L-2014-051, Annual Fitness-for-Duty Program Report for 2013
| ML14063A062 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saint Lucie  |
| Issue date: | 02/17/2014 |
| From: | Katzman E Florida Power & Light Co |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response |
| References | |
| L-2014-051 | |
| Download: ML14063A062 (5) | |
Text
0FPL.
February 17, 2014 L-2014-051 10 CFR 26 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 RE:
St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 Annual Fitness-For-Duty Proqram Report In accordance with 10 CFR 26.717, letter forwards the fitness-for-duty program performance data for the period of January 1 through December 31, 2013.
Enclosed are the following attachments: Fitness For Duty Program Performance Data (via EIE General Submission Portal) and 10 CFR Part 26, Subpart I-Annual Fatigue Results.
Please contact us should you have any questions regarding this submittal.
Sincerely, Eric S. Katzman Licensing Manager St. Lucie Plant ESK/tlt Attachments Florida Power & Light Company 6501 S. Ocean Drive, Jensen Beach, FL 34957
St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2014-051 Attachments Fitness For Duty Program Performance Data (2 pages) 10 CFR Part 26, Subpart I-Annual Fatigue Results (1 page)
D Submission Update
- 1) AMl fields required except those mar*ed 'ptional'
- 2) Use Adobe Reader 8 or later for this form to work properly.
- 3) Hold your mouse over a form field to view additional Information.
Select Facility
[St. Lucie [50-335; 50-389]
Tests Conducted In the Calendar Year Period of Report 2013 Reason For Testing Total Number of Tests Conducted Total Number of Positive, Adulterated, Licensee Employees ContractorsNendors Substituted, and Refusal to Test Results Pr-Aces 36 11,5074 JI0i Random 59311481::1 ForCae1 1, 1 i
0 Post-Event I
°:1 Total (Calculated)
[
70 1
2,0:3]9 I:1:]
FFD Program Random Testing Population and Rate Average number of Average number of Total size of the random testing pool Annual random testing percentage licensee employees contractors/vendors throughout the period (Calculated) achieved for the testing pool IF 901 i
2,0091 52.8 Laboratory Testing Does your program use a F
Licensee Testing Facility?
No (Yes / No)
Identify your HHS-Certified Laboratory(ies)
Quest Diagnostics Identify your Blind Performance Test Sample supplier(s) IElsohly Laboratories Substances Tested Did your program only test for NRC-required substances Does your program conduct LOD testing AND at the NRC-specified minimum cutoff levels? (Yes I No) Yes Dopermitted in 26.163(a)(2)? (Yes /
in Yes Substance Use Only NRC Cutoff Initial Confirmatory LOD Testing?
Comment Levels? (Yes I No)
Cutoff Cutoff (Yes / No)
(Optional)
Alcohol fYes iNot Applicable Cocaine Yes Fes]
Marijuana E~esI~ iII Amphetamines E~esiIII Opiates iYes l EYIe PCP Yes YesI Annual Report Form (version 1.5.0 - January 1, 2014)
- Page 1 of 2 -
Annual Report Form (version 1.5.0 - January 1,2014)
- Page 1 of2 -
Substances Tested - continued Summary of Management Actions - 26.717(b)(8)
Summarize actions implemented to improve FFD program performance. As applicable, reference in the topic description audit reports, 30-day reports, and/or corrective action reports. If reporting information on more than three topics, select "Others" for Topic 3 to report any additional topics.
Topic 1 Topic 1 Description Program and System Management There was one (1) subversion attempt during the 2013 reporting period.
St. Lucie Nuclear Plant had one (1) reportable event as defined in 10CFR Part 26.719 during this reporting period. On April 3, 2013, at 14:13 (EST) a 24-hour reportable FFD event report (#48882) was made in accordance with 10 CFR 26.719(b)(2)(ii).
Topic 2 Topic 2 Description Blind Performance Test Samples For the 2013 reporting period, all blind specimens submitted to St. Lucie Nuclear Plant's HHS certified laboratory yielded expected results.
ID Add an additional Topic Topic 3 Topic 3 Description
_Random Testing__
Two (2) random specimens were lost in transit by the laboratory courier. The specimens were not o
T i
recovered. The two (2) individuals were retested with negative results.
I f
Person(s) Responsible for Information Provided Person 1 (required):
r
=1 Robert IIBoskey I Access/FFD Supervisor I Robert.L.Boskey@fpl.com I
First Name Person 2 (optional):
Last Name Position Title Company Email Address IDavid I IBonthron I AA/FFD Program Manger I david.bonthron@fpl.com First Name Last Name Position Title Company Email Address Final Step (Required) - NRC will consider this form authentic in accordance with 26.11 only when the Validate & Lock" button has been selected and all errors (i.e., those highlighted in red) have been corrected. The 'Validate & Lock" button will change to "Locked" after the data validation process has been successfully completed and the form is ready for submission.
Form Locked On: Feb 14, 2014 at 9:30:14 AM a
t P
AnulRpr om(eso
- 0-Jnay1 04 t
ui 5-3;5-8]JPro of, pr-t----1203I-aeo Annual Report Form (version 1.5.0 - January 1, 2014)
ISt. Lucie [50-335; 50-3891 Period of Report: [!0 ý3
- Page 2 of 2 -
10 CFR Part 26, Subpart I -Annual Fatigue Results ELQIU-H=&m Re3ort Period 1 LLuc*
-vi Distribution of Waiver for Individuals in Each Category - 26.203(e)(1)(iii)
Number of Employees Issued Waivers Operating or on-Performing Performing Performing site directing of health physics duties of a fire maintenance or Performing Number of Waivers the operations or chemistry brigade member onsite directing security duties of systems, as duties as as described in of maintenance as described in described in described in 26.4(a)(3) i as described in 26.4(a)(5) 26.4(a)(1) 26.4(a)(2) 26.4(a)(4) 1 2
3 5
8 11-20.....
More than 20_
Total Number of Employees Issued Waers0 1
0 0
0 Motaiers Provided to a Single individual 0
1 0
0 0
' ote: Fo~ idividas performing the rthe brigade duties plese. ount the,, o,#y ut.e fir brgded, coun Do not double coun~ theseindivduals.
Summary of Corrective Actions - 26.203(e)(2)
I Analysis of Waiver Assessment Data:
There was one Chemistry worker waiver approved for covered workers in 2013. Although there were two qualified workers that could have filled the position without requiring a Part 26 Waiver they were not available for work The waiver was not required for safety or security reasons but was required to assure the minimum chemistry tasks could be performed for the shift and to fulfill the minimum emergency response organization (ERO) compliment.
Analysis of Fatigue Assessment Data:
A review of 2013 fatigue assessments were performed for two (2) case of "For Cause," seven (7) "Self-Declared," and two (2) for "Post-Event" cases. Each case reviewed identified that appropriate actions were taken. Each of the individuals were performing pre-outage activities at the time of self-declaration or a condition resulting in a fatigue assessment, therefore, no additional management actions resulted from these assessments. Additionally, one Face-to-Face assessment was performed for an individual to assure the minimum chemistry tasks could be performed for the operating shift and assure the minimum ERO compliment was meL
==
Conclusions:==
There was a total of 1 waiver issued in 2013. The waiver was not required for safety or security reasons but was required to assure the minimum chemistry tasks could be performed for the operating shift and assure the minimum ERO compliment was met.
Summary of Status of Corrective Actions:
There were no corrective actions taken in response to the use of waivers and the conduct of fatigue assessments in 2013.