L-88-491, Forwards Summary of mgt-on-shift Weekly Repts,Per Commission 871019 Order

Forwards Summary of mgt-on-shift Weekly Repts,Per Commission 871019 Order

ML17345A539
Person / Time
Site:	Turkey Point
Issue date:	11/07/1988
From:	Conway W FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:	Ernst M NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
References
L-88-491, NUDOCS 8811280041
Download: ML17345A539 (37)

Text

gc Cp~~TED Dl BUTION DEMONSTR ON SYSTEM REGULATO,.

INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION TEM (RIDS)

ACCESSION NBR:8811280041 DOC.DATE: 88/11/07 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET i

FACIL:50-250'Turkey Point Plant, Unit 3, Florida Power and Light C 05000250 50-251 Turkey Point. Plant, Unit 4, Florida Power and Light C

'05000251 AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION CONWAY,W.E.

Florida Power

& Light Co.

RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION ERNST,M.L.

~Region 2, Ofc of the Director

SUBJECT:

Forwards summary of mgt-on-shift repts,per 871019 order.

DISTRIBUTION CODE:

D036D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR 'I ENCL /

SIZE:

3 &

TITLE: Turkey Point Management Onshift Program NOTES:

RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME DRP/ADR-2 PD2-2 PD INTERNAL: AEOD NRR-DEPY NRR MORISSEAUgD NRR/ADT 12-G-18 NRR/DOEA DIR 11 NUDOCS-ABSTRACT OGC/HDS2 RGN2 FILE W j EXTERNAL: LPDR NSIC COPIES LTTR ENCL 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

l.

1 1

1 1

1 1

1

1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME NRR/DRP-1/2 EDISON,G DEDRO NRR DIR NRR/ADP 12-G-18 NRR/DLPQ/PEB

'NRR/DRIS DIR 9A

'OE LIEBERMANIJ EG PI&

NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL 1

1 2

2 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

'1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 R

gc)'b NOXE 'IO ALL RIDS" RECIPZERIS:

PIZASE HELP US 1Q REDUCE HASTE!

CKWZACZ 'IHE DOCUMENI'XKIBOLDESK, HXN Pl-37 (EXT. 20079)

KO EIlQGlQZE WAR SAME PKH DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUlKMZS YOU DCRPT NEED)

D S

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:

LTTR

. 23, ENCL 23

P. 0 14000, JUNO BEACH, FL 33408.0420 e

~

~

~ qa NOVEMBER 7

$988 L-88-491 Mr. Malcolm L. Ernst Acting Regional Administrator, Region II U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street, N. W., Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323

Dear Mr. Ernst:

Re:

Turkey Point Units 3 and 4

Docket Nos.

50-250 and 50-.251 Mana ement-on-Shift Weekl Re ort Puisuant to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Order dated October 19, 1987, the attached summary of Management-on-Shift (MOS) reports is submitted.

The Plant Supervisor-Nuclear Shift Reports are also being submitted.

Should there be any questions on this information, please contact us

~

Very truly yours, W. F.

Conway Senior Vice President Nuclear WFC/RHF/gp Attachment cc:

,J.

Lieberman, Director, Office of Enforcement, USNRC Dr.

G.

E. Edison, Project Manager,

NRR, USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC, Turkey Point Plant R.

E. Talion, President, FPL mos 001 881 128004 5 -882 1 07 PDR

• DOCH, 05000250 R

PNL1 D~cH5 an FPL Group company

MANAGEMENT ON SHIFT (MOS)

WEEKLY SUMARY REPORT WEEK STARTING:

10/28/88 PAGE I

op 1

Four MOS Observers were on shift.

D. R. Powell, Operating Experience Feedback Coordinator, Juno Beach (10/28-31/88, days);

R.

P.

Sackschewsky, Westinghouse Electric'orporation'10/28;31/88, nights); J.

B. Hosmer, Director of Nuclear Engineering, Juno Beach (ll/01-03/88, days);

J.

W.

Patterson, Westinghouse Electric Corporation (10/31-11/04/88, nights).

Unit 3 remained in mode 5 and Unit 4 remained defueled for the duration of the reporting period.

No immediate safety problems were noted.

The observers did not note any questionable work practices.

They did note thirteen areas for improvement, as follows:

Two items on cleanliness control Two items on contamination control

- One item on personnel safety

- Two items on health physics support Two items on communication One item on drawings

- Two items on control of manpower

- One item on assignment of work orders The Plant Supervisors-Nuclear noted one questionable work practice on the issuance of letters to the control room that lack clarity and are open to interpretation.

