L-2015-237, Annual Fitness-for-Duty Program Report -Revised
| ML15271A086 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saint Lucie  |
| Issue date: | 09/16/2015 |
| From: | Katzman E Florida Power & Light Co |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| L-2015-237 | |
| Download: ML15271A086 (6) | |
Text
0 FPL/...
September 16, 2015 L-2015-237 10 CFR 26 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 RE:
St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 Annual Fitness-For-Duty Program Report - Revised On February 24, 2015, in accordance with 10 CFR 26.717, Florida Power & Light Company (FPL) forwarded FPL letter L-2015-050, fitness-for-duty program performance data for 2014. The purpose of this letter is to provide an updated section of the report; 10 CFR Part 26, Subpart I, Annual Fatigue Results. This correspondence supersedes FPL letter L-2015-050 in its entirety.
During a recent FPL internal audit of the Fitness-for-Duty and Access Program, including work hour controls, it was identified that three Security officers were assessed for "Self-Declaration" fatigue assessment, two were determined to be impaired and given 10 hours1.157407e-4 days <br />0.00278 hours <br />1.653439e-5 weeks <br />3.805e-6 months <br /> off and one Officer returned to work. This was reported in error in that all three officers were determined to be impaired and given 10 hours1.157407e-4 days <br />0.00278 hours <br />1.653439e-5 weeks <br />3.805e-6 months <br /> off to obtain adequate rest. This error was entered into the St. Lucie corrective action system for evaluation and associated action.
As part of the follow-up actions, attached are the revised forms for the 2014 Annual Fatigue Results. The increased number of fatigue assessments being reported did not have an effect on the performance objectives for work hours controls.
This omission was discussed with Mr. Perry Buckberg - NRR Project Manager, on September 2, 2015.
Please contact us should you have any questions regarding this submittal.
Sincerely, Eric S. Katzman St. Lucie Plant ESK/DLC Attachments Ao2.*
Florida Power & Light Company i *.t-6501 S. Ocean Drive, Jensen Beach, FL 34957
St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-201 5-237 Attachments Fitness-For-Duty Program Performance Data (2 pages) 10 CER Part 26, Subpart I -Annual Fatigue Results (2 pages)
S p.
APPROJ5O BY 0MB CLEARANCE NO 315th514il esei~es tlciOlZOlti Eseireeted btorden per *rnpespewe to cerp.ly]withr thru Coultoctn r~epues is 114 lier This farrm to a voluntary emeas of reporting tine Istureatlu' req~edin under ¶0 CPR 25.71". Tire itunfmattoo i required by NRC to ebtsio no an inoatl linbsis she spedino ttness4or~driy ('FF) prof-oem perferrenus earn er drug and alcohol lxugras ro lne Itenseno end outhe ente*es. Send canrnrenls roarrg gtrden ustonot to lire FOtIL Pilovasy and tolfnrmtionr Cote~tor Brand, (TI-F5tli. U1. NuClear Regulatory Cernirlesin. W;asoidgo DC 20555i-t0l]t or by e-rrarl to *lc7! t
.itt
- d1Ž.*
and to the Desir Otter Orir of elamrnetiso* and Regulatory Afines NZOB-1tt2ti (3150-01461. Sti*es 0t t~rtagemeod and Sudeet, tttosiongro DC: 35213. It a orar us.ed to loqoone informnntin rrtoer:tOO dues not dardy a urreinot valet 0M.B cnoirol et mbor, th NRC nay not ocirdud: or spu~srtir end a person ioset rraqurrnd to rospd o*
the t otorrntarr soictdiyir
) At 1.1 15
~4 S tyor~ir4 ~o~sro
,{r 6.50' rf AJZsPt tr rsy 6 r> (511<5 'o(rlflorr 5~ Mr,. >1 rirrI 1'~~ Irs. rs:irs;r 6.~rrrtrrtr6.rr Se/ocr Ftrctllty' Petriod ol Rep~rort SI. Lucie [50-335; 50-3fl9)
Total Number of Tests Conducted Total Nuember of Positive, Adulterated, Reason For Testing Licensee Employees Contraciors/Vendors Substituted, and Refusal to Test Results Random
[7j 533]
[iII 0*3
[i bPest-vent
[ Z 1[
I EII[
°IIII1
[Totao (Calclaed Z I, IIIII[
I~ iiI~
FAG Prit-uerr ~lrrrrado Testing Poptr/tiO* end Rate' Average number of Average number of Total size of the random testing pool Annual random testing percentage licensee employees contractorsl*vendors thrtoghout the period (Calculated) achieved for the testing pool Uabr~tromri Tesrrru Does your program uee a Lrcensee Testing Facility?
