L-2014-170, Fourth Ten-Year Interval Unit 2 Relief Request No. 4, Revision 0

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Fourth Ten-Year Interval Unit 2 Relief Request No. 4, Revision 0
ML14203A005
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/30/2014
From: Katzman E
Florida Power & Light Co
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
L-2014-170
Download: ML14203A005 (5)


Text

0FPL.

June 30, 2014 L-2014-170 10 CFR 50.4 10 CFR 50.55a U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Re:

St. Lucie Unit 2 Docket No. 50-389 Inservice Inspection Plan Fourth Ten-Year Interval Unit 2 Relief Request No. 4, Revision 0 In accordance with 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3)(ii), Florida Power & Light (FPL) requests relief from the requirements for performing visual examinations of the reactor vessel and associated Class 1 and Class 2 piping in covered trenches rendered inaccessible in conjunction with the pressure testing of Class I and 2 components are provided in ASME Section XI, Articles IWA-5000, IWB-5000 and IWC-5000. FPL requests approval to perform the examination of the subject components at different plant conditions than those required by the ASME Code.

Please contact Ken Frehafer at (772) 467-7748 if there are any questions about this submittal.

Sincerely, Eric S. Katzman Licensing Manager St. Lucie Plant Attachment ESK/KWF Florida Power & Light Company 6501 S. Ocean Drive, Jensen Beach, FL 34957 Ac4-7

L-2014-170 Attachment Page 1 of 4 St. Lucie Unit 2 FOURTH INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST NUMBER 4, REV. 0 Proposed Alternative In Accordance with 10CFR50.55a(a)(3)(ii)

--Hardship or Unusual Difficulty without Compensating Increase in Level of Quality or Safety--

1.

ASME Code Components Affected St. Lucie Unit 2 Reactor Vessel and associated Class 1 and Class 2 piping in covered trenches rendered inaccessible due to Containment Building configuration.

Exam Item Cat.

Nos.

Examination Description Cat.

N os.

Reactor Vessel - Pressure Retaining Boundary Bottom Head Area B-P B15.10, Piping - Pressure Retaining Boundary (covered portions only)

B15.20 SI Headers 12-S1-148, 149, 150, 151 Charging 2-CH-147 Letdown 2-RC-142 Piping - Pressure Retaining Components (covered portions C-H C7.10 only)

SDC Suction 10-SI-362, 363 Hot Leg Injection 3-S1-179, 181

2.

Applicable Code Edition and Addenda

The Code of record for St. Lucie Unit 2 (PSL-2) is the 2007 Edition with 2008 Addenda of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section XI, "Rules for Inservice Inspection of Nuclear Power Plant Components."

3.

Applicable Code Requirement

The requirements for performing visual examinations in conjunction with the pressure testing of Class 1 and 2 components are provided in ASME Section XI, Articles IWA-5000, IWB-5000 and IWC-5000.

Paragraph IWA-5241(b) states the following:

"For components whose external surfaces are inaccessible for direct VT-2 visual examination, only the examination of the surrounding area (including floor areas or equipment surfaces located underneath the components) for evidence of leakage shall be required."

Paragraph IWA-5241(h) states the following:

"When examining insulated components, the examination of surrounding area (including floor areas or equipment surfaces located underneath the

L-2014-170 Attachment Page 2 of 4 St. Lucie Unit 2 FOURTH INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST NUMBER 4, REV. 0 components) for evidence of leakage, or other areas to which leakage may be channeled, shall be required."

Paragraph IWB-5221(a) states the following:

"The system leakage test shall be conducted at a pressure not less than the pressure corresponding to 100% rated reactor power."

Paragraph IWC-5221 states the following:

"The system leakage test shall be conducted at the system pressure obtained while the system, or portion of the system, is in service performing its normal operating function or at the system pressure developed during a test conducted to verify system operability (e.g., to demonstrate system safety function or satisfy technical specification surveillance requirements).

4.