They also noted six areas for improvement, as follows:

- One item on hardware breakage, repeated by an observer

- Two items on document control

- One item on spare parts One item on communication

- One item on work controls ATTACHMENT: MOS DAILY REPORTS

)ate 10 Shift Report

'SN brogan Shift Management AI'N Singer NWl>etrom lie A.

Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B.

Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken None C.

Good Practices/Professionalism Observed Routine operations

cviewed B9.

)ate 10/28/88 Shift Report Peaks

'SN Shift Management Schimkus AI~SN Reese N~I. Newton A.

Question-shee Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B.

Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken Tonight an effort was made to expedite the removal of PORV-3-456 to allow inspection/repair.

The progress moved swiftly to process the applicable paperwork, OTSCs, etc.,Pe

-le were actually dressing out to start work when it was discovered during PSN, PWO re.

=, that no clearance request was submitted, i.e., no clearance hung to perform the work.

This was partially due to the clearance releases required to perform multiple stroke tes~

across mid/day shift on 10/28/88.

This appears to-have been overlooked (clearance re-hung) due to the constantly changing workscope for PORV-456 all day.

Recomme"dation:

Slow down - do it right.

(88-2919)

C.

Good Practices/Professionalism Observed IVould like to show appreciation to Mechanical Maintenance and IGC peak shift supervision for staying on top of PORV-456 work progress.

Although we had one minor hitch due to no clearance request for work, the Nuclear Operators/RCO worked quickly to initiate the required clearances and hung these clearances on the pressur~r so work could start.

0-ADM-019 Magement on Shift (MOS) ~

MOS DAILYREPORT To'perations Superintendent

- Nuclear Date:

10/28/88 From:

David Powell Shift:

Qx Day

~ Night A.

Plant Evolutions Observed Unit 3 in mode 5; unit 4,,defueled

,Unit.4 containment entry - tour Spent fuel pool - work on installing equipment Shift turnovers and briefings Various ongoing maintenance activities Radiation Control Area (RCA) tours B.

Immediate Safety Problems None C.

Questionable Work Practices None Areas for Improvement None Professionalism, Summary of Shift,,Comments Shift briefings were lengthy but detailed and informative.

Personnel from Health Physics hav not been routinely attending the meetings that I have witnessed.

Their comments about any HP concerns on on-going jobs would be helpful, espe" w!i"if they have been experiencing any problems.

(88-2922)

Other work seems to have been conducted without major problems or obstacles.

A good days worth of activity from what I saw and reviewed.

~(7 Completed By:

D v" P well server Date:

10 28/88 Reviewed By:

Operations Superintendent-Nuclear Date:

Management Review By:

/(. g f't ate'T 14 10/28/88

0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS) ~

MOS l)AlLYREI'ORT I'age To:

Operations Superintendent

- Nuclear Date:

10/28-29/88 From:

Roy Sackschewsky

(

bseruer)

Shift:

0 Day

~x Night A.

Plant Bvohrtions Observed Unit 4, defueled Unit 3 in mode 5 Shtft turnover Unit 3, containment tour

-Removing insulation from pressurizer Tu-.~e platform tour Co=~l room operations B;

Immediate Safety Problems None C.

D.

Questionable Work Practices None Areas for Improvement None B.

Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Shift turnover w'as well organized and progressed smoothly.

Priority lists for both units were made available.

During an Amiliary Building tour it was noted tha. the door to the containment Self Contained Breathing Apparatus cabinet was broken from its hinges.

It was sugg~

" that the" Scott air packs stored in the cabinet have seals placed on their ~~dies to ensure the user that they are ready for use.

The Nuclear Watch Eng.neer directed Health Physics to comple:e this action.

Completed By:

Roy Sackschewsky seruer 10/28-29/88 Reviewed By:

Management Review By:

perations uperintendent-Nuclear g~ii gi ate Date:

/

VP 1I 10/28-29/88

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

< ~ I

~

~ I ~

I

~ II I~ '

~ ~

~

I

~

W>

~

~

~ '

~

~

~

~ ~

~

~

~

~

~ I

~

~ ~"

~

~

1

~

~

~

matc 10/Z9/88 Shift Report hjft Da s

Shift Management Wogan

+ ~~SN

'inger N~yVetromile A.

Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B.

Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken None C.

