +/- 0.06 10.40 +/- 0.20 5.00 +/- 0.20

< 0.20 3.40 +/- 0.20 6.90 +/- 0.20 0.08 +/- 0.03 0.17 +/- 0.03 1.40 +/- 0.20 0.24 +/- 0.05 0.19 +/- 0.04

.-- 1.10.+/-.0.50,..

54.60 +/- 5.50 762.90 +/- 12.70 504.90 +/- 3.10

< 1.70 406.50 +/- 3.70 719.20 +/- 18.40 415.60 +/- 4.80 261.40 +/- 14.70 14.60 +/- 2.90 14.60 +/- 2.40 13.50 +/- 1.70 15.40 +/- 1.80 783.40 +/- 7.00 0.16 8.58 4.52 0.00 3.07 6.25 0.14 0.16 1.56 0.21 0.22 57.08 656.29 447.10 0.00 339.69 604.00 346.77 323.51 61.15 45.85 37.00 38.85 657.36 0.11 -0.20 6.00 -11.15 3.16 -5.88 2.15 -4.00 4.37 -8.12 0.10 -0.18 0.11 -0.21 1.09 -2.03 0.15 -0.27 0.15 -0.28 S6..86-12:74 -

39.96 - 74.20 459.40 -853.18 312.97 -581.23 237.78 -441.60 422.80 - 785.20 242.74 -450.80 226.46 -420.56 42.81 -79.50 32.09 - 59.61 25.90 - 48.10 27.20 - 50.50 460.15 -854.57 Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Fail Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Fail Fail Fail Fail Pass STAP-1084 01/01/06 Gr. Alpha STAP-1084 01/01/06 Gr. Beta STAP-1 085 STAP-1 085 STAP-1085 STAP-1085 STAP-1085 STAP-1 085 f STAP-1085 e STAP-1085 STAP-1085 STAP-1085 STAP-1085 01/01/06 01/01/06 01/01/06 01/01/06 01/01/06 01/01/06 01/01/06 01/01/06 01/01/06 01/01/06 01/01/06 Am-241 Co-57 Co-60 Cs-1 34 Cs-137 Pu-238 Pu-239/40 Sr-90 U-233/4 U-238 Zn-65 0.26 +/- 0.02 0.51 +/- 0.03 0.12 +/- 0.02 4.32 +/- 0.10 2.24 +/- 0.16 2.96 +/- 0.19 2.64 +/- 0.20 0.03 +/- 0.01

< 0.01 0.77 +/- 0.21 0.03 +/- 0.01 0.02 +/- 0.01 3.94 +/- 0.44 0.36 0.48 0.09 4.10 2.19 2.93 2.53 0.07 0.00 0.79 0.02 0.02 3.42 0.00 -0.72 0.24 - 0.72 0.07 -0.12 2.87 - 5.32 1.53 -2.84 2.05 - 3.81 1.77 - 3.29 0.05 - 0.09 0.55 -1.03 0.01 - 0.03 0.01 - 0.03 2.40 - 4.45 Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Fail Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass E-10

TABLE E-5 DOE'S MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEPr ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 2006 (Page 2 of 3)

Concentration b Known Control Lab Codec Date Analysis Laboratory result Activity Limits d Acceptance STW-1086 STW-1086 STW-1 086 STW-1086 STW-1 086 STW-1 086 STW-1 086 STW-1086 STW-1 086 STW-1086 STW-1086 "STW-1Q086 STW-1086 STW-1086 STW-1086 STW-1086 STW-1 087 STW-1087 01/01/06 01/01/06 01/01/06 01/01/06 01/01/06 01/01/06 01/01/06 01/01/06 01/01/06 01/01/06 01/01/06 01/01/06 01/01/06 01/01/06 01/01/06 01/01/06 Am-241 Co-57 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Fe-55 H-3 Mn-54 Ni-63 Pu-238 Pu-239/40 Sr U-233/4 U-238 Zn-65 Gr. Alpha Gr. Beta 1.29 +/- 0.05 177.10 +/- 1.00 158.30 +/- 1.00 96.40 +/- 1.50

< 0.80 102.50 +/- 18.10 956.60 +/- 16.50 335.30 +/- 2.20 62.90 +/- 3.60 0.96 +/- 0.07

< 0.20 12,80 1,60 22 3bQ-`+/- 2.02 +/- 0.12 2.03 +/- 0.12 249.50 +/- 3.40 0.59 +/- 0.10 1.69 +/- 0.07

<0.14 6.89 +/- 0.17 8.46 +/- 0.16 6.87 +/- 0.29 10.36 +/- 0.29 7.46 +/- 0.50 130.00 +/- 11.60 784.90 +/- 3.80 2.10 +/- 0.90 500.70 +/- 7.40 624.20 +/- 4.90 1.30 166.12 153.50 95.10 0.00 129.60 952.01 315.00 60.34 0.91 0.00 13-16 23138' 2.09 2.17 228.16 0.58 1.13 0.91 -1.69 116.28 -215.96 107.45 - 199.55 66.57 - 123.63 90.72 - 168.48 666.41 -1238.00 220.50 -409.50 42.24 - 78.44 0.70 - 1.30

- 9.21

-17. 11..

-46:37T-30'39 1.46 -2.72 1.52 -2.82 159.71 - 296.61 0.00-1.16 0.56 -1.70 Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass..

Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass STVE-1 098 STVE-1 098 g STVE-1 098 STVE-1 098 STVE-1098 STVE-1098 STSO-1099 STSO-1099 STSO-1099 STSO-1099 STSO-1099 STSO-1 099 STSO-1099 STSO-1099 STSO-1099 STSO-1 099 e STSO-1099 STSO-1099 STSO-1099 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 Co-57 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Mn-54 Zn-65 0.00 5.81 7.49 5.50 8.35 5.98 4.06 - 7.55 5.24 - 9.73 3.85 -7.14 5.85 - 10.86 4.19 -7.78 Am-241, Co-57 Co-60 Cs-1 34 Cs-137 K-40 Mn-54 Ni-63 Pu-238 Pu-239/40 U-233/4 U-238 Zn-65 701.30 699.20 614.40 79.90 150.50 151.60 1021.90

+/- 3.40

+/- 5.20

+ 17.10

_ 5.80

< 0.70

+/- 5.90

+/- 6.00

+/- 9.20 105.47 676.33 1.98 452.13 525.73 604.00 594.25 672.30 82.00 0.00 152.44 158.73 903.61 73.83 -137.11 473.43 -879.23 0.00 -5.00 316.49 -587.77 368.01 -683.45 423.00 -785.00 415.98 -772.52 470.60 -874.00 57.00 -107.00 106.71 -198.17 111.11 -206.35 632.53 -1175.00 Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass E-11

TABLE E-5 DOE'S MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEPf ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 2006 (Page 3 of 3)

Concentration b Known Control Lab Codec Date Analysis Laboratory result Activity Limits d Acceptance STAP-1100 STAP-1100 STAP-1 100 STAP-1 100 STAP-1100 STAP-1 100 STAP-1100 STAP-1100 STAP-1100 STAP-1100 STAP-1 100 STAP-1 101 STAP71.1 01 STW-1102 STW-1102 STW-1 103 STW-1 103 STW-1103 STW-1103 STW-1103 STW-1103 STW-1103 STW-1103 e STW-1103 STW-1 103 STW-1103 STW-1103 STW-1 103 STW-1103 STW-1103 STW-1103 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/016 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 Am-241 Co-57 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Mn-54 Pu-238 Sr-90 U-233/4 U-238 Zn-65 Gr. Alpha Gr. Beta Gr. Alpha Gr. Beta Am-241 Co-57 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Fe-55 H-3 Mn-54 Ni-63 Pu-238 Pu-239/40 Sr-90 Tc-99 U-233/4 U-238 Zn-65 0.16 +/- 0.03 2.17 +/- 0.06 1.38 +/- 0.07 2.52 +/- 0.13 1.64 +/- 0.08 1.76 +/- 0.18 0.09 +/- 0.02 0.66 +/- 0.21 0.15 +/- 0.02 0.13 + 0.02

< 0.07 0.08 +/- 0.03 0.41 +/- 0.05 0.76 +/- 0.07 1.23 +/- 0.06 1.86 +/- 0.09 224.10 +/- 1.20 49.40 +/- 0.50 112.70 +/- 0.90 206.60 _ 1.40 138.40 _ 5.40 446.50 +/- 11.80

< 0.30 116.70 +/- 3.60 1.27 +/- 0.07 1.67 +/- 0.08 16.40 +/- 1.90 29.40 +/- 1.10 1.97 +/- 0.08 1.97 +/- 0.08 192.50 +/- 2.40 0.14 2.58 1.58 3.15 1.81 1.92 0.12 0.62 0.13 0.14 0.00 0.29 0.36 1.03 1.03 2.31 213.08 47.50 112.82 196.14 165.40 428.85 0.00 118.62 1.39 1.94 15.69 27.15 2.15 2.22 176.37 0.10 -0.19 1.81 -3.36 1.10 -2.05 2.20 - 4.09 1.26 -2.35 1.34 -2.50 0.08 -0.15 0.43 - 0.81 0.09 -0.17 0.10 -0.18 0.00 - 0.58 0.18 -0.54 0.00 - 2.07 0.52 -1.54 1.62 -3.00 149.16 -277.00 33.20 -61.80 78.97 - 146.66 137.30 -254.98 115.80 -215.00 300.20 - 557.50 83.03 -154.21 0.97 - 1.81 1:36 -2.52 10.98 -20.40 19.00 - 35.29 1.50 -2.80 1.55 -2.89 123.46 -229.28 Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass

Pass, Pass a Results obtained by Environmental, Inc., Midwest Laboratory as a participant in the Department of Energy's Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program, Idaho Operations office, Idaho Falls, Idaho b Results are reported in units of Bq/kg (soil), Bq/L (water) or Bq/total sample (filters, vegetation).

Laboratory codes as follows: STW (water), STAP (air filter), STSO (soil), STVE (vegetation).

d MAPEP results are presented as the known values and expected laboratory precision (1 sigma, 1 determination) and control limits as defined by the MAPEP.

e Included in the MAPEP as a false positive.

f Difficulties with the analyses for transuranics isotopes in solid samples (Filters, Soil and vegetation),

were attributed to incomplete dissolution of the samples. Soil samples were repeated, results of reanalyses:

Pu-238, 53.1 +/- 5.3 bq/kg. Pu-239/240, 42.4 +/- 4.7 bq/kg. U-233/4, 33.3 +/- 3.5 bq/kg. U-238, 35.5 +/- 3.6 bq/kg.

g The July vegetation sample was provided in two separate geometries, (100 ml. and 500 ml.). Results reported here used the 500 ml. standard size geometry. Results for the 100 ml. geometry showed approximately a 15% higher bias.

E-12

APPENDIX F ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM REPORT (ARGPPR)