INo° (Yes I No) identify your HHS-Certitied Labor atorylies)
Q~uesi Diegnrostics, Inc. in Tucker. GA 01i1 yosur program only test fOr NRC-required oubslonces Dosyu rgrmcnutLO etn e
Specimen Test Results ~ j j
(Special Analyses Testing Conducted)
(Optional)
Use Only NRC Cutoff Initial Confirmatory LOD Testing?
Comment Substance Levels? (Yes / No)
Cutoff Cutoff (Yes I No)
(Optional)
Alcohol eINtApial llll Cocaine Yes Yes_____
[1 1 1 1 ] t.OG testing on dilute specimens only i[
]!LOD testing on dilute specimens only Marijuana Yes IYes Ampheamins Ye YesLOG testing on dilute specimens only Opiates YEis iyiiI
[ 77 ] LOD testing on dilute specimens ordy I'CP
[Yes Yes 1
I IIi ] LOG testing on dilute specimnens only LAnnual Report Form (version 1.6.0 - December 19. 2014)
- Page 1 of 2 -
NRC Form 891 (12/2014)
S~rnrrrrt-a r'. Mnagement Actiorns - 2ti.717(b)(8)
Summarize actions implemented to Improve FF1) program performance. As applicable, reference in the topic; description audit reports, 30-day reports, andlor correctve action reports. If reporting information on more than three topics, select,Others" for Topic 3 to report any additional topics.
Topic 1 Description Topic 1 SProgram anti System Managemrent Topic 2 Ceritled Laboratories F'or the reporting period of 2014, fifteen (15) individuals were denied unescorted access authorization after testing positive for drugs or alcohrol By test type, one (1) follow-up test was positive, two (2) for cause-observed behavior tests were positive, nine (9) pre-aoceass lasts were positive. and three (3) random tests were pos'tie.
Follow-Up Positive Test One (1) contractor employee tested positive for marijuana. The individual wee dented access.
F-or Ceese - Observed Behestor Positive Test One (1) licensee employee tested positive for alcohol, The individual was denied access. One (1) coantractor employee tested positive for marijuana. The individual was denied access.
Topic 2 Description For ire 2014 reporting period, all blind specimens submitted to St Lucia nuclear plait's HHS-certifred laboratory yielded expected results.
One (1) specimes was teal in transit by the DHHS ceritifed laboratory. The individual was retested with, negative results.
j]
Add an additional Topic Topic 3 Poicies and Procedures]
Topic 3 Descriptiorr Three (3) individuals appealed their POSitive drug test results, tn each case the appeal test supportled the original drug lest result Pereorrsnj Raspcnu.ibfn fort ncfurmerro Prov~idvd Person lw(equired):
First Name Last Name Position Title Company Email Address Parses 2 (aptanal):
First Neme Last Name Position Title Company Email Addreass Final Step$ (Requored)j - NRC will consider this form authentic in accordance with 26.11 only when the =Valitdate & Loclr button has been selected and alt errors (i.e., those highlighted in red) have been corrected. The "Validate & Loclr button will change to "Locked" after the data validation process han bees succesafulty completed and the form is ready for submission.