Good Practices/Pr'ofessionalism Observed Routine operations

)ate 10 29/88 Shift Report Peaks

'SN Schimkus Shift Management A1'SN

Reese, N~ ~Vetromile A.

Questionable Vork Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B.

Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken Tonight early on peak shift, Construction accidently broke a hole in the plant fire protection water main as they were performing excavation work.

The APSN and NWE immediately took steps to isolate the leak, One complete pass of isolating the leak perimeter valves was unsuccessful.

A second pass was made giving double valve isolation to the leak still with no success.

All the perimeter valves were exercised and closed to accomplish isolation in the event of debris under valve seats, still no success.

Both fire pumps had to be secured to lower pressure of fire main to allow pipe removal.

Action: Put PWOs on PIV-28 and 25 to inspect valve seats.

Recommend:

If problem found due to calcium carbonate build-up, we should inspect all PIVs in system.

(88-2920)

C.

Good Practices/Professionalism Observed The fire main break was handled in a quick, step by step, professional manner by the peakshift APSN, NWE, ANPO.

The NWE utilized a clearance to allow valve manipulations, etc., which enabled a valid work control plus isolation of the leak.

The FPL and Bechtel Construction Supervisors were immediately on hand to commence pipe removal/repair.

The APSN utilized much common sense (not written in procedure) to have all groups stop any hot work.

The plant was informed by plant page of the situation and requested to-stop all cu: ing, grind'~, welding, etc., which could be a fire source.

There were numerous instances of doing the right actions "y all personnel involved.

Good communication and profess iona! is m.

tvie~ed Bg

0-ADM-0)9 Ma gement on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAlLYREPORT Vase To:

Operations Superintendent

- Nuclear Date:

10 29 88 From:

David Powell seruer Shift:

Qg Day Night h.

Phmt Evolutions Observed 0

~

0 Unit 3 in mode 5, unit 4, defueled Shift turnovers Reactor Coolant Pump (RCP) seal replacement work J - nozzle work Unit 4 containment tour Radiation Control Area (RCA)/plant tours Various maintenance evolutions B.

1mmediate Safety Problems None C.

Questionable Work Practices None D.

Areas for Improvement None E.

Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments turnovers and briefings were thorough and complete.

Work efforts appear to have progressed smoothly throughout the day.

The ire main was broken toward the en" of my shif:.

Efforts by the PSN,

APSN, Watch

Engineer, etc.

to resolve this probler.;

progressed

~ logically.

Actions taken were well thought out and coordinated.

Completed By:

M bseruer Date:

R'eviewed By:

perations Superintendent-Nuclear Management Review By:

il4IA / ol.u1~

ate V

i~i~~( f VI 10/29/88

0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

&OS l)hlLYREPORT I'age To:

Operations Superintendent-Nuclear Date:

10/29-,30/88 From:

Ray Sackschewsky

(

bseruer)

"Shift:

Q Day Qx Night

. Plant Evolutions Observed Unit 3 in mode 5 Unit 4, defueled Control room operationst

-Fire main rupture OSP-041.4 Unit 4 containment tour

-Reactor Coolant Pump (RCP) seal removal

-,Steam Generator (S/G) - J-Tube repair

-S/G Eddy current test Fire main repair B.

Immediate Safety Problems None C.

Questionable Work Practices None D.

Areas for Improvement None Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments All nHot Work" was stopped for the evening due to the Fire Main problem.

The operational sta.'.

approac..

to the problem was

thorough, well thought through and conserva:ive.

Opera..ng staff kept informed of progress throughout the shift.

Completed By:

Ro Sackschewskv seruer Date:

10/29-30/88 Reviewed By:

Management Review By:

perations upe rintendent-Nuclear

/W r ate Date te 10/29-30/88

)ate 10/30/88 Shift Report Mids

'SN Jones Shift Mana gement A1'SN Haley NWE A.

Questionable

%'ork Practices/Actions Taken/RecommendatIons None 1

B.

Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken None C.

Good Practices/Professionalism Observed Routine ope rat ions evjewed Bg

l)ate 0

Shift Report.,,

PSN Shift Management

'Wogan AI SN Singer NQf$: Vetromile A.

Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B.

Areas for Improvement/Recommendatlons/Actions Taken None C.

Good Practices/Professionalism Observed Routine operations

.v/ewed Bg

l)sic 10/30/88 Shift Report PSN Shitt Management Schimkus Reese AI7SN gptromlle A.

Questionable Pork Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B.

" Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken PORV-3-455C was suspected to be binding on Friday, 10/03/88.

