ML053480393
| ML053480393 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Beaver Valley |
| Issue date: | 12/09/2005 |
| From: | FirstEnergy Corp |
| To: | Rebecca Karas Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Ngbea E S | |
| References | |
| 70FR50442 00034, PR-26, RIN 3150-AF12 | |
| Download: ML053480393 (3) | |
Text
5Y - new rules for nuder oWerator
--- Page 1 1 DOatUNUPMR-
<glumacl@firstenergycorp.com>
<rlk@nrc.gov>
Fri, Dec 9, 2005 4:09 PM new rules for nuder operator From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
QoOKETED USNRC December 13, 2005 (4:29pm)
OFFICE OF SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND ADJUDICATIONS STAFF hi, i would like to input my comments on the new rules for nuclear operator fatigue.
your rules are set up to limit fatigue for operators who work 12 hour1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> shifts,and not 8 hour9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> shifts,your rules will force us to change our work schedule to comply with the 7 days in a row. i work at beaver valley power station.
I have worked as a operator for over 25 years, both on 8 hour9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> shifts and 12 hour1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> shifts,you will be forcing the entire industry to go to 12 hour1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> shifts which results in greater fatigue then working 7 days in a row,which makes me wonder if fatigue is realy a concern or if you have a agenda to see all operation departments working 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />.
I would like to talk to you person to person on this subject, is there a number that you can be reached at,or is this a done deal? thanks The information contained in this message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the original message.
CC:
<lglumac@comcast.net>
-Fe MP I O,+e- = Se-011-0 b ?
SE -0;1.
rules for nuder operator From:
Rebecca Karas To:
Desaulniers, David; Diec, David; McCune, Timothy Date:
Mon, Dec 12, 2005 7:22 AM
Subject:
Fwd: new rules for nuder operator Please docket the attached as a comment on the Part 26 proposed rule. Either of the Daves - one of you should probably email back.
CC:
Ngbea, Evangeline
LnmrAUwiUUUU2.
MP Na-ae 511 mDWUU rw_+s~MP=~
Paae 1~--
Mail Envelope Properties (439D6B6D.CE9: 24: 456)
Subject:
Creation Date:
From:
Created By:
Fwd: new rules for nucler operator 12/12/05 7:22AM Rebecca Karas RLK@nrc.gov Recipients nrc.gov OWGWPO01.HQGWDOO1 DRD (David Desaulniers) nrc.gov owf4_po.OWFN_DO DTD (David Diec) nrc.gov owf5_po.OWFNDO ESN CC (Evangeline Ngbea) nrc.gov twf2_po.TWFNDO TSM5 (Timothy McCune)
Post Office OWGWPO0l.HQGWDOO1 owf4_po.OWFNDO owf5_po.OWFN_DO twf2_po.TWFN_DO Route nrc.gov nrc.gov nrc.gov nrc.gov Files MESSAGE Mail Options Expiration Date:
Priority:
Reply Requested:
Return Notification:
Concealed
Subject:
Security:
Size 474 Date & Time 12/12/05 07:22AM None Standard No None No Standard