~~Form Locked On: Feb 16, 2015 at 1:47:13 PM I Saveto LO(*
PC uPnt *his Repart Annual Report Form (version 1.6.0 - December 19, 2014)
- Page 2 of 2 -
NRC Form 891 (!2/2014 Annual Report Form iveraton 1.6.0- December itt, 20141
- Page 2 of 2 -
NRC Form 891 (12/2014)
~P~me10CF Prt26 Sbprt-nnalFaige eslt 10 CFR Part 26, Subpart I - Annual Fatigue Results umayof Waiver Issuance - 26.20()1(-i Number of Waivers Issued (Note: At least one of the celts in this table should have a non-negative value)
Operating or on-site directing of the Pefrigheath phsc or chmsr Performing duties of a tire brigadle Perfring,,;, maintenance or onnite Performing security operations of systems as described in Pefrigdirecting of maintenance. as described in Wiorik Hour Controls 26.4(a)(1 duties an described in 26.4(a)(2) member, as described in 26.4(a)(3)
- 264(a(4) duties as described in 26.4(e)(5) patn L
Toa Outage Outage (days Outage (after Outage (after Outage (after Outage (after Outage (after
____Operating 1-60) day 60)
Operating day 50)
Operating Ouag day 60)
Operating Oua day 00)
Operating day 60)
Exceed 16 wert hrs in wrey 24l Wr hreso 5
0 50 Hy ourk Exceed 28 welt his mnany 26.205(o")(1) 48hfr pertd
____o__
Exceeded 72 we~kt*
lsin any?7 day L.ess than 10 hr break bit successdve work periods (for 8 hr break Rest Breaks acomdtn sceue rnlit 26.205(o i ltls)_____
_____(2_____
___t__
__h__
Lass than 34 hi reak In anoy day Angu leasthan 2 daysolffper week Minimum for lOIso shtifts eate cperlt0 Days Off Per Avg of less than 2,5 lays off per 26.205(d)(5)
Ls fW Minimum 10 Days Offfr 26.205(d)(7)
Lasttn4 d*ays of pe _ucesv
________T1TfL PlU I C: rot inulvl*lu*tl5 p*rTormtll* Tire I:*l*aae Quaes anQ otrter ouues, pmase coum mere on*/unoer me rile Dngeoe COlUmi*l, uo not QOUOle COURt Elese inolvlouals.
10 CFR Part 26, Subpart I - Annual Fatigue Results Facilit Name St. Lucle Report Period Distribution of Waiver for Individuals in Each Category - 26.203(e)(1)(iii)
Summary of Corrective Actions - 26.203(e)(2)
Analysis of Waiver Assessment Data:
Number or Employees Issued Waivers Operating or on-Performing ProPerforming site directing of health physics Pefrming manencorPfrmg duties of a firemaneacorPfrig Number of Waivers the operations or chemistry brigade member onsite directing security duties of systems, as duties as adecidinof maintenance as described in ddescribed in esrbdi 64a()*as described in 26.4(a)(5) 26,4(a)(1 )
26,4(a)(2) 26.4a(),
64(a)(4) 4 "5
S S
9 9_
10 Mor1tan20 Total Number of'i Emplye Ise Waives 0
90 Mos Waivers...
Provided to a*
indiviua 0O,01
- Note: For ierdivoaS$ perormi0ng the Sie brtigde duties, piease couot them, on*n under tire brigadeoum.
000,,,
Onot double nou~nt these. ktdihiduels.
There were nine waivers performed in 2014. Eight of the waivers were related to an emergent down power to support a recovery of foreign1 material in the Unit 2 B steam generator bowel.The waivered individuals performed activities to support SIG nozzle dam removal, installation of SG manways and tube plugging evaluations to enable exiting RCS midloop conditions. One additional waiver was necessary forea valve repair by a Furmanite Technician with unique qualifications. The waivers were associated with work hour controls greater than 16 hours1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br /> in a 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> period, greater than 26 hours3.009259e-4 days <br />0.00722 hours <br />4.298942e-5 weeks <br />9.893e-6 months <br /> in a 48 hour5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> period, greater than 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> in a 7 day period, and less than a day off for 7day period.
Analysis of Fatigue Assessment Data:
Eight online fatigue assessments were conducted in 2014: 1) Five workers were assessed "For-Cause," two (2) Security Officers, two (21 Contractor workers, and one(1) Maintenance worker. The Security Officers were determined to be impaired, given 10 hours1.157407e-4 days <br />0.00278 hours <br />1.653439e-5 weeks <br />3.805e-6 months <br /> offeand advised of strategies for obtaining adequate rest or combating fatigue. The Maintenance worker was determined to be impaired and was given 1 0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> offeand advised of strategies for obtaining adequate rest or combating fatigue, the two (2) Contractors wore determined not to be impaired and continued to work, 2) Three Security Officers were assessed for "Serf-Declaration" fatigue assessments. The Officers were determined to be impaired, given 10 hours1.157407e-4 days <br />0.00278 hours <br />1.653439e-5 weeks <br />3.805e-6 months <br /> off and advised of strategies for obtaining adequate rest or countering fatigue.
==
Conclusions:==
There were a total of nine (9) waivers issued in 2014. The waivers wore not required for safety or security reasons but was required to assure the identifed tasks could be performed to enable exiting mid-Ioop conditions.
Summary of Status of Corrective Actions:
There ware no corrective actions taken in response to the use of waivers and the conduct of fatigue assessments in 2014.