A decision was made not to pull FCV-3-455A blank flange due to worker exposure,,which would allow a constant controllable 2.2 sq. in. RCS opening while both PORVs were being worked, The PORV-455C work was to be of short duration.

The 2.2 sq. in. opening was to be the PORV-456 open body (valve removed. for repair).

Tonight, multiple problems were discovered on FORV-455C due to a defective, pressure indicator on the nitrogen regulator.

The PSN consulted with numerous members of our plant management to arrive at a solution to make PORV-455C an operable vent path in lieu of its failed pressure indicator.

The action plan per responsible departments was to OTSC the applicable procedures to allow a calibrated portable gage, be installed each day.to verify actual, pressure (nitrogen) after which the gage would be removed till surveillance scheduled, on the next day.

During the pressure

check, PORV nitrogen would be isolated to allow gage installation, open nitrogen supply and verify

'ressure, close nitrogen supply and remove gage followed by re-opening nitrog'en supply.

The shift director felt that while nitrogen is isolated, the 2.2 sq. in. RCS vent is inoperable.

Technical Specifications state that if bo'th FORVs become inoperable - Open the PORV and its associated block valve, ADM-021 only informs to provide'a 2.2 sq.in. opening and surveillance is every 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> to ensure opening is maintained.

Due to PORV-3-456 being'ready for installation on 10/31/88 midshift, (peakshift)

PSN had made the decision to allow installation until shift directors safety concern.

The PSN contacted all individuals of Regulation and.Compliance and they agreed with the shift director that we could not take credit for PORV-455C vent path until both nitrogen and instuwent air was totally operable.

The PSN requested that the original plan of pulling PCV-455A flange be pulled to allo~

work on both PORVs and maintain Technical Specification vent path.

Reco-...mend:

1.

Technical Specifications or licensing letter have written instructions concerning PORV back up nitrogen system operability information.

(88-2923)

(88 2924)

V'hen a )ob on critica! path or extremely close to critical path commences to cause a problem due to operability concerns, be re-evaluated immediately by the shift director who in turn should coordinate the maintenance group activity.

This would involve notifying the PSN of the problem and actions to be taken.

The PSN can then evaluate the Technical Specifications involved.

viewed Bg

Da te

~

10/30/88 Shift Report Sch>mkus Page Continuation Page" 3.

If policy is to be more conservative than what is written in Technical Specifications then write this down.

If'not, then inform" all plant personnel that the PSN shall follow Technical Specifications word-for-word.

(88-2925)

C.

Good Practices/Professionalism Observed None

0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS) ~

MOS DAILYREPORT To Operations Su pe'ri ntendent - Nuclear Date'.

10 30 88 From:

David Powell server)

Shift:

Q Day Q Night Plant Evolutions Observed Unit 3 in mode 5, Unit 4, defueled Containment tour, unit 4 Radiation Control Area/plant tours Shift turnovers B.

Immediate Safety Problems None C.

Questionable Vork Practices None D.

Areas for Improvement None E.

Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Shift turnover/briefings were very good.

The fire main was brought into service without any problems.

Quiet day overall.

Completed By:

David Powell seruer Date:

10/30/88 Reviewed By:

Operations uperi ntendent-Nuclear Date:

Management Review By:

JQr ulo ~

ate ate VP Il 10/30/88

0-ADM-019 Man~gem'ent on Shift (MOS)

%0 8 DAlLY RE po RT

~

'I'o:

Operations Superintendent-Nuclear Date:

10/30-31/88 From:

Ro Sackschewsk

(

seruer)

Shift:

Q Day Qx Night Plant Evolutions Observed Unit 3 in mode 5 Unit 4 defueled Tour turbine deck Tour auxiliary building Tour Radiation Control Area (RCA)

-Power Operated Relief Valve (FORV) work observed Control room opertions Shift turnover B.

Immediate Safety Problems None C.

Questionable Work Practices None D.

Areas for Improvemenmt None Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Shift turnover went smoothly.

Work is focusing on unit 3 PORV replacement and testing.

Very little contract work being completed on Sunday evening.

It was note" thar seals have been placed on the Scott air packs as recommended earlier in the wMh.

Completed By:

bseroer Date:

Reviewed By:

perations uperi nfendent-uclear Date Management Review By:

afe ate 10/30-31/88

i)ate 10/31/88 Shift Report Mids i~SN Jones Shift Management AI'N Haley NWE h.

Questionable Vork Practices/hctions Taken/Recommendations None B.

hreas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken None C.