Reason for Request

St. Lucie Plant does not have access for a direct visual examination of the reactor vessel bottom area during the ASME Section Xl System Leakage Test visual examination VT-2 walkdown. There are three possible pathways that lead to the area. Two are in the electrical tunnel at the bottom of the containment "keyway" and are blocked by the Reactor Cavity Relief Dampers (Blast Dampers). These dampers consist of horizontal louvers approximately 11-inch wide and normally remain in the closed position. They are not intended for human passage. The third pathway is through the reactor cavity sump, a small tunnel from the cavity to the weir pit. A cooling duct runs through this tunnel limiting the height to a crawl space to approximately one foot high and six to eight feet long. Ambient conditions during VT-2 examinations at normal operating conditions create an extreme heat stress environment and, combined with a nearly impossible exit pathway, make examination of this area an excessively hazardous work situation. For these reasons, St. Lucie VT-2 inspectors have considered the reactor bottom area to be inaccessible for examination at normal operating conditions. The increase in the level of quality and safety gained by performing a visual inspection at normal operating conditions does not compensate for the safety hazard the inspector would be subjected to.

Some segments of Class 1 and Class 2 reactor support piping pass through trenches that are covered and secured during normal operation. These trenches are required to be covered and secured prior to entering Mode 4 following a shutdown to ensure containment sump recirculation flowpaths are maintained.

This is outlined in the St. Lucie response to NRC Bulletin 2003-01 (FPL Letter L-2003-201). The trench covers prohibit direct examination of horizontal insulation joints and low points as directed by IWA-5241. However, due to gaps and handholes in the trench covers and the use of grating in some locations, surrounding areas can be observed for evidence of leakage. Areas to which leakage may be channeled are also open in many locations throughout the containment for observation during the System Leakage Test. This is in compliance with the requirements of IWA-5241(h).

L-2014-170 Attachment Page 3 of 4 St. Lucie Unit 2 FOURTH INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST NUMBER 4, REV. 0

5.

Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use Proposed Alternative Pursuant to 10CFR50.55a(a)(3)(ii),

FPL requests approval to perform the examination of the reactor vessel bottom head area and piping in covered trenches at different plant conditions than those required by the ASME Code.

FPL will continue to perform the required system pressure tests as prescribed by IWB-5000 each refueling outage and IWC-5000 each period, and will examine all accessible components in accordance with IWA-5241.

For those portions of components rendered inaccessible by Containment Building configuration, as an alternative to the requirements of IWA-5241, at least once each period during refueling FPL will open the inaccessible areas and perform a VT-2 examination of the reactor vessel bottom and other associated piping following plant cooldown and depressurization. This inspection will check insulation surfaces and joints for signs of leakage or residue. Any evidence of leakage will be evaluated in accordance with IWA-5250, which may include additional inspections and insulation removal as deemed necessary.

Basis for Use The objective of the required visual examination at normal operating conditions is to detect evidence of leakage and thereby verify the integrity of the reactor coolant system (RCS) pressure boundary. FPL believes the same evidence of leakage can be identified by visual examination following cooldown for refueling.

The St. Lucie reactors have no bottom head penetrations, and have been volumetrically examined in accordance with the rules of Section XI with no relevant indications identified. There is no expectation of leakage due to the solid configuration of the bottom of the reactor pressure vessel. In addition, the reactor cavity is monitored for leakage continuously during operation, and inventory balance is performed daily throughout the operating cycle. Therefore, FPL concludes that the proposed alternative provides reasonable assurance of system integrity and an acceptable level of quality and safety comparable to an examination performed at normal operating conditions.

6.

Duration of Proposed Alternative FPL will implement the alternative requirements during the fourth 10-year Inservice Inspection interval at PSL-2 which began August 8, 2013 and ends August 7, 2023.

L-2014-170 Attachment Page 4 of 4 St. Lucie Unit 2 FOURTH INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST NUMBER 4, REV. 0

7.

Precedents This alternative was previously authorized by the NRC at St. Lucie during the Unit 1 Third Inservice Inspection Interval, Relief Request No. 25, and the Unit 2 Third Inservice Inspection Interval, Relief Request No. 4, in a Safety Evaluation Report dated April 13, 2004, ADAMS Accession No. ML041040851.

8.

Attachments to the Request None