RBG-46297, Fitness-For-Duty Program Six-Month Performance Data Report
| ML042080250 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | River Bend  |
| Issue date: | 07/20/2004 |
| From: | Lorfing D Entergy Operations |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| G1.51, G9.5, RBF1-04-0129, RBG-46297 | |
| Download: ML042080250 (5) | |
Text
-- Entegy Entergy Operations, Inc.
River Bend Station 5485 U. S. Highway 61 N St. Francisville, LA 70775 Fax 225 635 5068 July 20, 2004 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555
Subject:
River Bend Station - Unit 1 Docket No. 50-458 License No. NPF-47 River Bend Station Fitness-For-Duty Program Six-Month Performance Data Report File No.:
G9.5, G1.51 RBG-46297 RBF1 0129 Gentlemen:
Pursuant to 10CFR26.71 (d) "Recordkeeping requirements," enclosed is River Bend Station's Fitness-for-Duty (FFD) Six-Month Program Performance Data Report for the report period January 1, 2004, through June 30, 2004. This report contains statistical data and trend analysis compiled by the Fitness-for-Duty Department.
Should you have any questions regarding the attached, please contact Ms. Dee Childress at (225) 381-3655 or Mr. Bill Fountain of my staff at (225) 381-4625.
Sincerely, David N. Lorfing Manager - Licensing (Acting)
DNL/WJF enclosure
%01ZA
i River Bend Station Fitness-For-Duty Program Six-Month Performance Data Report RBG-46297 Page 2 of 2 cc:
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 Arlington, TX 76011 NRC Resident Inspector (w/o)
P. 0. Box 1050 St. Francisville, LA 70775 Mr. Michael K. Webb, NRR Project Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission M/S OWFN / 7D-1 Washington, DC 20555
Enclosure to RBG-46297 FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE DATA PERSONNEL SUBJECT TO 10CFR26 Entergy Operations, Inc.
Company 06/30/04 6 Months Ending River Bend Station Location Dee Childress Contact Name (225) 381-3655 Phone (Include Area Code)
Cutoffs:
Marijuana Cocaine Opiates Screen / Confirmation 50 / 15 Amphetamines 300 / 150 Phencyclidine 300 / 300 Alcohol (%BAC)
O Appendix A to 1 OCFR26 1000 / 500 N/A 25 / 25 N/A 0.04%
N/A l
Licensee Long-Term Short-Term Testing Results Employees Contractor Contractor Personnel Personnel Average Number with Unescorted Access 675 N. /A 231 Categories Tested Positive Tested Positive Tested Positive Pre-Access 29 1/0 N/A N/A 87 1/0 For-Cause (Post accident) 0 0/0 N /A N /A 1
0/0 For-Cause (Behavior) 0 0/0 N / A N / A 0
0/0 Random 182 1/0 N/A N/A 63 0/0 Follow-Up 18 0/0 N/A N/A 0
0/0 Other 0
0/0 N/A N/A 0
0/0 Total 229 2/0 N/A N/A 151 1/0 Page 1 of 3
Enclosure to RBG-46297 BREAKDOWN OF CONFIRMED POSITIVE TESTS FOR SPECIFIC SUBSTANCES January - June 2004 Marijuana Cocaine Opiates Amphetamines Phencyclidine Alcohol Refusal 1
2 3
4 5
~to T est Licensee Employees 0/0 2
0 0
0 0
0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Long-Term Contractor N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Short-Term Contractor 0/0 1
0 0
0 0
0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total f 0/0 J 3 1 0 0
f 0
0 0
1N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1Z Page 2 of 3
Enclosure to RBG-46297 Fitness for Duty Program Six Month Performance Report January - June 2004 PROGRAM
SUMMARY
The River Bend Station annual random testing rate is 50 percent. During this reporting period, approximately 27.0 percent of the population has been randomly tested. The rate of positive tests from random testing is.041 percent.
POSITIVE RESULTS:
During a random screening, an Entergy employee tested positive for cocaine, and then returned as a pre-access screen to test positive again. One contract employee tested positive for cocaine during the pre-access screening process.
MANAGEMENT ACTIONS:
The Entergy employee who tested positive on a random test was sent home for 14 days without pay and denied access to the facility. He then returned after the 14 days to re-inprocess, signed a re-entry agreement and test positive again at a higher level. He was permanently denied access.
The contractor who tested positive for cocaine was denied for three years.
In both cases, management was notified and the employee files were annotated to reflect the positive results and the actions taken.
EVENTS REPORTED TO THE NRC:
During this reporting period, there were no violations of the fitness for duty program that were reportable.
PROGRAM EVALUATION:
No programmatic problems were identified during this reporting period.
Page 3 of 3