Good Practices/Professionalism Observed Routine operations

.vIewcd Bp'

t)ate 10 8

Shift Report Shift Management Wogan Singer N~g Vetromile A.

Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B.

Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken None C.

Good Practices/Professionalism Observed Routine operations evfewcd Bf

l)ate 10/31/88 Shift Report Peaks-PSN Shift Management Anderson Al~SN Dallau N~ I;Spence A.

Questionable Vork Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B.

Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken The Procedure Basis Documents in the control room are not controlled documents.

hiany times these documents are used to interpret steps and requirements of procedures to prevent LERs and violations.

Due to this importance I think it would be pertinent to have them accurate and up to date.

, (88-2959)

C.

Good Practices/Professionalism Observed Again, I think J.

Webb and -Operations support should be recognized for their continuing effort to keep operations up to date'on outage work and plans.

0-ADM-019 agement on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAIl.YREPORT To:

Opera tions Superintendent,- Nuclear Date:

From:

David Powell

(

bseruerj Plant Evolutions Observed Shi ft:

Qx Day Q Night Unit 3 in mode 5; unit 4, defueled Radiation Control Area (RCA) tour Plant tour Removal of liftingrig from unit 4 Shift turnover and briefing B.

C.

D.

Immediate Safety Problems None Questionable Work Practices None Areas for Improvement The unit 4 personnel access hatch dressout area should be more thoroughly cleaned.

This area has not been used for unit 4 access during the past few days and does not look like it received a good cleanup following the termination of its use.

This area has been like this for four or five days.

(88-2926) 2.

I noted several items during the removal of a liftingrig from unit 4 today:

a.

It took over 25 minutes for Health Physics to arrive to the equipment hatch to monitor the removal work.

Waiting for the HP to arrive were:

5 Bechtel journeymen, a crane operator, an FPL Supervisor, 2 Bechtel safety people and 2 personnel who were dressed out and were to cover up the rig for transport outside the contaminated area.

The FPL Supervisor indicated that he had notified HP twice that they were ready to start.

(88-2953) b.

Personnel safety was compromised by allowing personnel to walk under and beside the rig when it was being manipulated.

At one point 5

people walked by when the rig was being moved into a horizontal position.

Two cranes were being used to do this and two spotters were necessary to direct the crane operators.

The rig was not overly stable during this operation.

I went over to one of the Bechtel safety people and asked why people were being allowed access while this was occurring.

He did not know but I.

think he mentioned something to the personnel, as ingress/egress was then stopped.

During these evolutions, access needs to be

halted, or at least limited to ensure personnel safety.

This was not the case during this evolution.

(88-2954)

Q-ADM-019 Management on Shift(MOS) ~

~ MOS DAlLYREPORT 2

Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Shift turnovers and briefings were good.

General comments from a week of touring the plant:

I.

A large number of times I'e noted people standing around waiting for something to do.

At times there have-been many (example: fire main pipe break - 12 to 20 people for at least 30 minutes) or a few (example:.

3 journeymen, OC inspector, guard, PPL Construction Supervisor waiting for an operator to do a partial release on the Steam Generator S/G code safeties.

This was in order to install the air movers to support the J-Nozzle effort. I waited there 25 minutes.

I'm not sure how long after I left

= it took to get the operator there).

Supervisors need to be asking-nwhy,n when they see this occur:

I'm not sure that this is being done, and I never observed a supervisor doing this. At times it also seemed like there were an inordinate number of people being used to perform a given task.

Il (88-2955) 2.

The ALARA area coordinator position seems to be very effective.

These people are knowledgeable, aggressive and conscientious.

3.

I'e noticed personnel inside containmen5 or in the roped off areas who have their PCs partially unzipped.

Some of these people are HPs. The St. Lucie'response to this practice was to have personnel tape the zippers.

(88-2956) 4.

During my containment tours I talked with the HP ALARA personnel who spend a lot of time at different stations.

I asked these people if they have seen many FPL Supervisors or safety personnel in containment.

With the exception of the superintendents, they indicated that they see these people very infrequently.

(88-2957)

Completed By:

David Powell server Date:

Reviewed By:

perations uperi ntendent-uc ear Management Review By:

~ at I kl I U I &i le ate' ll

~ gg Q

ate 10/31/88

0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

&OS l)A1LYREl'ORT Lo'perations Superintendent

- Nuclear Date:

10/31-11/01//88 From:

John Patterson

(

bseruer)

. Shift:

Q Day

@ Night, Plant Bvolutions Observed Units 3 and 4 shutdown Shift.turnover briefing Tour of unit 4 containment Tour in intake structure B.

Immediate Safety Problems'one C.

Questionable Vork Practices None D.

Areas for Improvement None Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments

?members of the plant staff took strong, decisive steps to rectify some problems identified with power operated relief valve maintenance.

Completed By:

John Patterson bseruer Date:

10 31-11 01 88 Reviewed By:

perations uperi ntendent-uclear Date: II

~

Management Review By:

ate ate

/

vF

. 10/31-11/01/88

11/01 88 Shift Report Mids Jones Shift Management At'SN Haley NWI:

A.

Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B.

Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken None C.

Good Practices/Professionalism Observed Routine operations

)ate 1 01 88 Shift Report Da s

'SN Shift MilligelAcht Wogan p ) SN Singer Vetromile A.

C?uestionabie Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B.

Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken None C.

Good Practices/Professionalism Observed Routine operations iewed Bg'

0 ADM-019 anagement on Shift(MOS)

MOS DAll.YREPORT To:

Operations Superintendent

- Nuclear Date:

From:

(M bse rue r)

Shift:'x Day Night Plant Evolutions Observed.

Unit 3 in mode 5 Unit 4 defueled Unit 3 Main Steam Isolation Valve (MSIV) stroke time testing

-portions of Power Operated Relief Valve (PORV) testing Unit 4 valve maintenance Control room shift turnover 6 A.M. and 2 P.M. status meetings B.

Immediate Safety Problems None C.

Questionable Work Practices None hreas for Improvement Control room Hagan IWDs - Although no index apparently exists, it appears that one Hagan drawing, 5960036, is not available as a-controlled drawing in the control room.

Hagan dwg. 5610-M-430-237 references dwg. 5960036 in the lower right hand corner but the referenced drawing is not available

'n the control room.

Operations

~ made a

phone call and immediately obtained the needed information, but felt as I did that the drawing is missing.

Recommendation:

Place drawing in the control room.

(88-2829}

2..

Damage assessment

- Extent of damage to the unit 4 coil stack caused by a

dropped metal plate was not aggressively passed to operations.

Tom Wogan had to call at oeak shift turnover to determine status.

Recommendation:

In the 6 A.M. and 2 P.M. meetings, assign a person and a time when operations will be provided status.

(88-2960)

0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS) ~

MOS DAILYREPORT Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments The control room 3 P.M. turnover briefing in the control room was excellent.

Shift 5 appropriately challenged and pursued the proper method for shifting Component Cooling Water pumps.

Shift 2 had good control of MSIV stroRe time and PORV testing.

\\

Completed By:

John Hosmer server 11 01 88 Reviewed By:

Management Review By:

eli(s t oi e. sa erations uperi ntendent-Nuc ear Iegg g ate 1-1/01/88

9-ADM-019 Ma ementon Shift(MOS) ~

,%OS l)h lLY REPORT Vegv

'1'o:

Operations Superintendent-Nuclear Date:

11/01-02/88 From:

John Patterson

(

seruer)

Shift:

Q Day Night Plant Evolutions Observed Unit 3 shutdown, Unit 3 defueled Shift turnover/briefing Tour of unit 4 containment Steain generator eddy current testing Immediate Safety Problems None C.

Ouestionable Work Practices None D.

Areas for Improvement None E.

Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Routine shift operations.

During the shift briefing, the PSN reviewed operating experience on "voiding in the reactor coolant system."

This is a positive step to prevent recurrence of this type of problem.

Completed By:

John Patterson seruer Date:

11/01-02/88 Reviewed By:

Management Review By:

perations uperi ntendent-uclear I l~>2l I ate Date j/

/

'VP 17 1 1/O'I -02/88

J)ate 11/02/88 Shift Report Mids Schimkus Shift Management AI'N Dallau/Singer N~J; Matuszewski A..

Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B.

Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken On 10/30/88 (Sunday Peakshift, PSN (Schimkus) wrote a shift report concerning an effort to return unit 3 PORVs to operable status.

The PSN set-up initial priority at the beginning of the shift as stated.

The order of events was questioned in regards to Technical.

Specifications and a required 2.2 sq.

in. Reactor Coolant System (RCS) opening..The question was if Technical Specifications may not clearly cover off-normal safety conditions and considerations.

The FSN alloweg continued work, and pursued help from licensing to weigh a conservative approach to meet Technical Specification requirements.

Licensing personnel pointed out that the shift directors concerns may have valid reasoning although

the requirements of current Tech. Specs.

and ADM-021 would be met with the FSNs original game plan.

The PSN accepted recommendations, pursued a new alternative and work progressed.

Decisions for this entire shift evolution were made solely by the PSN based on plant personnel recommendations.

(Update to 88-2923 and 88-2925)

C.

Good Practices/Professionalism Observed Shift Director (Mike Crisler) has been exceptional in keeping myself updated on plant status outage work.

He has worked many hours of graveyard backshift and his performance is even more exceptional in light of these scheduled work hours.

gi viewed BP Da~ /!

0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAlLYREPORT Veg>>

To:

Operations Superintendent

- Nuclear Date:

11/02/88 From:

A.

John Hosmer server Plant Evolutions Observed Shift:

Qx Day' Night Unit 3 in mode 5 fillingand venting Unit 4 defueled

'-8 A.M. control room turnover Unit 3 Reactor Coolant System (RCS)'ill and vent thru start Reactor Coolant Pump (RCP) 3A Portions of control room Heating Ventilation Air Conditioning (HVAC) monthly sur veillance Tour of unit 4 containment 2:30 - 4:30 Some of unit 4 spent fuel pool shuffle of fuel from control room 6 A.M. and 2 P.M. status meetings C.

Immediate Safety Problems None Questionable Work Practices None Areas for Improvement On tour of unit 4 containment (2:30 - 4:30), discovered on one Reactor'Coolant Pump, (RCP) with removed motor, one flanged piping connection was without plastic protective cover i.e., flange and piping internals exposed directly to containment.

All other RCPs with motors removed and associated piping disconnected had all flanges protected.

(88 ~~6~~ I~ibj/"gP Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments The unit 3 SRO displayed excellent procedural compliance and control of RCS fill and vent, The PSN provided good direction and overview when r'equired, and ensured unit 3 SRO could focus his individual attention on the RCS fill and 'vent evolution.

Communication to the control room concerning the Justification foi Continued Operation (JCO) associated with PORVs (eg. rack RCP breakers in and out) was adequate.

Completed By:

bserver D I Reviewed By:

Management Review By:

Operations Superintendent-Nuclear

/

J

/

/C3 all(a t unuTiee ate ate 11/02/88

0-ADM-0]9 Manatfement on Shift (MOS)

OLIOS l>hlLYREPORT o.

Operations Superintendent

- Nuclear Date:

, 11/02-03/88 From:

John Patterson

(

server Plant Evolutions Observed Shift:

Q Day E Night Unit 3 shutdown, Unit 4 defueled.

Shift turnover/briefing Tour of Radiation Control Area (RCA)

Tour of unit 4 containinent Steam Generator Eddy current testing Tour of intake structuie B.

Immediate Safety Problems None i4 h

C.'uestionable Vork PractiCes None Areas foi Improvement In the unit 4 containment, there were a few cases of workers not.having their anti-contamination clothing zipped completely up.

Improper use of coveralls can lead to unnecessary contaminations.

(88-2956, additional information)

Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Routine shift operations.

Completed By:

seruer Date:

eviewed By:

Management Review By:

u perations uperi ntendent-Nuclear fe Date:

I/

11/02-03/88

l)etc 11/03/88 Shkf't Report

@gag Mids PSN Shift Management Anderson Al,SN Dallau Spence A.

Duestionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B.

Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken None C.

Good Practices/Professionalism Observed Everyone on peak shift did a great job with no errors considering the amount of work accomplished; three Emergency. Diesel Generators (EDG) tests, starting an Reactor Cooling Pump (RCP), starting the 3A Intake Cooling Water (ICW) pumps test, starting the unit 3

sequencer

test, cross-tying the L.C.s on unit 4, Component Cooling Water (CCW) walkdown, and many clearances.

A good job done for all.

'Date:

SHIFT OVERSIGHT PROGR 8

DAILYREPORT Pjsc

(

server)

Shift:

Day A.

Plant Evolutions Observed Unit 3 in mode 5 Unit 4 defueled 6 A.M. outage briefing Meeting with Arias, Fierce and Schimkus.

Needed to clarify Technical Specification interpretation memo provided on peak shift Diesel 3A 30 day surveillance 2 P.M. outage briefing Plant tour with emphasis on void excavation Read operator standards of professionalisrn B.

Immediate Safety Problems None C.

Questionable Work Practices None D.

Areas for Improvement Common systems and nonstandard Technical Specifications (TS) have resulted in the need for written TS clarifications.

The ll/02/88 TS clarification memo caused confusion on the peak shift.

This confusion was resolved by the referenced meeting and an ll/03/88 further clarification letter from Pierce and Arias.

Other written communication to the control room in the last 3

- 4 days has also caused some initial confusion.

Recommendation:

Have on-shift PSN review all written communication to the control room (give it a users test) prior to formal issuance of the memo.

(88-2978)

Reviewed By:

Operations uperi ntendent-Nuclear Date: ~l Management Review By:

1 llOS:t aaet l bvVbe I~li Idf ote P~

ate ate

~

DAILYREPORT Name:

Page

'ontinuation Page Attached PWO was assigned by Operations to the wrong maintenance organization, IGC.

The solenoid valve in question is a Target Rock valve which requires mechanical maintenance for leak resolution.,

Three.

operators interviewed did;not realize this subtle difference.

Maintenance planning did not pick this up and time was lost.

Recommendation:

Define in some appropriate procedure or data base that Target Rock solenoids require Mechanical Maintenance as the lead versus IGC.

(See attached).

(88-2979)

Professionalism, Summary of,Shift, Comments Two excellent examples of good practice are as follows:

I 1.

NWO informed a

non-operations person requesting permission (and pushing hard) to operate valves, that this was totally unacceptable and would not be allowed and to back off.

2.

NO informed

~ the PSN that waste gas decay tank inerting procedures really could not be used as written (yet.it had been used as is for a long time). The PSN immediately called on-shift -PUP and initiated requred procedure change.

QD'5Q 6ENERATIO QUIPMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTF 11/83/88 88 29 42 NUCLEAR WO REQUEST PLANNING DETAIL

(

1 OF 6 WORK REQ NUMBER: WA8822022 3128 ORIGINATION DATE/TIME:'28288 / 1531 Pl ANT:

PTN UNIT: 83 SYSTEM:

842

'ORIG

~

NAME/DEPT:

A M SINGER

/ 0 LEAO MAINT'DEPT( 1 i 2i 3);

2 REQ PRI'3 UNIT COND REQD '

COMPONENT TAG%: SV-3-6328A ASSOC COMP:

OESG.

PRESSURIZER/REACTOR HEAD VENT DISCHARGF SOLENOID VALVE PLANT 'LOGATION: CNTMT 58 FT EL ADJACENT TO PRESSURIZER CUBICLE DEFECT/REQUEST:

VLV LEAKS DURING TESTING AS PER F.ILL AND VENT PROCEDURE-SERIOUS/REASON:

RCS HEAD VENT VLV LEAKIN6 OFF ICIENCY. 1%64:

CWA TROUBLE/BREWDONI: YES L'CO REQUIRED:

YES STATUS:(

APPROVED

)

REWORK JOB-N IF YES.

WHY?:

FAILURE DATE: 118288 TIME: 1231 STATUS:

A SYMPTOM:

E DETECTION:

C

~~NPRDS ITEM==: (

YES )

DEFICIENCY: TAG LOCATION: ON VPA HOLD DATES 8

8 SUPERVISOR OR NPS APPROVAL: A M SINGER HOLD STATUS:

CANCELEO:

REASON FOR CANCELLATION:

gg DEPRESS THE PFS KEY....

TO PAGE FORWARD PF4 KEY...,

TO PAGE BACK'WARDS PF6 KEY '

~

TO RETURN ENTER KEY....

TO.PROCESS TRANSACTION

\\ ~

',Rate:

11 03-04 8

SHIFT OUR RSIG HT PROG R DAILYREPORT Page John Patterson

(

server)

A.

Plant Evolutions Observed Shift.

Night Unit 3 shutdown, Unit 4 defueled Shift turnover/briefing Tour of Radiation Control Aiea (RCA)

Tour of unit 3 containment Tour of'intake structure OSP-023.1 Diesel Generator Operability Test, "B" Emergency Diesel Generator (EDG)

B.

Immediate Safety Problems None C.

Questionable Work Practices None D.

Areas for Improvement None E.

Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments During his rounds of the unit 3 containment, the Health Physics (HP) technician picked up trash and debris that littered the containment floors. It would be great ifall employees felt this type of pride and ownership in Turkey Point.

Completed By:

John Patterson server Date:

110 8

Reviewed By Operations uperi ntendent-Nuclear Date:

Management Review By:

M-N

/ IIV'te VP Date 11/03/88